Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Technology, Energy & Communications Committee | |
E2SSB 6438
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Coordinating the development of a statewide high-speed internet deployment and adoption initiative.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Kohl-Welles, Rockefeller, Oemig, Honeyford, Murray, Delvin and Pridemore).
Brief Summary of Engrossed Second Substitute Bill |
|
|
Hearing Date: 2/26/08
Staff: Kara Durbin (786-7133).
Background:
In the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Congress directed the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) and state regulatory commissions to "encourage the deployment on a
reasonable and timely basis of advanced telecommunications capability to all Americans."
The term "advanced telecommunications capability" is used by the FCC to describe services and
facilities with an upstream (customer-to-provider) and downstream (provider-to-customer)
transmission speed exceeding 200 kilobits per second (kbps). The FCC uses the term "high-
speed" for those services with over 200 kbps capability in at least one direction.
The term "broadband service" generally refers to the high-speed transmission of electronic
information. Several different types of technologies can be used to provide broadband service,
including digital subscriber line (DSL), cable modem, satellite, remote DSL, broadband over
power lines, wireless internet service providers, and Wi-Fi networks.
National Broadband Surveys: According to a 2006 survey by the U.S. Government
Accountability Office (GAO), a variety of characteristics related to households and services
influence whether consumers purchase broadband services. The GAO found that households
with higher incomes were more likely to adopt broadband than lower-income households, and
those households with a college-educated head of household were more likely to purchase
broadband than those households headed by someone who did not graduate from college. While
the GAO found that rural households are less likely to adopt broadband, their findings indicate
that this difference may be related in part to the lower availability of broadband in rural areas. In
addition, the GAO identified the price of broadband service as a barrier to adoption for some
consumers.
State Study: The Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC) received an appropriation of
$160,000 in the 2007-2009 Operating Budget (Budget) to conduct a survey to "identify factors
preventing the widespread availability and use of broadband technologies." Specifically, the
Budget directed the UTC to collect and interpret reliable geographic, demographic, cultural, and
telecommunications technology information to identify broadband disparities in the state. In
conducting the study, the UTC must consult with appropriate stakeholders in designing the
survey. The UTC must report its findings to the Legislature by December 31, 2007.
Summary of Bill:
The Department of Information Services (DIS) must coordinate development of a
comprehensive, statewide high-speed internet deployment and adoption initiative to be
implemented through a public-private partnership with a non-profit organization. The goals of
the initiative are to: (1) ensure all residents and businesses have access to affordable and reliable
high-speed internet services; (2) achieve improved technology literacy, increased computer
ownership, and high-speed internet use among state residents and businesses; (3) establish and
empower local technology planning teams and partnerships to plan for improved technology use
across multiple community sectors; (4) establish and sustain an environment ripe for statewide
telecommunications and technology investment, including solicitation and receipt of grants,
loans, and other financial mechanisms; and (5) create and regularly update a statewide
geographic inventory of high-speed internet service.The DIS must convene a work group by June
1, 2008, to develop a high-speed internet deployment and adoption strategy by September 1,
2008, that will accomplish the following goals:
By December 1, 2008, the DIS must report to the Legislature with recommendations on
benchmarks and performance measures, budget and legislative needs, safeguards to protect
proprietary and confidential information, a plan to complete baseline mapping of high-speed
internet resources in the state in an 18-month period, and a plan for launching community
technology teams. The DIS must contract with a non-profit organization with established
competency in: (1) accomplishing the deployment and adoption of high-speed internet services
and information technology; and (2) working directly with high-speed internet providers in the
handling, storage, and use of proprietary and competitively sensitive data. High-speed internet
providers may designate any data submitted to a non-profit organization under this act as
confidential and exempt from disclosure under the Public Records Act.
By January 1, 2009, the DIS must publish a web directory of public facilities that provide
community technology programs in the state.
The bill provides an expiration date of June 30, 2011, for the high-speed internet deployment and
adoption initiative.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.