SENATE BILL REPORT
SB 6695
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported By Senate Committee On:
Consumer Protection & Housing, January 31, 2008
Title: An act relating to distressed home transactions.
Brief Description: Concerning distressed home transactions.
Sponsors: Senators Weinstein and Kline.
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Consumer Protection & Housing: 1/25/08, 1/31/08 [DPS].
SENATE COMMITTEE ON CONSUMER PROTECTION & HOUSING
Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 6695 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.Signed by Senators Weinstein, Chair; Kauffman, Vice Chair; Honeyford, Ranking Minority Member; Delvin, Haugen, Jacobsen and Kilmer.
Staff: Vanessa Firnhaber-Baker (786-7471)
Background: The foreclosure process on residential property occurs when a homeowner defaults
on his or her mortgage payments. The foreclosure process is determined by the type of financing
the owner received, such as through a mortgage, deed of trust, or real estate contract. In
Washington, deeds of trust are the most common and they are generally foreclosed by a non-judicial sale (a sale outside the court).
If a lender forecloses on a home through a non-judicial proceeding, the lender must provide the
homeowner with a notice of default, and then, at least 30 days later, provide the borrower with
a Notice of Trustee's Sale and Notice of Foreclosure. Under a non-judicial foreclosure, a
homeowner can avoid foreclosure by making the delinquent payments up to 11 days before the
sale. The property can not be sold until at least 190 days have passed since the homeowner fell
behind in payments; and once the property is sold, the homeowner must move out within 20 days
or the purchaser may file an eviction (unlawful detainer) without providing the original
homeowner any additional notice.
Credit Services Organization Act. Washington has some laws governing certain practices
involving foreclosure of real property. The Credit Services Organization Act (CSOA) applies to
any company that performs or claims it can perform certain services for a person, such as
stopping, preventing, or delaying a foreclosure, in return for a fee or some other consideration.
CSOA requires licensing and bonding of certain credit service organizations, requires a written
contract with a right of cancellation, and makes a violation of the CSOA a Consumer Protection
Act (CPA) violation.
Equity Skimming. "Equity skimming" practices are used to obtain title to properties for the
purpose of either taking the equity out of the property or obtaining rents or payments on the
property without satisfying any of the underlying obligations that may exist on the property. For
example, a person induces a homeowner who is in financial distress to deed the property to the
person with the assurance that the person will assume the underlying debt on the property. The
person never assumes the debt, but instead rents or sells the property and diverts value from the
property to his or her own personal use. The property is eventually foreclosed. In Washington,
equity skimming is a class B felony and a violation of the CPA.
Consumer Protection Act. Under the CPA, the Attorney General may bring an action in the name
of the state against any person to restrain and prevent an unlawful action. The court may order
to restore to any person of interest, any personal or real property acquired by means of any act
violating the CPA. The CPA also allows any person who is injured in his or her business or
property by a CPA violation to bring a civil action to stop further violations and to recover actual
damages, plus reasonable attorney's fees. In addition, the court may award the plaintiff treble
damages (three times the actual damages sustained) not to exceed 10 thousand dollars.
Foreclosure Rescue Transactions. Homeowners who are late, or at risk of being late in their
mortgage payments or have defaulted on their mortgage, may be approached with offers to assist
them with their mortgage problems. Several types of assistance may be offered.
First, a person may offer to buy the homeowner's house and allow the homeowner to continue to
live there as a tenant. The buyer may make representations before the sale that after a certain
period of time, the homeowner will have paid enough rent to get his or her home back. This is
commonly referred to as a sale-leaseback transaction.
Second, a homeowner may be approached with an offer of a "foreclosure surplus sale." When
a foreclosed house is auctioned off, the sale may bring more money than is due on the mortgage.
That additional money is called "surplus equity." In a foreclosure surplus sale, the homeowner
assigns his or her right to the surplus equity to the buyer for a lump sum.
Third, other types of services may be offered to the homeowner. For instance, a person may offer
to negotiate with the lender on the homeowner's behalf or offer to arrange a sale of the home that
includes an option for the homeowner to repurchase it in the future.
In some circumstances, these transactions may result in the homeowner being misled or
defrauded.
Summary of Bill: The bill as referred to committee was not heard.
SUMMARY OF BILL (Recommended Substitute): Regulations are imposed to govern
distressed home transactions and distressed home conveyances.
Distressed Home Transactions. A distressed home consultant (consultant) is a person who offers
to provide mortgage, credit, or other debt assistance to an owner of a home that is in danger of
foreclosure or is in the process of being foreclosed.
In addition to any applicable disclosure or related requirements in the CSOA and the mortgage
brokers practices act, a transaction between a consultant and homeowner is voidable by the
homeowner at any time unless the following requirements are met.
First, distressed home consulting transactions must: (1) be in writing and in the language that the
consultant used to describe his or her services; (2) fully disclose the exact nature of the services
to be provided; (3) be dated and signed by the homeowner; and (4) contain the consultant's full
contact information.
Second, the transaction contract required must also include a conspicuous notice warning the
homeowner that the transaction could result in the loss of his or her home and advising the
homeowner to consult with an attorney before entering into the contract.
Third, the consultant must provide the homeowner with a copy of the contract and must also keep
a copy of the contract on file for at least five years.
Consultants owe fiduciary duties to homeowner. These duties specifically include: acting in
good faith and in the best interests of the homeowner, disclosure of all material facts to the
homeowner, using reasonable care, and providing an accounting to the homeowner for all money
received from the homeowner.
Licensed attorneys, financial institutions that a homeowner is a customer of, and nonprofit
licensed credit counseling organizations are not distressed home consultants and are not subject
to the above restrictions.
The provisions of the act may not be waived by the homeowner.
Distressed Home Conveyances. A distressed home conveyance is a transaction in which: (1) a
foreclosed homeowner transfers an interest in the distressed home to a distressed home purchaser
(DHP); (2) the DHP allows the foreclosed homeowner to occupy the home; and (3) the DHP or
a person acting in participation with the DHP conveys or promises to convey the home to the
foreclosed homeowner, or provides the foreclosed homeowner with an option to purchase the
home at a later date, or promises the foreclosed homeowner an interest in, or portion of, the
proceeds of any resale of the home. Terms of a distressed home conveyance include:
A violation of the distressed home consulting and distressed home conveyance provisions are a
per se violation of the Consumer Protection Act (CPA). In a private right of action under the
CPA, the court may double or triple the damages award, subject to the statutory limit. However,
if the court determines that the defendant acted in bad faith, the limit for doubling or tripling the
damages award may be increased up to $100,000. A claim for damages must be filed within four
years of the date of the alleged violation. The act neither limits nor supersedes any other remedy
or legal theory otherwise available to a homeowner.
Unlawful Detainer Actions Involving Distressed Homes. In an unlawful detainer action involving
distressed home, the plaintiff (purchaser) must disclose to the court whether the defendant
previously held title to the distressed home and explain how the purchaser came to acquire title.
A defendant who previously held title to the distressed home may not be required to escrow any
money pending trial when a material question of fact exists as to whether the plaintiff (purchaser)
acquired title from the defendant though a distressed home conveyance.
All other related actions are stayed pending the outcome of the unlawful detainer action.
EFFECT OF CHANGES MADE BY CONSUMER PROTECTION & HOUSING
COMMITTEE (Recommended Substitute): Incorporates distressed home conveyance
requirements contained in SB 6431, including contract disclosure requirements, a five day right
to cancel the contract, and the verification of the ability to pay requirement.
The unlawful detainer provisions of SB 6383 are incorporated, which require a plaintiff in an
unlawful detainer action involving a distressed home to disclose to the court that the defendant
previously held title to the home.
The $100,000 CPA damages limit is extended to claims involving distressed home consulting
contracts.
Fiduciary duties are imposed on distressed home consultants.
There are technical changes to the definitions and terms used for consistency.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony on Recommended Substitute: PRO: In general, the
foreclosure process works well; the bidding on homes at auction is competitive. It is only when
third parties make dishonest representations that the previous owners of foreclosed homes lose
all their equity. When the notices of foreclosures are published, scam artists use these lists to
contact homeowners. Homeowners facing foreclosure don't understand the process and are
especially vulnerable because they are desperate to stay in their home. Often times, foreclosure
is not the worst case scenario, many people get money back after the auction occurs, but
homeowners facing foreclosure may not know this. The common element in all foreclosure
rescue scams is misplaced trust. This bill will save the state money and will not cost it anything.
The people regulated under this bill are similar to financial advisors, so they should be held to a
high standard in their dealings with homeowners. This bill is very comprehensive and could
stand by itself. Foreclosure rescue scams are becoming increasingly common; we need to nip this
problem in the bud. The normal rules of the marketplace don't apply in these transactions, so
regulations are needed.
OTHER: This bill would be even better if the distressed home consultant's specific duties to the
homeowner were enumerated. The bill may not be a complete solution because a contract
containing unconscionable content could still occur.
Persons Testifying: PRO: Jim Sugarman, Attorney General's Office; Fred Corbit, Northwest
Justice Project; Kim Justice, Statewide Poverty Action Network.
OTHER: Jim Sugarman, Attorney General's Office; Fred Corbit, Northwest Justice Project.