BILL REQ. #: H-1934.3
State of Washington | 60th Legislature | 2007 Regular Session |
READ FIRST TIME 02/26/07.
AN ACT Relating to health professions; amending RCW 18.130.050, 18.130.060, 18.130.080, 18.130.090, 18.130.170, 18.130.172, 18.130.310, 70.41.210, and 43.70.320; reenacting and amending RCW 18.130.160; adding new sections to chapter 18.130 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 42.52 RCW; creating new sections; prescribing penalties; providing an effective date; and declaring an emergency.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 From statehood, Washington has
constitutionally provided for the regulation of the practice of
medicine and the sale of drugs and medicines. This constitutional
recognition of the importance of regulating health care practitioners
derives not from providers' financial interest in their license, but
from the greater need to protect the public health and safety by
assuring that the health care providers and medicines that society
relies upon meet certain standards of quality.
The legislature finds that the issuance of a license to practice as
a health care provider should be a means to ensure quality and not be
a means to ensure financial benefit for providers. Statutory and
administrative requirements provide sufficient due process protections
to prevent the unwarranted revocation of a health care provider's
license. While those due process protections must be maintained, there
is an urgent need to return to the original constitutional mandate that
patients be ensured quality from their health care providers. The
legislature has recognized and medical malpractice reforms have
recognized the importance of quality and patient safety through such
measures as a new adverse events reporting system. Reforms to the
health care provider licensing system is another step toward improving
quality in health care. Therefore, the legislature intends to increase
the authority of those engaged in the regulation of health care
providers to swiftly identify and remove health care providers who pose
a risk to the public.
Sec. 2 RCW 18.130.050 and 2006 c 99 s 4 are each amended to read
as follows:
The disciplining authority has the following authority:
(1) To adopt, amend, and rescind such rules as are deemed necessary
to carry out this chapter;
(2) To ((investigate)) use individual members of the boards and
commissions to provide consultation and assistance with investigations
of all complaints or reports of unprofessional conduct as defined in
this chapter as requested by the secretary and to hold hearings as
provided in this chapter. If the secretary determines that the
complaint involves standards of practice or that clinical expertise is
necessary, the secretary shall assure that the board or commission is
actively involved in the investigation;
(3) To issue subpoenas and administer oaths in connection with any
investigation, hearing, or proceeding held under this chapter;
(4) To take or cause depositions to be taken and use other
discovery procedures as needed in any investigation, hearing, or
proceeding held under this chapter;
(5) To compel attendance of witnesses at hearings;
(6) In the course of ((investigating)) consulting and assisting
with the investigation of a complaint or report of unprofessional
conduct, to conduct practice reviews as requested by the secretary;
(7) ((To take emergency action ordering summary suspension of a
license, or restriction or limitation of the license holder's practice
pending proceedings by the disciplining authority. Consistent with RCW
18.130.370, a disciplining authority shall issue a summary suspension
of the license or temporary practice permit of a license holder
prohibited from practicing a health care profession in another state,
federal, or foreign jurisdiction because of an act of unprofessional
conduct that is substantially equivalent to an act of unprofessional
conduct prohibited by this chapter or any of the chapters specified in
RCW 18.130.040. The summary suspension remains in effect until
proceedings by the Washington disciplining authority have been
completed;)) To use a presiding officer as authorized in RCW 18.130.095(3)
or the office of administrative hearings as authorized in chapter 34.12
RCW to conduct hearings. The disciplining authority shall make the
final decision regarding disposition of the license unless the
disciplining authority elects to delegate in writing the final decision
to the presiding officer;
(8)
(((9))) (8) To use individual members of the boards to ((direct))
provide consultation and assistance with investigations as requested by
the secretary. However, the member of the board shall not subsequently
participate in the hearing of the case;
(((10))) (9) To enter into contracts for professional services
determined to be necessary for adequate enforcement of this chapter;
(((11))) (10) To contract with licensees or other persons or
organizations to provide services necessary for the monitoring and
supervision of licensees who are placed on probation, whose
professional activities are restricted, or who are for any authorized
purpose subject to monitoring by the disciplining authority;
(((12))) (11) To adopt standards of professional conduct or
practice;
(((13))) (12) To grant or deny license applications, and in the
event of a finding of unprofessional conduct by an applicant or license
holder, to impose any sanction against a license applicant or license
holder provided by this chapter. After January 1, 2008, all sanctions
must be issued in accordance with section 10 of this act;
(((14))) (13) To designate individuals authorized to sign subpoenas
and statements of charges;
(((15))) (14) To establish panels consisting of three or more
members of the board to perform any duty or authority within the
board's jurisdiction under this chapter;
(((16))) (15) To review and audit the records of licensed health
facilities' or services' quality assurance committee decisions in which
a licensee's practice privilege or employment is terminated or
restricted. Each health facility or service shall produce and make
accessible to the disciplining authority the appropriate records and
otherwise facilitate the review and audit. Information so gained shall
not be subject to discovery or introduction into evidence in any civil
action pursuant to RCW 70.41.200(3).
Sec. 3 RCW 18.130.060 and 2006 c 99 s 1 are each amended to read
as follows:
In addition to the authority specified in RCW 18.130.050, the
secretary has the following additional authority:
(1) To employ such investigative, administrative, and clerical
staff as necessary for the enforcement of this chapter. The secretary
must, whenever practical, make primary assignments on a long-term basis
to foster the development and maintenance of staff expertise. To
ensure continuity and best practices, the secretary will regularly
evaluate staff assignments and workload distribution;
(2) Upon the request of a board or commission, to appoint pro tem
members to participate as members of a panel of the board or commission
in connection with proceedings specifically identified in the request.
Individuals so appointed must meet the same minimum qualifications as
regular members of the board or commission. Pro tem members appointed
for matters under this chapter are appointed for a term of no more than
one year. No pro tem member may serve more than four one-year terms.
While serving as board or commission members pro tem, persons so
appointed have all the powers, duties, and immunities, and are entitled
to the emoluments, including travel expenses in accordance with RCW
43.03.050 and 43.03.060, of regular members of the board or commission.
The chairperson of a panel shall be a regular member of the board or
commission appointed by the board or commission chairperson. Panels
have authority to act as directed by the board or commission with
respect to ((all matters concerning the review, investigation, and
adjudication of)) all complaints, allegations, charges, and matters
subject to the jurisdiction of the board or commission and within the
authority of the board or commission. The authority to act through
panels does not restrict the authority of the board or commission to
act as a single body at any phase of proceedings within the board's or
commission's jurisdiction. Board or commission panels may make interim
orders and issue final decisions with respect to matters and cases
delegated to the panel by the board or commission. Final decisions may
be appealed as provided in chapter 34.05 RCW, the administrative
procedure act;
(3) To establish fees to be paid for witnesses, expert witnesses,
and consultants used in any investigation and to establish fees to
witnesses in any agency adjudicative proceeding as authorized by RCW
34.05.446;
(4) To conduct investigations and practice reviews ((at the
direction of the disciplining authority)) and to issue subpoenas,
administer oaths, and take depositions in the course of conducting
those investigations and practice reviews ((at the direction of the
disciplining authority)). The secretary may request the consultation
and assistance of the appropriate disciplining authority, and where
standards of practice or clinical expertise is necessary, the secretary
shall assure that the board or commission is actively involved in the
investigation;
(5) To review results of investigations conducted under this
chapter and determine the appropriate disposition, which may include
closure, notice of correction, stipulations permitted by RCW
18.130.172, or issuance of a statement of charges;
(6) To take emergency action ordering summary suspension of a
license, or restriction or limitation of the license holder's practice
pending proceedings by the disciplining authority. Consistent with RCW
18.130.370, the secretary shall issue a summary suspension of the
license or temporary practice permit of a license holder prohibited
from practicing a health care profession in another state, federal, or
foreign jurisdiction because of an act of unprofessional conduct that
is substantially equivalent to an act of unprofessional conduct
prohibited by this chapter or any of the chapters specified in RCW
18.130.040. The summary suspension remains in effect until proceedings
by the Washington disciplining authority have been completed;
(7) To have the health professions regulatory program establish a
system to recruit potential public members, to review the
qualifications of such potential members, and to provide orientation to
those public members appointed pursuant to law by the governor or the
secretary to the boards and commissions specified in RCW
18.130.040(2)(b), and to the advisory committees and councils for
professions specified in RCW 18.130.040(2)(a); and
(((6))) (8) To adopt rules, in consultation with the disciplining
authorities, requiring every license holder to report information
identified in RCW 18.130.070.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 4 A new section is added to chapter 18.130 RCW
to read as follows:
(1)(a) The department shall establish requirements for each
applicant for an initial license to obtain a state background check
through the state patrol prior to the issuance of any license. The
background check may be fingerprint-based at the discretion of the
department.
(b) The department shall specify those situations where a
background check under (a) of this subsection is inadequate and an
applicant for an initial license must obtain an electronic fingerprint-based national background check through the state patrol and federal
bureau of investigation. Situations where a background check is
inadequate may include instances where an applicant has recently lived
out-of-state or where the applicant has a criminal record in
Washington. The secretary shall issue a temporary practice permit to
an applicant who must have a national background check conducted if the
background check conducted under (a) of this subsection does not reveal
a criminal record in Washington, and if the applicant meets the
provisions of RCW 18.130.075.
(2) The department shall adopt rules to require license holders to
report to the disciplining authority any arrests, convictions, or other
determinations or findings by a law enforcement agency occurring after
the effective date of this section for a criminal offense. The report
must be made within fourteen days of the conviction.
(3) The department shall conduct an annual review of a
representative sample of all license holders who have previously
obtained a background check through the department. The selection of
the license holders to be reviewed shall be representative of all
categories of license holders and geographic locations.
(4)(a) When deciding whether or not to issue an initial license,
the disciplining authority shall consider the results of any background
check conducted pursuant to subsection (1) of this section that reveals
a conviction for any criminal offense that constitutes unprofessional
conduct under this chapter or the chapters specified in RCW
18.130.040(2) or a series of arrests that when considered together
demonstrate a pattern of behavior that, without investigation, may pose
a risk to the safety of the license holder's patients.
(b) If the background check conducted pursuant to subsection (3) of
this section reveals any information related to unprofessional conduct
that has not been previously disclosed to the disciplining authority,
it shall take appropriate disciplinary action against the license
holder.
(5) The department shall:
(a) Require the applicant or license holder to submit full sets of
fingerprints if necessary to complete the background check;
(b) Require the applicant to submit any fees for background check
activities conducted pursuant to subsection (1) of this section, except
as precluded by RCW 43.70.110, and other information required by the
state patrol;
(c) Notify the applicant of the results of the background check.
If any background check reveals a criminal record, the department shall
send the applicant a copy of the record upon request; and
(d) Restrict use of the background check results to determining the
individual's suitability for a license and to conducting disciplinary
functions.
Sec. 5 RCW 18.130.080 and 2006 c 99 s 5 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) ((A person, including but not limited to consumers, licensees,
corporations, organizations, health care facilities, impaired
practitioner programs, or voluntary substance abuse monitoring programs
approved by disciplining authorities, and state and local governmental
agencies,)) (a) An individual, an impaired practitioner program, or a
voluntary substance abuse monitoring program approved by a disciplining
authority, may submit a written complaint to the ((disciplining
authority)) secretary charging a license holder or applicant with
unprofessional conduct and specifying the grounds therefor or to report
information to the ((disciplining authority)) secretary, or voluntary
substance abuse monitoring program, or an impaired practitioner program
approved by the disciplining authority, which indicates that the
license holder may not be able to practice his or her profession with
reasonable skill and safety to consumers as a result of a mental or
physical condition.
(b)(i) Every license holder, corporation, organization, health care
facility, and state and local governmental agency that employs a
license holder shall report to the secretary when any license holder's
services have been terminated or restricted based upon a determination
that the license holder has either committed an act or acts that may
constitute unprofessional conduct or that the license holder may not be
able to practice his or her profession with reasonable skill and safety
to consumers as a result of a mental or physical condition.
(ii) All reports required by (b)(i) of this subsection must be
submitted to the secretary as soon as possible, but no later than
twenty days after a determination has been made. A report should
contain the following information, if known:
(A) The name, address, and telephone number of the person making
the report;
(B) The name, address, and telephone number of the license holder
being reported;
(C) The case number of any patient whose treatment is the subject
of the report;
(D) A brief description or summary of the facts that gave rise to
the issuance of the report, including dates of occurrences;
(E) If court action is involved, the name of the court in which the
action is filed, the date of filing, and the docket number; and
(F) Any further information that would aid in the evaluation of the
report.
(iii) Mandatory reports required by (b)(i) of this subsection are
exempt from public inspection and copying to the extent permitted under
chapter 42.56 RCW or to the extent that public inspection or copying of
the report would invade or violate a person's right to privacy as set
forth in RCW 42.56.050.
(2) If the ((disciplining authority)) secretary determines that
((the)) a complaint submitted under subsection (1) of this section
merits investigation, or if the ((disciplining authority)) secretary
has reason to believe, without a formal complaint, that a license
holder or applicant may have engaged in unprofessional conduct, the
((disciplining authority)) secretary shall investigate to determine
whether there has been unprofessional conduct. In determining whether
or not to investigate, the ((disciplining authority)) secretary shall
consider any prior complaints received by the ((disciplining
authority)) secretary, any prior findings of fact under RCW 18.130.110,
any stipulations to informal disposition under RCW 18.130.172, and any
comparable action taken by other state disciplining authorities.
(((2))) (3) Notwithstanding subsection (((1))) (2) of this section,
the ((disciplining authority)) secretary shall initiate an
investigation in every instance where:
(a) The ((disciplining authority)) secretary receives information
that a health care provider has been disqualified from participating in
the federal medicare program, under Title XVIII of the federal social
security act, or the federal medicaid program, under Title XIX of the
federal social security act; or
(b) There is a pattern of complaints, arrests, or other actions
that may not have resulted in a formal adjudication of wrongdoing, but
when considered together demonstrate a pattern of similar conduct that,
without investigation, may pose a risk to the safety of the license
holder's patients.
(4) Failure of an entity to submit a mandatory report to the
secretary under subsection (1)(b) of this section is punishable by a
civil penalty not to exceed five hundred dollars and constitutes
unprofessional conduct.
(5) If a report has been made by a hospital to the department under
RCW 70.41.210, a report to the secretary under subsection (1)(b) of
this section is not required.
(((3) A person who files a complaint or reports information under
this section in good faith is immune from suit in any civil action
related to the filing or contents of the complaint.)) (6) A person is
immune from civil liability, whether direct or derivative, for
providing information in good faith to the secretary under this
section.
Sec. 6 RCW 18.130.090 and 1993 c 367 s 1 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) If the ((disciplining authority)) secretary determines, upon
investigation, that there is reason to believe a violation of RCW
18.130.180 has occurred, a statement of charge or charges shall be
prepared and served upon the license holder or applicant at the
earliest practical time. The statement of charge or charges shall be
accompanied by a notice that the license holder or applicant may
request a hearing to contest the charge or charges. The license holder
or applicant must file a request for hearing with the disciplining
authority within twenty days after being served the statement of
charges. If the twenty-day limit results in a hardship upon the
license holder or applicant, he or she may request for good cause an
extension not to exceed sixty additional days. If the disciplining
authority finds that there is good cause, it shall grant the extension.
The failure to request a hearing constitutes a default, whereupon the
disciplining authority may enter a decision on the basis of the facts
available to it.
(2) If a hearing is requested, the time of the hearing shall be
fixed by the disciplining authority as soon as convenient, but the
hearing shall not be held earlier than thirty days after service of the
charges upon the license holder or applicant.
Sec. 7 RCW 18.130.160 and 2006 c 99 s 6 and 2006 c 8 s 104 are
each reenacted and amended to read as follows:
Upon a finding, after hearing, that a license holder or applicant
has committed unprofessional conduct or is unable to practice with
reasonable skill and safety due to a physical or mental condition, the
disciplining authority ((may consider the imposition of sanctions,
taking into account)) shall issue an order including sanctions adopted
in accordance with the schedule adopted under section 10 of this act
giving proper consideration to any prior findings of fact under RCW
18.130.110, any stipulations to informal disposition under RCW
18.130.172, and any action taken by other in-state or out-of-state
disciplining authorities((, and issue an)). The order ((providing))
must provide for one or any combination of the following, as directed
by the schedule:
(1) Revocation of the license;
(2) Suspension of the license for a fixed or indefinite term;
(3) Restriction or limitation of the practice;
(4) Requiring the satisfactory completion of a specific program of
remedial education or treatment;
(5) The monitoring of the practice by a supervisor approved by the
disciplining authority;
(6) Censure or reprimand;
(7) Compliance with conditions of probation for a designated period
of time;
(8) Payment of a fine for each violation of this chapter, not to
exceed five thousand dollars per violation. Funds received shall be
placed in the health professions account;
(9) Denial of the license request;
(10) Corrective action;
(11) Refund of fees billed to and collected from the consumer;
(12) A surrender of the practitioner's license in lieu of other
sanctions, which must be reported to the federal data bank.
Any of the actions under this section may be totally or partly
stayed by the disciplining authority. Safeguarding the public's health
and safety is the paramount responsibility of every disciplining
authority ((and)). In determining what action is appropriate, the
disciplining authority must consider the schedule adopted under section
10 of this act. Where the schedule allows flexibility in determining
the appropriate sanction, the disciplining authority must first
consider what sanctions are necessary to protect or compensate the
public. Only after such provisions have been made may the disciplining
authority consider and include in the order requirements designed to
rehabilitate the license holder or applicant. All costs associated
with compliance with orders issued under this section are the
obligation of the license holder or applicant.
The disciplining authority may determine that a case presents
unique circumstances that the schedule adopted under section 10 of this
act does not adequately address. The disciplining authority may
deviate from the schedule adopted under section 10 of this act when
selecting appropriate sanctions, but the disciplining authority must
issue a written explanation of the basis for not following the
schedule.
The ((licensee)) license holder or applicant may enter into a
stipulated disposition of charges that includes one or more of the
sanctions of this section, but only after a statement of charges has
been issued and the ((licensee)) license holder has been afforded the
opportunity for a hearing and has elected on the record to forego such
a hearing. The stipulation shall either contain one or more specific
findings of unprofessional conduct or inability to practice, or a
statement by the ((licensee)) license holder acknowledging that
evidence is sufficient to justify one or more specified findings of
unprofessional conduct or inability to practice. The stipulation
entered into pursuant to this subsection shall be considered formal
disciplinary action for all purposes.
Sec. 8 RCW 18.130.170 and 1995 c 336 s 8 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) If the ((disciplining authority)) secretary believes a license
holder or applicant may be unable to practice with reasonable skill and
safety to consumers by reason of any mental or physical condition, a
statement of charges in the name of the ((disciplining authority))
secretary shall be served on the license holder or applicant and notice
shall also be issued providing an opportunity for a hearing. The
hearing shall be limited to the sole issue of the capacity of the
license holder or applicant to practice with reasonable skill and
safety. If the disciplining authority determines that the license
holder or applicant is unable to practice with reasonable skill and
safety for one of the reasons stated in this subsection, the
disciplining authority shall impose such sanctions under RCW 18.130.160
as is deemed necessary to protect the public.
(2)(a) In investigating or adjudicating a complaint or report that
a license holder or applicant may be unable to practice with reasonable
skill or safety by reason of any mental or physical condition, the
((disciplining authority)) secretary may require a license holder or
applicant to submit to a mental or physical examination by one or more
licensed or certified health professionals designated by the
((disciplining authority)) secretary. The license holder or applicant
shall be provided written notice of the ((disciplining authority's))
secretary's intent to order a mental or physical examination, which
notice shall include: (i) A statement of the specific conduct, event,
or circumstances justifying an examination; (ii) a summary of the
evidence supporting the ((disciplining authority's)) secretary's
concern that the license holder or applicant may be unable to practice
with reasonable skill and safety by reason of a mental or physical
condition, and the grounds for believing such evidence to be credible
and reliable; (iii) a statement of the nature, purpose, scope, and
content of the intended examination; (iv) a statement that the license
holder or applicant has the right to respond in writing within twenty
days to challenge the ((disciplining authority's)) secretary's grounds
for ordering an examination or to challenge the manner or form of the
examination; and (v) a statement that if the license holder or
applicant timely responds to the notice of intent, then the license
holder or applicant will not be required to submit to the examination
while the response is under consideration.
(b) Upon submission of a timely response to the notice of intent to
order a mental or physical examination, the license holder or applicant
shall have an opportunity to respond to or refute such an order by
submission of evidence or written argument or both. The evidence and
written argument supporting and opposing the mental or physical
examination shall be reviewed by either a panel of the disciplining
authority members who have not been involved with the allegations
against the license holder or applicant or a neutral decision maker
approved by the disciplining authority. The reviewing panel of the
disciplining authority or the approved neutral decision maker may, in
its discretion, ask for oral argument from the parties. The reviewing
panel of the disciplining authority or the approved neutral decision
maker shall prepare a written decision as to whether: There is
reasonable cause to believe that the license holder or applicant may be
unable to practice with reasonable skill and safety by reason of a
mental or physical condition, or the manner or form of the mental or
physical examination is appropriate, or both.
(c) Upon receipt by the ((disciplining authority)) secretary of the
written decision, or upon the failure of the license holder or
applicant to timely respond to the notice of intent, the ((disciplining
authority)) secretary may issue an order requiring the license holder
or applicant to undergo a mental or physical examination. All such
mental or physical examinations shall be narrowly tailored to address
only the alleged mental or physical condition and the ability of the
license holder or applicant to practice with reasonable skill and
safety. An order of the ((disciplining authority)) secretary requiring
the license holder or applicant to undergo a mental or physical
examination is not a final order for purposes of appeal. The cost of
the examinations ordered by the ((disciplining authority)) secretary
shall be paid out of the health professions account. In addition to
any examinations ordered by the ((disciplining authority)) secretary,
the ((licensee)) license holder may submit physical or mental
examination reports from licensed or certified health professionals of
the license holder's or applicant's choosing and expense.
(d) If the disciplining authority finds that a license holder or
applicant has failed to submit to a properly ordered mental or physical
examination, then the disciplining authority may order appropriate
action or discipline under RCW 18.130.180(9), unless the failure was
due to circumstances beyond the person's control. However, no such
action or discipline may be imposed unless the license holder or
applicant has had the notice and opportunity to challenge the
((disciplining authority's)) secretary's grounds for ordering the
examination, to challenge the manner and form, to assert any other
defenses, and to have such challenges or defenses considered by either
a panel of the disciplining authority members who have not been
involved with the allegations against the license holder or applicant
or a neutral decision maker approved by the disciplining authority, as
previously set forth in this section. Further, the action or
discipline ordered by the disciplining authority shall not be more
severe than a suspension of the license, certification, registration or
application until such time as the license holder or applicant complies
with the properly ordered mental or physical examination.
(e) Nothing in this section shall restrict the power of ((a
disciplining authority)) the secretary to act in an emergency under RCW
34.05.422(4), 34.05.479, and ((18.130.050(7))) 18.130.060(6).
(f) A determination by a court of competent jurisdiction that a
license holder or applicant is mentally incompetent or ((mentally ill))
an individual with mental illness is presumptive evidence of the
license holder's or applicant's inability to practice with reasonable
skill and safety. An individual affected under this section shall at
reasonable intervals be afforded an opportunity, at his or her expense,
to demonstrate that the individual can resume competent practice with
reasonable skill and safety to the consumer.
(3) For the purpose of subsection (2) of this section, an applicant
or license holder governed by this chapter, by making application,
practicing, or filing a license renewal, is deemed to have given
consent to submit to a mental, physical, or psychological examination
when directed in writing by the ((disciplining authority)) secretary
and further to have waived all objections to the admissibility or use
of the examining health professional's testimony or examination reports
by the ((disciplining authority)) secretary on the ground that the
testimony or reports constitute privileged communications.
Sec. 9 RCW 18.130.172 and 2000 c 171 s 29 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) Prior to serving a statement of charges under RCW 18.130.090 or
18.130.170, the ((disciplinary authority)) secretary may furnish a
statement of allegations to the licensee or applicant along with a
detailed summary of the evidence relied upon to establish the
allegations and a proposed stipulation for informal resolution of the
allegations. These documents shall be exempt from public disclosure
until such time as the allegations are resolved either by stipulation
or otherwise.
(2) The ((disciplinary)) disciplining authority and the applicant
or licensee may stipulate that the allegations may be disposed of
informally in accordance with this subsection. The stipulation shall
contain a statement of the facts leading to the filing of the
complaint; the act or acts of unprofessional conduct alleged to have
been committed or the alleged basis for determining that the applicant
or licensee is unable to practice with reasonable skill and safety; a
statement that the stipulation is not to be construed as a finding of
either unprofessional conduct or inability to practice; an
acknowledgement that a finding of unprofessional conduct or inability
to practice, if proven, constitutes grounds for discipline under this
chapter; and an agreement on the part of the licensee or applicant that
the sanctions set forth in RCW 18.130.160, except RCW 18.130.160 (1),
(2), (6), and (8), may be imposed as part of the stipulation, except
that no fine may be imposed but the licensee or applicant may agree to
reimburse the ((disciplinary authority)) secretary the costs of
investigation and processing the complaint up to an amount not
exceeding one thousand dollars per allegation; and an agreement on the
part of the ((disciplinary)) disciplining authority to forego further
disciplinary proceedings concerning the allegations. A stipulation
entered into pursuant to this subsection shall not be considered formal
disciplinary action.
(3) If the licensee or applicant declines to agree to disposition
of the charges by means of a stipulation pursuant to subsection (2) of
this section, the ((disciplinary authority)) secretary may proceed to
formal disciplinary action pursuant to RCW 18.130.090 or 18.130.170.
(4) Upon execution of a stipulation under subsection (2) of this
section by both the licensee or applicant and the ((disciplinary))
disciplining authority, the complaint is deemed disposed of and shall
become subject to public disclosure on the same basis and to the same
extent as other records of the ((disciplinary)) disciplining authority.
Should the licensee or applicant fail to pay any agreed reimbursement
within thirty days of the date specified in the stipulation for
payment, the ((disciplinary authority)) secretary may seek collection
of the amount agreed to be paid in the same manner as enforcement of a
fine under RCW 18.130.165.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 10 A new section is added to chapter 18.130
RCW to read as follows:
(1) The disciplining authorities identified in RCW 18.130.040(2)(b)
shall review the secretary's sanctioning guidelines and shall
collaborate to develop a schedule that defines appropriate ranges of
sanctions that are applicable upon a determination that a license
holder has committed unprofessional conduct as defined in this chapter
or the chapters specified in RCW 18.130.040(2). The schedule must
identify aggravating and mitigating circumstances that may enhance or
reduce the sanction imposed by the disciplining authority for
unprofessional conduct. The schedule must apply to all disciplining
authorities. In addition, the disciplining authorities shall make
provisions for instances in which there are multiple findings of
unprofessional conduct. When establishing the proposed schedule, the
disciplining authorities shall consider maintaining consistent sanction
determinations that maximize the protection of the public's health and
while maintaining the rights of health care providers of the different
health professions. The disciplining authorities shall submit the
proposed schedule and recommendations to modify or adopt the
secretary's guidelines to the secretary no later than November 15,
2007.
(2) The secretary shall adopt rules establishing a uniform sanction
schedule to be applied to all disciplinary actions commenced under this
chapter after January 1, 2008. The secretary shall review the proposed
schedule developed in accordance with subsection (1) of this section
and may modify the schedule as necessary to provide greater protection
to the public. The secretary shall use his or her emergency
rule-making authority pursuant to the procedures under chapter 34.05
RCW, to adopt rules that take effect no later than January 1, 2008, to
implement the schedule.
(3) The disciplining authority may determine that a case presents
unique circumstances that the schedule adopted under this section does
not adequately address. The disciplining authority may deviate from
the schedule adopted under this section when selecting appropriate
sanctions, but the disciplining authority must issue a written
explanation in the order of the basis for not following the schedule.
(4) The secretary shall report to the legislature by January 15,
2008, on the sanctioning schedule adopted.
Sec. 11 RCW 18.130.310 and 1989 1st ex.s. c 9 s 313 are each
amended to read as follows:
(1) Subject to RCW 40.07.040, the disciplinary authority shall
submit ((a biennial)) an annual report to the legislature on its
proceedings during the ((biennium)) year, detailing the number of
complaints made, investigated, and adjudicated and manner of
disposition. In addition, the report must provide data on the
department's background check activities conducted under section 4 of
this act and the effectiveness of those activities in identifying
potential license holders who may not be qualified to practice safely.
The report may include recommendations for improving the disciplinary
process, including proposed legislation. The department shall develop
a uniform report format.
(2) Each health profession board and commission identified in RCW
18.130.040(2)(b) shall submit an annual report to complement the report
required under subsection (1) of this section. Each report must
identify the disciplinary activities of the individual board or
commission, rule-making and policy activities, and receipts and
expenditures for the profession.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 12 A new section is added to chapter 18.130
RCW to read as follows:
To implement section 4 of this act, the department may increase
application and renewal fees by amounts that exceed the fiscal growth
factor under RCW 43.135.055.
Sec. 13 RCW 70.41.210 and 2005 c 470 s 1 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) The chief administrator or executive officer of a hospital
shall report to the department when the practice of a health care
practitioner as defined in subsection (2) of this section is
restricted, suspended, limited, or terminated based upon a conviction,
determination, or finding by the hospital that the health care
practitioner has committed an action defined as unprofessional conduct
under RCW 18.130.180. The chief administrator or executive officer
shall also report any voluntary restriction or termination of the
practice of a health care practitioner as defined in subsection (2) of
this section while the practitioner is under investigation or the
subject of a proceeding by the hospital regarding unprofessional
conduct, or in return for the hospital not conducting such an
investigation or proceeding or not taking action. The department will
forward the report to the appropriate disciplining authority.
(2) The reporting requirements apply to the following health care
practitioners: Pharmacists as defined in chapter 18.64 RCW; advanced
registered nurse practitioners as defined in chapter 18.79 RCW;
dentists as defined in chapter 18.32 RCW; naturopaths as defined in
chapter 18.36A RCW; optometrists as defined in chapter 18.53 RCW;
osteopathic physicians and surgeons as defined in chapter 18.57 RCW;
osteopathic ((physician [physicians'])) physicians' assistants as
defined in chapter 18.57A RCW; physicians as defined in chapter 18.71
RCW; physician assistants as defined in chapter 18.71A RCW; podiatric
physicians and surgeons as defined in chapter 18.22 RCW; and
psychologists as defined in chapter 18.83 RCW.
(3) Reports made under subsection (1) of this section shall be made
within fifteen days of the date: (a) A conviction, determination, or
finding is made by the hospital that the health care practitioner has
committed an action defined as unprofessional conduct under RCW
18.130.180; or (b) the voluntary restriction or termination of the
practice of a health care practitioner, including his or her voluntary
resignation, while under investigation or the subject of proceedings
regarding unprofessional conduct under RCW 18.130.180 is accepted by
the hospital.
(4) Failure of a hospital to comply with this section is punishable
by a civil penalty not to exceed ((two)) five hundred ((fifty))
dollars.
(5) A hospital, its chief administrator, or its executive officer
who files a report under this section is immune from suit, whether
direct or derivative, in any civil action related to the filing or
contents of the report, unless the conviction, determination, or
finding on which the report and its content are based is proven to not
have been made in good faith. The prevailing party in any action
brought alleging the conviction, determination, finding, or report was
not made in good faith, shall be entitled to recover the costs of
litigation, including reasonable attorneys' fees.
(6) The department shall forward reports made under subsection (1)
of this section to the appropriate disciplining authority designated
under Title 18 RCW within fifteen days of the date the report is
received by the department. The department shall notify a hospital
that has made a report under subsection (1) of this section of the
results of the disciplining authority's case disposition decision
within fifteen days after the case disposition. Case disposition is
the decision whether to issue a statement of charges, take informal
action, or close the complaint without action against a practitioner.
In its biennial report to the legislature under RCW 18.130.310, the
department shall specifically identify the case dispositions of reports
made by hospitals under subsection (1) of this section.
(7) The department shall not increase hospital license fees to
carry out this section before July 1, 2007.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 14 A new section is added to chapter 18.130
RCW to read as follows:
Any license holder performing a gynecological examination or
procedure must ensure that a third party is in the room where the
examination or procedure is being conducted, unless the patient signs
a written waiver of the right while the patient is competent to sign
such a waiver.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 15 (1) The Washington state medical quality
assurance commission shall conduct a clinical competency examination
pilot project. The project must:
(a) Be developed in consultation with the University of Washington
school of medicine;
(b) Establish the skills to be examined and measurement standards
and methods by which clinical competency is assessed; and
(c) Include criteria for determining when a clinical competency
examination may be required, including whether requiring the
examination will assist the Washington state medical quality assurance
commission in carrying out its duties, protecting the public, or
promoting quality assurance within the profession.
(2)(a) By December 1, 2007, the Washington state medical quality
assurance commission shall submit an interim report to the appropriate
committees of the legislature on the commission's progress in
developing clinical competency examinations and its plans for
implementation.
(b) By December 1, 2009, the Washington state medical quality
assurance commission shall submit a final report to the appropriate
committees of the legislature on the effectiveness of the clinical
competency examinations at identifying potentially harmful physicians
and its ability to avoid harm to the public through remedial measures
or other risk avoidance measures. The report must include data
regarding the types of procedures most frequently subject to the
program and the methods for identifying physicians in need of the
program. The report must also include recommendations as to whether
the program should be permanently implemented and whether the program
should be expanded to other professions and any considerations for
expanding the program.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 16 A new section is added to chapter 42.52 RCW
to read as follows:
Members of a health profession board or commission as identified in
RCW 18.130.040(2)(b) may express their professional opinions to an
elected official about the work of the board or commission on which the
member serves, even if those opinions differ from the department of
health's official position. Such communication shall be to inform the
elected official and not to lobby in support or opposition to any
initiative to the legislature.
Sec. 17 RCW 43.70.320 and 1993 c 492 s 411 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) There is created in the state treasury an account to be known
as the health professions account. All fees received by the department
for health professions licenses, registration, certifications,
renewals, or examinations and the civil penalties assessed and
collected by the department under RCW 18.130.190 shall be forwarded to
the state treasurer who shall credit such moneys to the health
professions account.
(2) All expenses incurred in carrying out the health professions
licensing activities of the department shall be paid from the account
as authorized by legislative appropriation, except as provided in
subsection (4) of this section. Any residue in the account shall be
accumulated and shall not revert to the general fund at the end of the
biennium.
(3) The secretary shall biennially prepare a budget request based
on the anticipated costs of administering the health professions
licensing activities of the department which shall include the
estimated income from health professions fees.
(4) The secretary may spend unappropriated funds in the health
professions account to meet unanticipated costs when revenues exceed
more than fifteen percent over the department's estimated six-year
spending projections. Unanticipated costs shall be limited to spending
as authorized in subsection (3) of this section for anticipated costs.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 18 Except for section 4 of this act, which
takes effect January 1, 2008, this act is necessary for the immediate
preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the
state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect
immediately.