BILL REQ. #: H-2362.1
State of Washington | 60th Legislature | 2007 Regular Session |
READ FIRST TIME 03/05/07.
AN ACT Relating to improving court hearings in dependency proceedings; amending RCW 13.34.060, 13.34.062, 13.34.065, 13.34.136, 13.34.138, and 13.34.145; and creating a new section.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 The legislature recognizes that the 2005
Washington state court improvement project re-assessment found that
Washington statutes fail to consistently address the health and safety
of children in care. Statutory language does not stress the safety and
welfare of the child as the paramount concerns. Additionally, the lack
of clarity in the statutes undermines the effectiveness of the hearings
and, ultimately, the safety and welfare of the child. The legislature
intends to clarify the purpose of the court hearings and the roles and
responsibilities of the parties.
The legislature finds that an investment of time into quality court
hearings results in better decisions for children and their families
and preserves the resources of the court and the child welfare system.
The legislature intends to clearly state that court hearings should
always strive to be independent, thorough, and timely inquiries into
the status of the case to ensure the department of social and health
services is responding to the needs of the family and child in a prompt
manner and that the case is progressing appropriately. The legislature
encourages the courts to develop clearer, stronger oversight and
leadership roles within the courts to achieve safe, timely permanency
for children. The court is encouraged to engage all parties to
question whether the case is progressing and, if not, to assist in
problem-solving to ensure progress is made towards permanency for the
child.
Sec. 2 RCW 13.34.060 and 2002 c 52 s 4 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) A child taken into custody pursuant to RCW 13.34.050 or
26.44.050 shall be immediately placed in shelter care. A child taken
by a relative of the child in violation of RCW 9A.40.060 or 9A.40.070
shall be placed in shelter care only when permitted under RCW
13.34.055. No child may be held longer than seventy-two hours,
excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, after such child is taken
into custody unless a court order has been entered for continued
shelter care. In no case may a child who is taken into custody
pursuant to RCW 13.34.055, 13.34.050, or 26.44.050 be detained in a
secure detention facility.
(((a))) (2) Unless there is reasonable cause to believe that the
health, safety, or welfare of the child would be jeopardized or that
the efforts to reunite the parent and child will be hindered, priority
placement for a child in shelter care, pending a court hearing, shall
be with any person described in RCW 74.15.020(2)(a). The person must
be willing and available to care for the child and be able to meet any
special needs of the child. The person must be willing to facilitate
the child's visitation with siblings, if such visitation is part of the
supervising agency's plan or is ordered by the court. If a child is
not initially placed with a relative pursuant to this section, the
supervising agency shall make an effort within available resources to
place the child with a relative on the next business day after the
child is taken into custody. The supervising agency shall document its
effort to place the child with a relative pursuant to this section.
Nothing within this subsection (((1)(a))) (2) establishes an
entitlement to services or a right to a particular placement.
(((b))) (3) Whenever a child is taken into custody pursuant to this
section, the supervising agency may authorize evaluations of the
child's physical or emotional condition and educational and
developmental status, routine medical and dental examination and care,
and all necessary emergency care. ((In no case may a child who is
taken into custody pursuant to RCW 13.34.055, 13.34.050, or 26.44.050
be detained in a secure detention facility. No child may be held
longer than seventy-two hours, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and
holidays, after such child is taken into custody unless a court order
has been entered for continued shelter care. The child and his or her
parent, guardian, or custodian shall be informed that they have a right
to a shelter care hearing. The court shall hold a shelter care hearing
within seventy-two hours after the child is taken into custody,
excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. If a parent, guardian, or
legal custodian desires to waive the shelter care hearing, the court
shall determine, on the record and with the parties present, whether
such waiver is knowing and voluntary.))
(2) Whenever a child is taken into custody by child protective
services pursuant to a court order issued under RCW 13.34.050 or when
child protective services is notified that a child has been taken into
custody pursuant to RCW 26.44.050 or 26.44.056, child protective
services shall make reasonable efforts to inform the parents, guardian,
or legal custodian of the fact that the child has been taken into
custody, the reasons why the child was taken into custody, and their
legal rights under this title as soon as possible and in no event shall
notice be provided more than twenty-four hours after the child has been
taken into custody or twenty-four hours after child protective services
has been notified that the child has been taken into custody. The
notice of custody and rights may be given by any means reasonably
certain of notifying the parents including, but not limited to,
written, telephone, or in person oral notification. If the initial
notification is provided by a means other than writing, child
protective services shall make reasonable efforts to also provide
written notification.
Sec. 3 RCW 13.34.062 and 2004 c 147 s 2 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1)(a) Whenever a child is taken into custody by child protective
services pursuant to a court order issued under RCW 13.34.050 or when
child protective services is notified that a child has been taken into
custody pursuant to RCW 26.44.050 or 26.44.056, child protective
services shall make reasonable efforts to inform the parent, guardian,
or legal custodian of the fact that the child has been taken into
custody, the reasons why the child was taken into custody, and their
legal rights under this title, including the right to a shelter care
hearing, as soon as possible.
(b) In no event shall the notice required by this section be
provided to the parent, guardian, or legal custodian more than twenty-four hours after the child has been taken into custody or twenty-four
hours after child protective services has been notified that the child
has been taken into custody.
(2)(a) The notice of custody and rights may be given by any means
reasonably certain of notifying the parents including, but not limited
to, written, telephone, or in person oral notification. If the initial
notification is provided by a means other than writing, child
protective services shall make reasonable efforts to also provide
written notification.
(b) The written notice of custody and rights required by ((RCW
13.34.060)) this section shall be in substantially the following form:
Sec. 4 RCW 13.34.065 and 2001 c 332 s 3 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1)(a) When a child is taken into custody, the court shall hold a
shelter care hearing within seventy-two hours, excluding Saturdays,
Sundays, and holidays. The primary purpose of the shelter care hearing
is to determine whether the child can be immediately and safely
returned home while the adjudication of the dependency is pending.
(b) Any parent, guardian, or legal custodian who for good cause is
unable to attend the shelter care hearing may request that a subsequent
shelter care hearing be scheduled. The request shall be made to the
clerk of the court where the petition is filed prior to the initial
shelter care hearing. Upon the request of the parent, the court shall
schedule the hearing within seventy-two hours of the request, excluding
Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. The clerk shall notify all other
parties of the hearing by any reasonable means.
(2)(a) The ((juvenile court probation counselor)) department of
social and health services shall submit a recommendation to the court
as to the further need for shelter care ((unless the petition has been
filed by the department, in which case the recommendation shall be
submitted by the department)) in all cases in which it is the
petitioner. In all other cases, the recommendation shall be submitted
by the juvenile court probation counselor.
(b) All parties have the right to present testimony to the court
regarding the need or lack of need for shelter care.
(c) Hearsay evidence before the court regarding the need or lack of
need for shelter care must be supported by sworn testimony, affidavit,
or declaration of the person offering such evidence.
(3)(a) At the commencement of the hearing, the court shall notify
the parent, guardian, or custodian of the following:
(i) The parent, guardian, or custodian has the right to a shelter
care hearing;
(ii) The nature of the shelter care hearing and the proceedings
that will follow; and
(iii) If the parent, guardian, or custodian is not represented by
counsel, the right to be represented. If the parent, guardian, or
custodian is indigent, the court shall appoint counsel as provided in
RCW 13.34.090.
(b) If a parent, guardian, or legal custodian desires to waive the
shelter care hearing, the court shall determine, on the record and with
the parties present, whether such waiver is knowing and voluntary.
Regardless of whether the court accepts the parental waiver of the
shelter care hearing, the court must make the finding required under
subsection (4) of this section.
(4) At the shelter care hearing the court shall examine the need
for shelter care and inquire into the status of the case. The
paramount consideration for the court shall be the health, welfare, and
safety of the child. At a minimum, the court shall inquire into the
following:
(a) Whether the notice required under RCW 13.34.062 was given to
all known parents, guardians, or legal custodians of the child. The
court shall make an express finding as to whether the notice required
under RCW 13.34.062 was given to the parent, guardian, or legal
custodian. If actual notice was not given to the parent, guardian, or
legal custodian and the whereabouts of such person is known or can be
ascertained, the court shall order the supervising agency or the
department of social and health services to make reasonable efforts to
advise the parent, guardian, or legal custodian of the status of the
case, including the date and time of any subsequent hearings, and their
rights under RCW 13.34.090;
(b) Whether the child can be safely returned home while the
adjudication of the dependency is pending;
(c) What efforts have been made to place the child with a relative;
(d) What services were provided to the family to prevent or
eliminate the need for removal of the child from the child's home;
(e) Is the placement proposed by the agency the least disruptive
and most family-like setting that meets the needs of the child;
(f) Whether it is in the best interest of the child to remain
enrolled in the school, developmental program, or child care the child
was in prior to placement;
(g) Appointment of a guardian ad litem or attorney;
(h) Whether the child is or may be an Indian child as defined in 25
U.S.C. Sec. 1903, whether the provisions of the Indian child welfare
act apply, and whether there is compliance with the Indian child
welfare act, including notice to the child's tribe;
(i) Whether restraining orders, or orders expelling an allegedly
abusive parent from the home, will allow the child to safely remain in
the home;
(j) Whether any orders for examinations, evaluations, or immediate
services are needed;
(k) The terms and conditions for parental and sibling visitation.
(((2))) (5)(a) The court shall release a child alleged to be
dependent to the care, custody, and control of the child's parent,
guardian, or legal custodian unless the court finds there is reasonable
cause to believe that:
(((a))) (i) After consideration of the specific services that have
been provided, reasonable efforts have been made to prevent or
eliminate the need for removal of the child from the child's home and
to make it possible for the child to return home; and
(((b)(i))) (ii)(A) The child has no parent, guardian, or legal
custodian to provide supervision and care for such child; or
(((ii))) (B) The release of such child would present a serious
threat of substantial harm to such child; or
(((iii))) (C) The parent, guardian, or custodian to whom the child
could be released has been charged with violating RCW 9A.40.060 or
9A.40.070.
(b) If the court does not release the child to his or her parent,
guardian, or legal custodian, and the child was initially placed with
a relative pursuant to RCW 13.34.060(1), the court shall order
continued placement with a relative, unless there is reasonable cause
to believe the health, safety, or welfare of the child would be
jeopardized or that the efforts to reunite the parent and child will be
hindered. The relative must be willing and available to:
(i) Care for the child and be able to meet any special needs of the
child;
(ii) Facilitate the child's visitation with siblings, if such
visitation is part of the supervising agency's plan or is ordered by
the court; and
(iii) Cooperate with the department in providing necessary
background checks and home studies.
(c) If the child was not initially placed with a relative, and the
court does not release the child to his or her parent, guardian, or
legal custodian, the supervising agency shall make reasonable efforts
to locate a relative pursuant to RCW 13.34.060(1).
(d) If a relative is not available, the court shall order continued
shelter care or order placement with another suitable person, and the
court shall set forth its reasons for the order. ((The court shall
enter a finding as to whether RCW 13.34.060(2) and subsections (1) and
(2) of this section have been complied with. If actual notice was not
given to the parent, guardian, or legal custodian and the whereabouts
of such person is known or can be ascertained, the court shall order
the supervising agency or the department of social and health services
to make reasonable efforts to advise the parent, guardian, or legal
custodian of the status of the case, including the date and time of any
subsequent hearings, and their rights under RCW 13.34.090.)) If the court orders placement of the child with a person not
related to the child and not licensed to provide foster care, the
placement is subject to all terms and conditions of this section that
apply to relative placements.
(3)
(e) Any placement with a relative, or other person approved by the
court pursuant to this section, shall be contingent upon cooperation
with the agency case plan and compliance with court orders related to
the care and supervision of the child including, but not limited to,
court orders regarding parent-child contacts, sibling contacts, and any
other conditions imposed by the court. Noncompliance with the case
plan or court order is grounds for removal of the child from the home
of the relative or other person, subject to review by the court.
(6)(a) A shelter care order issued pursuant to this section shall
include the requirement for a case conference as provided in RCW
13.34.067. However, if the parent is not present at the shelter care
hearing, or does not agree to the case conference, the court shall not
include the requirement for the case conference in the shelter care
order.
(b) If the court orders a case conference, the shelter care order
shall include notice to all parties and establish the date, time, and
location of the case conference which shall be no later than thirty
days before the fact-finding hearing.
(c) The court may order another conference, case staffing, or
hearing as an alternative to the case conference required under RCW
13.34.067 so long as the conference, case staffing, or hearing ordered
by the court meets all requirements under RCW 13.34.067, including the
requirement of a written agreement specifying the services to be
provided to the parent.
(7)(a) A shelter care order issued pursuant to this section may be
amended at any time with notice and hearing thereon. The shelter care
decision of placement shall be modified only upon a showing of change
in circumstances. No child may be placed in shelter care for longer
than thirty days without an order, signed by the judge, authorizing
continued shelter care.
(b)(i) An order releasing the child on any conditions specified in
this section may at any time be amended, with notice and hearing
thereon, so as to return the child to shelter care for failure of the
parties to conform to the conditions originally imposed.
(ii) The court shall consider whether nonconformance with any
conditions resulted from circumstances beyond the control of the
parent, guardian, or legal custodian and give weight to that fact
before ordering return of the child to shelter care.
(((4))) (8)(a) If a child is returned home from shelter care a
second time in the case, or if the supervisor of the caseworker deems
it necessary, the multidisciplinary team may be reconvened.
(((5))) (b) If a child is returned home from shelter care a second
time in the case a law enforcement officer must be present and file a
report to the department.
Sec. 5 RCW 13.34.136 and 2004 c 146 s 1 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) Whenever a child is ordered removed from the child's home, a
permanency plan shall be developed no later than sixty days from the
time the supervising agency assumes responsibility for providing
services, including placing the child, or at the time of a hearing
under RCW 13.34.130, whichever occurs first. The permanency planning
process continues until a permanency planning goal is achieved or
dependency is dismissed. The planning process shall include reasonable
efforts to return the child to the parent's home.
(2) The agency charged with ((his or her)) care of the child shall
provide the court with a written permanency plan of care directed
towards securing a safe, stable, and permanent home for the child as
soon as possible. The permanency plan shall include:
(a) A permanency plan of care that shall identify one of the
following outcomes as a primary goal and may identify additional
outcomes as alternative goals: Return of the child to the home of the
child's parent, guardian, or legal custodian; adoption; guardianship;
permanent legal custody; long-term relative or foster care, until the
child is age eighteen, with a written agreement between the parties and
the care provider; successful completion of a responsible living skills
program; or independent living, if appropriate and if the child is age
sixteen or older. The department shall not discharge a child to an
independent living situation before the child is eighteen years of age
unless the child becomes emancipated pursuant to chapter 13.64 RCW;
(b) Unless the court has ordered, pursuant to RCW 13.34.130(4),
that a termination petition be filed, a specific plan as to where the
child will be placed, what steps will be taken to return the child
home, what steps the agency will take to promote existing appropriate
sibling relationships and/or facilitate placement together or contact
in accordance with the best interests of each child, and what actions
the agency will take to maintain parent-child ties. All aspects of the
plan shall include the goal of achieving permanence for the child.
(i) The agency plan shall specify what services the parents will be
offered to enable them to resume custody, what requirements the parents
must meet to resume custody, and a time limit for each service plan and
parental requirement.
(ii) Visitation is the right of the family, including the child and
the parent, in cases in which visitation is in the best interest of the
child. Early, consistent, and frequent visitation is crucial for
maintaining parent-child relationships and making it possible for
parents and children to safely reunify. The agency shall encourage the
maximum parent and child and sibling contact possible, when it is in
the best interest of the child, including regular visitation and
participation by the parents in the care of the child while the child
is in placement. Visitation shall not be limited as a sanction for a
parent's failure to comply with court orders or services where the
health, safety, or welfare of the child is not at risk as a result of
the visitation. Visitation may be limited or denied only if the court
determines that such limitation or denial is necessary to protect the
child's health, safety, or welfare. The court and the agency should
rely upon community resources, relatives, foster parents, and other
appropriate persons to provide transportation and supervision for
visitation to the extent that such resources are available, and
appropriate, and the child's safety would not be compromised.
(iii) A child shall be placed as close to the child's home as
possible, preferably in the child's own neighborhood, unless the court
finds that placement at a greater distance is necessary to promote the
child's or parents' well-being.
(iv) The plan should ensure the child remains enrolled in the
school the child was attending at the time the child entered foster
care whenever it is practical and in the best interest of the child.
(v) The agency charged with supervising a child in placement shall
provide all reasonable services that are available within the agency,
or within the community, or those services which the department has
existing contracts to purchase. It shall report to the court if it is
unable to provide such services; and
(c) If the court has ordered, pursuant to RCW 13.34.130(4), that a
termination petition be filed, a specific plan as to where the child
will be placed, what steps will be taken to achieve permanency for the
child, services to be offered or provided to the child, and, if
visitation would be in the best interests of the child, a
recommendation to the court regarding visitation between parent and
child pending a fact-finding hearing on the termination petition. The
agency shall not be required to develop a plan of services for the
parents or provide services to the parents if the court orders a
termination petition be filed. However, reasonable efforts to ensure
visitation and contact between siblings shall be made unless there is
reasonable cause to believe the best interests of the child or siblings
would be jeopardized.
(((2))) (3) Permanency planning goals should be achieved at the
earliest possible date, preferably before the child has been in out-of-home care for fifteen months. In cases where parental rights have been
terminated, the child is legally free for adoption, and adoption has
been identified as the primary permanency planning goal, it shall be a
goal to complete the adoption within six months following entry of the
termination order.
(4) If the court determines that the continuation of reasonable
efforts to prevent or eliminate the need to remove the child from his
or her home or to safely return the child home should not be part of
the permanency plan of care for the child, reasonable efforts shall be
made to place the child in a timely manner and to complete whatever
steps are necessary to finalize the permanent placement of the child.
(((3))) (5) The identified outcomes and goals of the permanency
plan may change over time based upon the circumstances of the
particular case.
(6) The court shall consider the child's relationships with the
child's siblings in accordance with RCW 13.34.130(3).
(7) For purposes related to permanency planning:
(a) "Guardianship" means a dependency guardianship or a legal
guardianship pursuant to chapter 11.88 RCW or equivalent laws of
another state or a federally recognized Indian tribe.
(b) "Permanent custody order" means a custody order entered
pursuant to chapter 26.10 RCW.
(c) "Permanent legal custody" means legal custody pursuant to
chapter 26.10 RCW or equivalent laws of another state or a federally
recognized Indian tribe.
Sec. 6 RCW 13.34.138 and 2005 c 512 s 3 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) Except for children whose cases are reviewed by a citizen
review board under chapter 13.70 RCW, the status of all children found
to be dependent shall be reviewed by the court at least every six
months from the beginning date of the placement episode or the date
dependency is established, whichever is first((, at a)). The purpose
of the hearing ((in which it)) shall be ((determined)) to review the
progress of the parties and determine whether court supervision should
continue.
(a) The initial review hearing shall be an in-court review and
shall be set six months from the beginning date of the placement
episode or no more than ninety days from the entry of the disposition
order, whichever comes first. The requirements for the initial review
hearing, including the in-court review requirement, shall be
accomplished within existing resources.
(b) The supervising agency shall provide a foster parent,
preadoptive parent, or relative with notice of, and his or her right to
an opportunity to be heard in, a review hearing pertaining to the
child, but only if that person is currently providing care to the child
at the time of the hearing. This section shall not be construed to
grant party status to any person who has been provided an opportunity
to be heard.
(c) The initial review hearing may be a permanency planning hearing
when necessary to meet the time frames set forth in RCW
13.34.145(((3))) (1)(a) or 13.34.134. ((The review shall include
findings regarding the agency and parental completion of disposition
plan requirements, and if necessary, revised permanency time limits.
This review shall consider both the agency's and parent's efforts that
demonstrate consistent measurable progress over time in meeting the
disposition plan requirements. The requirements for the initial review
hearing, including the in-court requirement, shall be accomplished
within existing resources. The supervising agency shall provide a
foster parent, preadoptive parent, or relative with notice of, and
their right to an opportunity to be heard in, a review hearing
pertaining to the child, but only if that person is currently providing
care to that child at the time of the hearing. This section shall not
be construed to grant party status to any person who has been provided
an opportunity to be heard.))
(2)(a) A child shall not be returned home at the review hearing
unless the court finds that a reason for removal as set forth in RCW
13.34.130 no longer exists. The parents, guardian, or legal custodian
shall report to the court the efforts they have made to correct the
conditions which led to removal. If a child is returned, casework
supervision shall continue for a period of six months, at which time
there shall be a hearing on the need for continued intervention.
(b) If the child is not returned home, the court shall establish in
writing:
(i) ((Whether reasonable services have been provided to or offered
to the parties to facilitate reunion, specifying the services provided
or offered)) Whether the agency is making reasonable efforts to provide
services to the family and eliminate the need for placement of the
child. If additional services, including housing assistance, are
needed to facilitate the return of the child to the child's parents,
the court shall order that reasonable services be offered specifying
such services;
(ii) Whether there has been compliance with the case plan by the
child, the child's parents, and the agency supervising the placement;
(iii) Whether progress has been made toward correcting the problems
that necessitated the child's placement in out-of-home care;
(iv) Whether the services set forth in the case plan and the
responsibilities of the parties need to be clarified or modified due to
the availability of additional information or changed circumstances;
(v) Whether there is a continuing need for placement;
(vi) Whether the child is in an appropriate placement which
adequately meets all physical, emotional, and educational needs;
(((ii))) (vii) Whether ((the child has been placed in the least-restrictive setting appropriate to the child's needs, including whether
consideration and)) preference has been given to placement with the
child's relatives;
(((iii) Whether there is a continuing need for placement and
whether the placement is appropriate;)) (viii) Whether the parents have visited the child and any
reasons why visitation has not occurred or has been infrequent;
(iv) Whether there has been compliance with the case plan by the
child, the child's parents, and the agency supervising the placement;
(v) Whether progress has been made toward correcting the problems
that necessitated the child's placement in out-of-home care;
(vi)
(((vii) Whether additional services, including housing assistance,
are needed to facilitate the return of the child to the child's
parents; if so, the court shall order that reasonable services be
offered specifying such services; and)) (ix) Whether terms of visitation need to be modified;
(viii)
(x) Whether the court-approved long-term permanent plan for the
child remains the best plan for the child;
(xi) Whether any additional court orders need to be made to move
the case toward permanency; and
(xii) The projected date by which the child will be returned home
or other permanent plan of care will be implemented.
(c) The court at the review hearing may order that a petition
seeking termination of the parent and child relationship be filed.
(((2))) (3)(a) In any case in which the court orders that a
dependent child may be returned to or remain in the child's home, the
in-home placement shall be contingent upon the following:
(i) The compliance of the parents with court orders related to the
care and supervision of the child, including compliance with an agency
case plan; and
(ii) The continued participation of the parents, if applicable, in
available substance abuse or mental health treatment if substance abuse
or mental illness was a contributing factor to the removal of the
child.
(b) The following may be grounds for removal of the child from the
home, subject to review by the court:
(i) Noncompliance by the parents with the agency case plan or court
order;
(ii) The parent's inability, unwillingness, or failure to
participate in available services or treatment for themselves or the
child, including substance abuse treatment if a parent's substance
abuse was a contributing factor to the abuse or neglect; or
(iii) The failure of the parents to successfully and substantially
complete available services or treatment for themselves or the child,
including substance abuse treatment if a parent's substance abuse was
a contributing factor to the abuse or neglect.
(((3))) (4) The court's ability to order housing assistance under
RCW 13.34.130 and this section is: (a) Limited to cases in which
homelessness or the lack of adequate and safe housing is the primary
reason for an out-of-home placement; and (b) subject to the
availability of funds appropriated for this specific purpose.
(((4))) (5) The court shall consider the child's relationship with
siblings in accordance with RCW 13.34.130(3).
Sec. 7 RCW 13.34.145 and 2003 c 227 s 6 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) ((A permanency plan shall be developed no later than sixty days
from the time the supervising agency assumes responsibility for
providing services, including placing the child, or at the time of a
hearing under RCW 13.34.130, whichever occurs first. The permanency
planning process continues until a permanency planning goal is achieved
or dependency is dismissed. The planning process shall include
reasonable efforts to return the child to the parent's home.)) The purpose of a permanency planning hearing is to review the
permanency plan for the child, inquire into the welfare of the child
and progress of the case, and reach decisions regarding the permanent
placement of the child.
(a) Whenever a child is placed in out-of-home care pursuant to RCW
13.34.130, the agency that has custody of the child shall provide the
court with a written permanency plan of care directed towards securing
a safe, stable, and permanent home for the child as soon as possible.
The plan shall identify one of the following outcomes as the primary
goal and may also identify additional outcomes as alternative goals:
Return of the child to the home of the child's parent, guardian, or
legal custodian; adoption; guardianship; permanent legal custody; long-term relative or foster care, until the child is age eighteen, with a
written agreement between the parties and the care provider; a
responsible living skills program; and independent living, if
appropriate and if the child is age sixteen or older and the provisions
of subsection (2) of this section are met.
(b) The identified outcomes and goals of the permanency plan may
change over time based upon the circumstances of the particular case.
(c) Permanency planning goals should be achieved at the earliest
possible date, preferably before the child has been in out-of-home care
for fifteen months. In cases where parental rights have been
terminated, the child is legally free for adoption, and adoption has
been identified as the primary permanency planning goal, it shall be a
goal to complete the adoption within six months following entry of the
termination order.
(d) For purposes related to permanency planning:
(i) "Guardianship" means a dependency guardianship, a legal
guardianship pursuant to chapter 11.88 RCW, or equivalent laws of
another state or a federally recognized Indian tribe.
(ii) "Permanent custody order" means a custody order entered
pursuant to chapter 26.10 RCW.
(iii) "Permanent legal custody" means legal custody pursuant to
chapter 26.10 RCW or equivalent laws of another state or of a federally
recognized Indian tribe.
(2) Whenever a permanency plan identifies independent living as a
goal, the plan shall also specifically identify the services that will
be provided to assist the child to make a successful transition from
foster care to independent living. Before the court approves
independent living as a permanency plan of care, the court shall make
a finding that the provision of services to assist the child in making
a transition from foster care to independent living will allow the
child to manage his or her financial, personal, social, educational,
and nonfinancial affairs. The department shall not discharge a child
to an independent living situation before the child is eighteen years
of age unless the child becomes emancipated pursuant to chapter 13.64
RCW.
(3)
(a) A permanency planning hearing shall be held in all cases where
the child has remained in out-of-home care for at least nine months and
an adoption decree, guardianship order, or permanent custody order has
not previously been entered. The hearing shall take place no later
than twelve months following commencement of the current placement
episode.
(((4))) (b) Whenever a child is removed from the home of a
dependency guardian or long-term relative or foster care provider, and
the child is not returned to the home of the parent, guardian, or legal
custodian but is placed in out-of-home care, a permanency planning
hearing shall take place no later than twelve months, as provided in
((subsection (3) of)) this section, following the date of removal
unless, prior to the hearing, the child returns to the home of the
dependency guardian or long-term care provider, the child is placed in
the home of the parent, guardian, or legal custodian, an adoption
decree, guardianship order, or a permanent custody order is entered, or
the dependency is dismissed.
(((5))) (c) Permanency planning goals should be achieved at the
earliest possible date, preferably before the child has been in out-of-home care for fifteen months. In cases where parental rights have been
terminated, the child is legally free for adoption, and adoption has
been identified as the primary permanency planning goal, it shall be a
goal to complete the adoption within six months following entry of the
termination order.
(2) No later than ten working days prior to the permanency planning
hearing, the agency having custody of the child shall submit a written
permanency plan to the court and shall mail a copy of the plan to all
parties and their legal counsel, if any.
(((6))) (3) At the permanency planning hearing, the court shall
((enter findings as required by RCW 13.34.138 and shall review the
permanency plan prepared by the agency)) conduct the following inquiry:
(a) If a goal of long-term foster or relative care has been
achieved prior to the permanency planning hearing, the court shall
review the child's status to determine whether the placement and the
plan for the child's care remain appropriate.
(b) In cases where the primary permanency planning goal has not
been achieved, the court shall inquire regarding the reasons why the
primary goal has not been achieved and determine what needs to be done
to make it possible to achieve the primary goal. The court shall
review the permanency plan prepared by the agency and make explicit
findings regarding each of the following:
(i) The continuing necessity for, and the safety and
appropriateness of, the placement;
(ii) The extent of compliance with the permanency plan by the
agency and any other service providers, the child's parents, the child,
and the child's guardian, if any;
(iii) The extent of any efforts to involve appropriate service
providers in addition to agency staff in planning to meet the special
needs of the child and the child's parents;
(iv) The progress toward eliminating the causes for the child's
placement outside of his or her home and toward returning the child
safely to his or her home or obtaining a permanent placement for the
child;
(v) The date by which it is likely that the child will be returned
to his or her home or placed for adoption, with a guardian or in some
other alternative permanent placement; and
(vi) If the child has been placed outside of his or her home for
fifteen of the most recent twenty-two months, not including any period
during which the child was a runaway from the out-of-home placement or
the first six months of any period during which the child was returned
to his or her home for a trial home visit, the appropriateness of the
permanency plan, whether reasonable efforts were made by the agency to
achieve the goal of the permanency plan, and the circumstances which
prevent the child from any of the following:
(A) Being returned safely to his or her home;
(B) Having a petition for the involuntary termination of parental
rights filed on behalf of the child;
(C) Being placed for adoption;
(D) Being placed with a guardian;
(E) Being placed in the home of a fit and willing relative of the
child; or
(F) Being placed in some other alternative permanent placement,
including independent living or long-term foster care.
(c)(i) If the permanency plan identifies independent living as a
goal, the court shall make a finding that the provision of services to
assist the child in making a transition from foster care to independent
living will allow the child to manage his or her financial, personal,
social, educational, and nonfinancial affairs prior to approving
independent living as a permanency plan of care.
(ii) The permanency plan shall also specifically identify the
services that will be provided to assist the child to make a successful
transition from foster care to independent living.
(iii) The department shall not discharge a child to an independent
living situation before the child is eighteen years of age unless the
child becomes emancipated pursuant to chapter 13.64 RCW.
(d) If the child has resided in the home of a foster parent or
relative for more than six months prior to the permanency planning
hearing, the court shall also enter a finding regarding whether the
foster parent or relative was informed of the hearing as required in
RCW 74.13.280 and 13.34.138. ((If a goal of long-term foster or
relative care has been achieved prior to the permanency planning
hearing, the court shall review the child's status to determine whether
the placement and the plan for the child's care remain appropriate. In
cases where the primary permanency planning goal has not been achieved,
the court shall inquire regarding the reasons why the primary goal has
not been achieved and determine what needs to be done to make it
possible to achieve the primary goal.))
(4) In all cases, at the permanency planning hearing, the court
shall:
(a)(i) Order the permanency plan prepared by the agency to be
implemented; or
(ii) Modify the permanency plan, and order implementation of the
modified plan; and
(b)(i) Order the child returned home only if the court finds that
a reason for removal as set forth in RCW 13.34.130 no longer exists; or
(ii) Order the child to remain in out-of-home care for a limited
specified time period while efforts are made to implement the
permanency plan.
(((7))) (5) Following the first permanency planning hearing, the
court shall hold a further permanency planning hearing in accordance
with this section at least once every twelve months until a permanency
planning goal is achieved or the dependency is dismissed, whichever
occurs first.
(6) Prior to the second permanency planning hearing, the agency
that has custody of the child shall consider whether to file a petition
for termination of parental rights.
(7) If a child is removed from home due to allegations of abuse or
neglect, returned home, and subsequently removed and placed in
out-of-home care, the court shall hold a permanency hearing no later
than thirty days from the date of the removal to determine the
appropriate action, including a change in the permanency plan or the
filing of a termination petition. The best interests of the child
shall be the primary consideration in determining the appropriate
action.
(8) If the court orders the child returned home, casework
supervision shall continue for at least six months, at which time a
review hearing shall be held pursuant to RCW 13.34.138, and the court
shall determine the need for continued intervention.
(((8))) (9) The juvenile court may hear a petition for permanent
legal custody when: (a) The court has ordered implementation of a
permanency plan that includes permanent legal custody; and (b) the
party pursuing the permanent legal custody is the party identified in
the permanency plan as the prospective legal custodian. During the
pendency of such proceeding, the court shall conduct review hearings
and further permanency planning hearings as provided in this chapter.
At the conclusion of the legal guardianship or permanent legal custody
proceeding, a juvenile court hearing shall be held for the purpose of
determining whether dependency should be dismissed. If a guardianship
or permanent custody order has been entered, the dependency shall be
dismissed.
(((9))) (10) Continued juvenile court jurisdiction under this
chapter shall not be a barrier to the entry of an order establishing a
legal guardianship or permanent legal custody when the requirements of
subsection (((8))) (9) of this section are met.
(((10) Following the first permanency planning hearing, the court
shall hold a further permanency planning hearing in accordance with
this section at least once every twelve months until a permanency
planning goal is achieved or the dependency is dismissed, whichever
occurs first.)) (11) Nothing in this chapter may be construed to limit the
ability of the agency that has custody of the child to file a petition
for termination of parental rights or a guardianship petition at any
time following the establishment of dependency. Upon the filing of
such a petition, a fact-finding hearing shall be scheduled and held in
accordance with this chapter unless the agency requests dismissal of
the petition prior to the hearing or unless the parties enter an agreed
order terminating parental rights, establishing guardianship, or
otherwise resolving the matter.
(11) Except as provided in RCW 13.34.235, the status of all
dependent children shall continue to be reviewed by the court at least
once every six months, in accordance with RCW 13.34.138, until the
dependency is dismissed. Prior to the second permanency planning
hearing, the agency that has custody of the child shall consider
whether to file a petition for termination of parental rights.
(12)
(((13))) (12) The approval of a permanency plan that does not
contemplate return of the child to the parent does not relieve the
supervising agency of its obligation to provide reasonable services,
under this chapter, intended to effectuate the return of the child to
the parent, including but not limited to, visitation rights. The court
shall consider the child's relationships with siblings in accordance
with RCW 13.34.130.
(((14))) (13) Nothing in this chapter may be construed to limit the
procedural due process rights of any party in a termination or
guardianship proceeding filed under this chapter.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 8 If any provision of this act or its
application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the
remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other
persons or circumstances is not affected.