BILL REQ. #:  H-2784.1 

READ FIRST TIME 03/05/07.   

     AN ACT Relating to shellfish; amending RCW 79.135.100; adding new sections to chapter 28B.20 RCW; and creating new sections.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1   A new section is added to chapter 28B.20 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) The sea grant program at the University of Washington shall, consistent with this section, commission a series of scientific research studies that examines the possible effects, including the cumulative effects, of the current prevalent geoduck aquaculture techniques and practices on the natural environment in and around Puget Sound, including the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The sea grant program shall use funding provided from the geoduck aquaculture research account created in section 2 of this act to review existing literature, directly perform research identified as needed, or to enter into and manage contracts with scientific organizations or institutions to accomplish these results.
     (2) Prior to entering into a contract with a scientific organization or institution, the sea grant program must:
     (a) Analyze, through peer review, the credibility of the proposed party to the contract, including whether the party has credible experience and knowledge and has access to the facilities necessary to fully execute the research required by the contract; and
     (b) Require that all proposed parties to a contract fully disclose any past, present, or planned future personal or professional connections with the shellfish industry or public interest groups.
     (3) All research commissioned under this section must be subjected to a rigorous peer review process prior to being accepted and reported by the sea grant program.
     (4) In prioritizing and directing research under this section, the sea grant program shall meet with the department of ecology at least annually and rely on guidance submitted by the department of ecology. The department of ecology shall convene the shellfish aquaculture regulatory committee created in section 4 of this act as necessary to serve as an oversight committee to formulate the guidance provided to the sea grant program. The objective of the oversight committee, and the resulting guidance provided to the sea grant program, is to ensure that the research required under this section satisfies the planning, permitting, and data management needs of the state, to assist in the prioritization of research given limited funding, and to help identify any research that is beneficial to complete other than what is listed in subsection (5) of this section.
     (5) To satisfy the minimum requirements of subsection (1) of this section, the sea grant program shall review all scientific research that is existing or in progress that examines the possible effect of currently prevalent shellfish practices, including geoduck practices, on the natural environment, and prioritize and conduct new studies as needed, to measure and assess the following:
     (a) The environmental effects of structures commonly used in the aquaculture industry to protect juvenile geoducks from predation;
     (b) The environmental effects of commercial harvesting of geoducks from intertidal geoduck beds, focusing on current prevalent harvesting techniques, including a review of the recovery rates for benthic communities after harvest;
     (c) The extent to which geoducks in standard aquaculture tracts alter the ecological characteristics of overlying waters while the tracts are submerged, including impacts on species diversity, and the abundance of other benthic organisms;
     (d) Baseline information regarding naturally existing parasites and diseases in wild and cultured geoducks, including whether and to what extent commercial intertidal geoduck aquaculture practices impact the baseline;
     (e) Genetic interactions between cultured and wild geoduck, including measurements of differences between cultured geoducks and wild geoducks in terms of genetics and reproductive status; and
     (f) The impact of the use of sterile triploid geoducks and whether triploid animals diminish the genetic interactions between wild and cultured geoducks.
     (6) If adequate funding is not made available for the completion of all research required under this section, the sea grant program shall consult with the shellfish aquaculture regulatory committee, via the department of ecology, to prioritize which of the enumerated research projects have the greatest cost/benefit ratio in terms of providing information important for regulatory decisions; however, the study identified in subsection (5)(b) of this section shall receive top priority unless the sea grant program determines that an adequate study addressing the issues identified in subsection (5)(b) of this section has already been completed or is within six months of completion. The prioritization process may include the addition of any new studies that may be appropriate in addition to, or in place of, studies listed in this section.
     (7) When appropriate, all research commissioned under this section must address localized and cumulative effects of geoduck aquaculture.
     (8) The sea grant program and the University of Washington are prohibited from retaining greater than fifteen percent of any funding provided to implement this section for administrative overhead or other deductions not directly associated with conducting the research required by this section.
     (9) Individual commissioned contracts under this section may address single or multiple components listed for study under this section.
     (10) All research commissioned under this section must be completed and the results reported to the appropriate committees of the legislature by December 1, 2013. In addition, the sea grant program shall provide the appropriate committees of the legislature with annual reports updating the status and progress of the ongoing studies that are completed in advance of the 2013 deadline.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2   A new section is added to chapter 28B.20 RCW to read as follows:
     The geoduck aquaculture research account is created in the custody of the state treasurer. All receipts from any legislative appropriations directed to the account must be deposited in the account. Expenditures from the account may only be used by the sea grant program for the geoduck research projects identified by section 1 of this act. Only the president of the University of Washington or the president's designee may authorize expenditures from the account. The account is subject to the allotment procedures under chapter 43.88 RCW, but an appropriation is not required for expenditures.

Sec. 3   RCW 79.135.100 and 1984 c 221 s 10 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) If state-owned aquatic lands are used for aquaculture production or harvesting, rents and fees shall be established through competitive bidding or negotiation.
     (2) The department is prohibited from offering leases that would permit the intertidal commercial aquaculture of geoducks on more than twenty-five acres of state-owned aquatic lands a year until December 1, 2014. Any intertidal leases entered into by the department for geoduck aquaculture must be conditioned in such a way that the department can engage in monitoring of the environmental impacts of the lease's execution, without unreasonably diminishing the economic viability of the lease, and that the lease tracts are eligible to be made part of the studies conducted under section 1 of this act.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4   (1) The shellfish aquaculture regulatory committee is established to, consistent with this section, serve as an advisory body to the department of ecology on regulatory processes and approvals for all current and new shellfish aquaculture activities, and the activities conducted pursuant to RCW 90.58.060, as the activities relate to shellfish. The shellfish aquaculture regulatory committee is advisory in nature, and no vote or action of the committee may overrule existing statutes, regulations, or local ordinances.
     (2) The shellfish aquaculture regulatory committee shall develop recommendations as to:
     (a) A regulatory system or permit process for all current and new shellfish aquaculture projects and activities that integrates all applicable existing local, state, and federal regulations and is efficient both for the regulators and the regulated; and
     (b) Appropriate guidelines for geoduck aquaculture operations to be included in shoreline master programs under section 5 of this act.
     (3)(a) The members of the shellfish aquaculture regulatory committee shall be appointed by the director of the department of ecology as follows:
     (i) Two representatives of county government, one from a county located on the Puget Sound, and one from a county located on the Pacific Ocean;
     (ii) Two individuals who are professionally engaged in the commercial aquaculture of shellfish, one who owns or operates an aquatic farm in Puget Sound, and one who owns or operates an aquatic farm in state waters other than the Puget Sound;
     (iii) Two representatives of organizations representing the environmental community;
     (iv) Two individuals who own shoreline property, one of which does not have a commercial geoduck operation on his or her property and one of which who does have a commercial geoduck operation on his or her property; and
     (v) One representative each from the following state agencies: The department of ecology, the department of fish and wildlife, the department of agriculture, and the department of natural resources.
     (b) In addition to the other participants listed in this subsection, the governor shall invite the full participation of two tribal governments, at least one of which is located within the drainage of the Puget Sound.
     (4) The department of ecology shall provide administrative and clerical assistance to the shellfish aquaculture regulatory committee and all agencies listed in subsection (3) of this section shall provide technical assistance.
     (5) Nonagency members of the shellfish aquaculture regulatory committee will not be compensated, but are entitled to be reimbursed for travel expenses in accordance with RCW 43.03.050 and 43.03.060.
     (6) Any participation by a Native American tribe on the shellfish aquaculture regulatory committee shall not, under any circumstances, be viewed as an admission by the tribe that any of its activities, or those of its members, are subject to any of the statutes, regulations, ordinances, standards, or permit systems reviewed, considered, or proposed by the committee.
     (7) The shellfish aquaculture regulatory committee is authorized to form technical advisory panels as needed and appoint to them members not on the shellfish aquaculture regulatory committee.
     (8) The department of ecology shall report the recommendations and findings of the shellfish aquaculture regulatory committee to the appropriate committees of the legislature by December 1, 2007, with a further report, if necessary, by December 1, 2008.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 5   (1) The department of ecology shall develop, by rule, guidelines for the appropriate siting and operation of geoduck aquaculture operations to be included in any master program under this section. The guidelines adopted under this section must be prepared with the advice of the shellfish aquaculture regulatory committee created in section 4 of this act, which shall serve as the advisory committee for the development of the guidelines.
     (2) The guidelines required under this section must be filed for public review and comment no later than six months after the delivery of the final report by the shellfish aquaculture regulatory committee created in section 4 of this act.
     (3) The department of ecology shall update the guidelines required under this section, as necessary, after the completion of the geoduck research by the sea grant program at the University of Washington required under section 1 of this act.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 6   If specific funding for the purposes of this act, referencing this act by bill or chapter number, is not provided by June 30, 2007, in the omnibus appropriations act, this act is null and void.