BILL REQ. #: S-0641.1
State of Washington | 60th Legislature | 2007 Regular Session |
Read first time 01/17/2007. Referred to Committee on Agriculture & Rural Economic Development.
AN ACT Relating to a conservation futures levy; and amending RCW 84.34.230.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec. 1 RCW 84.34.230 and 2005 c 449 s 1 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) Conservation futures are a useful tool for counties to preserve
lands of public interest for future generations. Counties are
encouraged to use some conservation futures as one tool for salmon
preservation purposes.
(2) For the purpose of acquiring conservation futures and other
rights and interests in real property pursuant to RCW 84.34.210 and
84.34.220, and for maintaining and operating any property acquired with
these funds, a county may levy an amount not to exceed ((six and one-quarter)) twelve and one-half cents per thousand dollars of assessed
valuation against the assessed valuation of all taxable property within
the county. The limitations in RCW 84.52.043 shall not apply to the
tax levy authorized in this section.
(3)(a) Of the amount levied by a county under subsection (2) of
this section that is in excess of six and one-quarter cents per
thousand dollars, at least one-half shall be used to acquire
conservation easements on farm and agricultural land or purchase the
development rights to farm and agricultural land. Such acquisition of
a conservation easement or purchase of development right shall be made
in a way to retain the long-term farm and agricultural use of the land.
(b) An amount levied by a county under subsection (2) of this
section that is in excess of six and one-quarter cents per thousand
dollars and that is not used under (a) of this subsection, may be used
in accordance with RCW 84.34.210 and 84.34.220.
(4) Any rights or interests in real property acquired under this
section after July 24, 2005, must be located within the assessing
county. Further, the county must determine if the rights or interests
in real property acquired with these funds would reduce the capacity of
land suitable for development necessary to accommodate the allocated
housing and employment growth, as adopted in the countywide planning
policies. When actions are taken that reduce capacity to accommodate
planned growth, the jurisdiction shall adopt reasonable measures to
increase the capacity lost by such actions.