BILL REQ. #: S-0019.1
State of Washington | 60th Legislature | 2007 Regular Session |
Read first time 02/02/2007. Referred to Committee on Judiciary.
AN ACT Relating to a claim filed against a design professional; and adding a new section to chapter 4.24 RCW.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 A new section is added to chapter 4.24 RCW
to read as follows:
(1) As used in this section, "design professional" means: (a) An
architect, professional engineer, land surveyor, landscape architect,
or geologist who is licensed or authorized by law to practice such
profession; (b) any corporation organized under chapter 18.100 RCW or
authorized under RCW 18.08.420 or 18.43.130 to render design services;
(c) an employee or subconsultant of a person described in (a) or (b) of
this subsection, acting in the course and scope of his or her
employment; or (d) an entity, whether or not incorporated, employing
one or more persons described in (a) or (b) of this subsection.
(2) If a claim is filed in any forum against a design professional
in which loss is alleged to have been caused by an act or omission that
violates the standard of care, a claimant must file a certificate of
merit at the time of filing the claim. If the claim is filed within
forty-five days prior to the expiration of the applicable statute of
limitations, the claimant must file the certificate of merit no later
than forty-five days after filing the claim.
(3) The certificate of merit must be executed by a design
professional who holds a license, certificate, or registration issued
by this state or another state and who currently practices in the same
specialty or subspecialty as that of the design professional against
whom the claim is filed. If there is more than one design professional
named in the action, the claimant must file a certificate of merit for
each named design professional.
(4) The certificate of merit must contain a statement that the
person executing the certificate of merit believes, based on the
information known at the time of executing the certificate of merit,
that there is a reasonable probability that the design professional's
conduct did not follow the accepted standard of care required to be
exercised by that design professional and that the conduct was a cause
of the claimed loss.
(5) Upon motion of the claimant, the court may grant an additional
period of time to file the certificate of merit, not to exceed ninety
days, if the court finds there is good cause for the extension.
Notwithstanding any requirement of any civil procedural or arbitration
rule to the contrary, the design professional against whom a claim is
asserted is not required to file an answer to any claim until twenty
days after the claimant has filed the certificate of merit.
(6)(a) Failure to file a certificate of merit that complies with
the requirements of this section is grounds for dismissal of the claim.
(b) If a claim is dismissed for failure to file a certificate of
merit that complies with the requirements of this section, the filing
of the claim against the design professional shall not be used against
the design professional in professional liability insurance rate
setting, personal credit history, or professional licensing or
credentialing.