Washington State

House of Representatives

Office of Program Research

BILL

ANALYSIS

Judiciary Committee

HB 2414

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Title: An act relating to abatement of nuisances involving criminal street gang activity.

Brief Description: Authorizing abatement of nuisances involving criminal street gang activity.

Sponsors: Representatives Johnson, O'Brien, Ross, Finn, Haler, Klippert, Taylor, Crouse, Angel, Ericksen, Roach, Kristiansen, Hinkle, Chandler, Seaquist, Walsh, Warnick, Rodne, Smith, Nealey, Short, Hope, Ericks, Liias, Campbell, Morrell, Kelley, Maxwell, Sullivan, Conway, Bailey, Schmick and Hurst.

Brief Summary of Bill

  • Creates a criminal street gang activity nuisance law.

Hearing Date: 1/14/10

Staff: Courtney Barnes (786-7194).

Background:

A variety of public and private nuisance actions are available to stop activity that is illegal, dangerous, or disruptive to neighboring property owners and the general public. Nuisance laws cover such activities as prostitution, exhibition of lewd films, and fighting. Although nuisance laws have traditionally developed through common law, the Legislature has enacted specific statutes to deal with certain kinds of nuisances.

 

For instance, the Legislature enacted a drug nuisance law allowing for private or public prosecution of an abatement action against a drug-related nuisance. Any building or unit within a building that is used for the purpose of unlawfully manufacturing, delivering, selling, storing, or giving away illegal drugs, and any building or unit where such acts take place, is a nuisance. A person may bring an action to abate the nuisance by filing a complaint in superior court.

 

If the existence of the nuisance is established in the action, the court may order an abatement of the nuisance which shall, among other things: (a) direct the removal of all personal property subject to seizure and forfeiture under the drug forfeiture laws, and (b) provide for the immediate closure of the building or unit against its use for any purpose for a period of one year, unless released sooner. A defendant can avoid an abatement order by satisfying certain criteria.

Summary of Bill:

A criminal street gang activity nuisance law is created with provisions similar to those found in the drug nuisance law. A building or unit within a building that is used for the purpose of aiding, promoting, or conducting criminal street gang activity, and a building or unit where such acts take place, is a nuisance. In a multi-unit building, only the offending unit shall be declared a nuisance.

"Criminal street gang activity" means a pattern of criminal gang activity, which is defined in the Sentencing Reform Act.

Complaint and Affidavit

Any person with legal standing and who resides, works in, or owns property in the same multi-family building, apartment complex, or within a one-block radius may bring a nuisance action by filing a complaint with a law enforcement agency in the county where the property is located. A public agency may also commence an action.

Law enforcement must investigate the allegations in the complaint. If there is probable cause that a violation of the act is occurring, the complaint must be filed in the county superior court. After receiving the complaint, the court shall grant a hearing within five business days or seven calendar days.

The complaint must be verified or accompanied by an affidavit that describes the adverse impact associated with the property on the surrounding neighborhood. "Adverse impact" includes, but is not limited to:

The complaint and affidavit must be served on the property owner, if different from the current occupant, at least three business days before the hearing. There are various provisions regarding service of the complaint. For purposes of showing that the owner has had an opportunity to abate the nuisance, the affidavit shall contain a description of all attempts to notify and locate the owner, including at least one attempt to notify the owner by registered mail.

Order of Abatement

If existence of the nuisance is established in the action, an order of abatement must be entered. The order of abatement shall: (a) direct the removal and forfeiture of all personal property from the building or unit if the property is subject to seizure and forfeiture under the drug forfeiture statutes; and (b) if the building or unit is not subject to the interests of innocent legal owners, provide for the immediate closure of the building or unit against its use for any purpose for a period of one year unless released sooner. While the abatement order is in effect, the building or unit remains in the custody of the court.

If the court finds and concludes that the owner of the building or unit: (a) had no knowledge of the existence of the nuisance or has been making reasonable efforts to abate the nuisance; (b) has not been guilty of any contempt of court in the proceedings; and (c) will immediately abate any such nuisance at the building or unit and prevent it from being a nuisance within a period of one year thereafter, then the court shall, if satisfied of the owner's good faith, order the building or unit to be delivered to the owner and no abatement order shall be entered. If an order of abatement has been entered and the owner subsequently meets these requirements, the order of abatement shall be canceled.

Distribution of Proceeds

The bill contains specific provisions for how proceeds from any property forfeiture shall be distributed. Generally, the proceeds shall be applied in the following order:

1. to satisfy the fees and costs of the removal and sale;

2. to the allowances and costs of closing and keeping the building or unit closed;

3. to the payment of the plaintiff's costs; and

4. the balance, if any, to the owner of the property.

If the proceeds do not fully satisfy the costs, fees, and allowances, the building or unit may be sold, provided that the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the owner of the building or unit had actual or constructive knowledge or notice of the existence of the nuisance.

Restraining Orders or Injunctions

Provisions are created regarding temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions. The court may issue an ex parte restraining order or preliminary injunction to prevent the defendant and all other persons, other than the legal owner, from removing personal property and contents of the place where the nuisance is alleged to exist. An intentional violation of a restraining order, preliminary injunction, or abatement order is punishable as contempt of court.

A temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction may not be issued unless the person requesting it posts a bond or security of at least $1,000. A bond or security is not required of the state, municipal corporations, or political subdivisions of the state.

An officer serving an order or injunction must make an inventory of the personal property and contents situated in and used in conducting or maintaining the nuisance. This inventory must be returned to the court.

Precedence Over Other Actions

A criminal street gang activity nuisance action takes precedence over all other actions except prior matters of the same character, actions under the drug nuisance laws, criminal proceedings, election contests, hearings on temporary restraining orders and injunctions, foreclosures by a legal owner, and actions to forfeit vehicles used in violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Requested on 1/11/10.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.