BILL REQ. #:  S-4064.1 



_____________________________________________ 

SENATE BILL 6666
_____________________________________________
State of Washington61st Legislature2010 Regular Session

By Senators Pflug and McCaslin

Read first time 01/20/10.   Referred to Committee on Judiciary.



     AN ACT Relating to statutory construction; adding a new section to chapter 2.08 RCW; and creating a new section.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1   The legislature believes the role of policymaking requires clarity, consistency, and precision in the preparation and interpretation of legislation. The legislature finds that over the past decades, there have been instances in which statutes have been judicially construed differently than may have been intended and that it will be helpful to the judicial and legislative branches if the rules by which statutes are judicially construed are reviewed and better understood by both branches. The legislature also finds that rules of construction should be codified to the extent possible such that both branches will have enhanced opportunities to: (1) Achieve mutually consistent understandings of legislative intent regarding matters of public policy; (2) reduce the necessity of ongoing revisions; and (3) provide parties to litigation increased predictability of outcome of contested matters.
     The legislature finds that the ad hoc statutory construction work group convened by the chair of the senate judiciary committee reviews the existing rules of statutory construction, identifies those rules that are appropriate for codification, and identifies those rules that may, if revised, lead to improved comity between the legislative and judicial branches in determining public policy. It is anticipated that the work group will ultimately form the basis of a more complete hierarchy of legislative history to be considered in determining legislative intent. The legislature recognizes that courts may be directed to a multiplicity of sources when seeking to determine the legislative intent of enacted law. The legislature further finds that some sources are better reflections of legislative intent than others. Therefore, the legislature intends to provide clear guidance as an aid to officers of the court and the public, as they attempt to discern legislative intent.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2   A new section is added to chapter 2.08 RCW to read as follows:
     Where available, parties discerning legislative intent shall consider the introductory comments of the prime sponsor of the legislation as a guide to understanding both the issue to which the legislature was responding and the context in which the law was enacted. The following represents a nonexclusive hierarchy of factors to be used when discerning legislative intent:
     (1) The floor colloquy(s) on final passage, if any;
     (2) The content of amendments to the legislation adopted on the floor of a chamber of the legislature;
     (3) The content of amendments to the legislation adopted in a committee of the legislature; and
     (4) The intent section of an act, if present.
     An officer of the court shall not discern legislative intent from staff materials prepared to assist legislators in their deliberative process, including bill reports.

--- END ---