BILL REQ. #: S-4064.1
State of Washington | 61st Legislature | 2010 Regular Session |
Read first time 01/20/10. Referred to Committee on Judiciary.
AN ACT Relating to statutory construction; adding a new section to chapter 2.08 RCW; and creating a new section.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 The legislature believes the role of
policymaking requires clarity, consistency, and precision in the
preparation and interpretation of legislation. The legislature finds
that over the past decades, there have been instances in which statutes
have been judicially construed differently than may have been intended
and that it will be helpful to the judicial and legislative branches if
the rules by which statutes are judicially construed are reviewed and
better understood by both branches. The legislature also finds that
rules of construction should be codified to the extent possible such
that both branches will have enhanced opportunities to: (1) Achieve
mutually consistent understandings of legislative intent regarding
matters of public policy; (2) reduce the necessity of ongoing
revisions; and (3) provide parties to litigation increased
predictability of outcome of contested matters.
The legislature finds that the ad hoc statutory construction work
group convened by the chair of the senate judiciary committee reviews
the existing rules of statutory construction, identifies those rules
that are appropriate for codification, and identifies those rules that
may, if revised, lead to improved comity between the legislative and
judicial branches in determining public policy. It is anticipated that
the work group will ultimately form the basis of a more complete
hierarchy of legislative history to be considered in determining
legislative intent. The legislature recognizes that courts may be
directed to a multiplicity of sources when seeking to determine the
legislative intent of enacted law. The legislature further finds that
some sources are better reflections of legislative intent than others.
Therefore, the legislature intends to provide clear guidance as an aid
to officers of the court and the public, as they attempt to discern
legislative intent.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 2 A new section is added to chapter 2.08 RCW
to read as follows:
Where available, parties discerning legislative intent shall
consider the introductory comments of the prime sponsor of the
legislation as a guide to understanding both the issue to which the
legislature was responding and the context in which the law was
enacted. The following represents a nonexclusive hierarchy of factors
to be used when discerning legislative intent:
(1) The floor colloquy(s) on final passage, if any;
(2) The content of amendments to the legislation adopted on the
floor of a chamber of the legislature;
(3) The content of amendments to the legislation adopted in a
committee of the legislature; and
(4) The intent section of an act, if present.
An officer of the court shall not discern legislative intent from
staff materials prepared to assist legislators in their deliberative
process, including bill reports.