BILL REQ. #: S-4543.1
State of Washington | 61st Legislature | 2010 Regular Session |
Read first time 02/04/10. Referred to Committee on Ways & Means.
AN ACT Relating to information technology projects; amending RCW 43.88.560, 43.105.041, 43.105.180, and 43.105.190; and adding a new section to chapter 43.88 RCW.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 A new section is added to chapter 43.88 RCW
to read as follows:
(1) The office of financial management's operating budget
instructions to agencies must include collecting additional information
for proposed information technology projects. Agencies must submit the
following information about specific projects:
(a) Estimated project implementation costs by staffing, contracted
services, hardware purchase and maintenance, software license purchase
and maintenance, hardware lease or finance, maintenance and operations,
training, and travel;
(b) Estimated project maintenance costs by staffing, contracted
services, hardware purchase and maintenance, software license purchase
and maintenance, hardware lease or finance, maintenance and operations,
training, and travel;
(c) All project expenditures in previous biennia;
(d) Oversight level as determined by the information services
board, if available;
(e) Estimated project duration and start date;
(f) Estimated ongoing operating savings or other benefits resulting
from the project;
(g) An explanation of the purpose and benefits of the project; and
(h) An explanation of reengineering and streamlining of the
underlying business process, if pursuing the development or purchase of
new software. An explanation of efforts to gather business and
technical requirements must also be provided.
(2) The governor's budget must include an information technology
plan which will include a list of all the proposed projects, their next
biennium costs by funding source, projected costs over the two biennia
succeeding the next biennium by funding source, and a statement of the
purpose of the project.
(3) The office of financial management shall also institute a
method of accounting for information technology-related expenditures,
including creating common definitions for what constitutes an
information technology investment. The director of financial
management shall report total state expenditures on information
technology by funding source and by object of expenditure to the
chairs, ranking minority members, and staff coordinators of the
appropriations committees of the senate and house of representatives
for each biennium. The first report is due by January 15, 2013.
Sec. 2 RCW 43.88.560 and 1992 c 20 s 7 are each amended to read
as follows:
The director of financial management shall establish policies and
standards governing the funding of major information technology
projects as required under RCW 43.105.190(2). The director of
financial management shall also direct the collection of additional
information on information technology projects and submit an
information technology plan as required under section 1 of this act.
Sec. 3 RCW 43.105.041 and 2009 c 486 s 13 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) The board shall have the following powers and duties related to
information services:
(a) To develop standards and procedures governing the acquisition
and disposition of equipment, proprietary software and purchased
services, licensing of the radio spectrum by or on behalf of state
agencies, and confidentiality of computerized data. The board shall
coordinate with the office of financial management to develop
contracting standards for information technology acquisition and
purchased services and will work with state agencies to ensure
deployment of standardized contracts;
(b) To purchase, lease, rent, or otherwise acquire, dispose of, and
maintain equipment, proprietary software, and purchased services, or to
delegate to other agencies and institutions of state government, under
appropriate standards, the authority to purchase, lease, rent, or
otherwise acquire, dispose of, and maintain equipment, proprietary
software, and purchased services: PROVIDED, That, agencies and
institutions of state government are expressly prohibited from
acquiring or disposing of equipment, proprietary software, and
purchased services without such delegation of authority. The
acquisition and disposition of equipment, proprietary software, and
purchased services is exempt from RCW 43.19.1919 and, as provided in
RCW 43.19.1901, from the provisions of RCW 43.19.190 through 43.19.200,
except that the board, the department, and state agencies, as
delegated, must post notices of technology procurement bids on the
state's common vendor registration and bid notification system. This
subsection (1)(b) does not apply to the legislative branch;
(c) To develop statewide or interagency technical policies,
standards, and procedures;
(d) To review and approve standards and common specifications for
new or expanded telecommunications networks proposed by agencies,
public postsecondary education institutions, educational service
districts, or statewide or regional providers of K-12 information
technology services, and to assure the cost-effective development and
incremental implementation of a statewide video telecommunications
system to serve: Public schools; educational service districts;
vocational-technical institutes; community colleges; colleges and
universities; state and local government; and the general public
through public affairs programming;
(e) To provide direction concerning strategic planning goals and
objectives for the state. The board shall seek input from the
legislature and the judiciary;
(f) To develop and implement a process for the resolution of
appeals by:
(i) Vendors concerning the conduct of an acquisition process by an
agency or the department; or
(ii) A customer agency concerning the provision of services by the
department or by other state agency providers;
(g) To establish policies for the periodic review by the department
of agency performance which may include but are not limited to analysis
of:
(i) Planning, management, control, and use of information services;
(ii) Training and education; and
(iii) Project management;
(h) To set its meeting schedules and convene at scheduled times, or
meet at the request of a majority of its members, the chair, or the
director;
(i) To review and approve that portion of the department's budget
requests that provides for support to the board; and
(j) To develop procurement policies and procedures, such as
unbundled contracting and subcontracting, that encourage and facilitate
the purchase of products and services by state agencies and
institutions from Washington small businesses to the maximum extent
practicable and consistent with international trade agreement
commitments.
(2) Statewide technical standards to promote and facilitate
electronic information sharing and access are an essential component of
acceptable and reliable public access service and complement content-related standards designed to meet those goals. The board shall:
(a) Establish technical standards to facilitate electronic access
to government information and interoperability of information systems,
including wireless communications systems. Local governments are
strongly encouraged to follow the standards established by the board;
and
(b) Require agencies to consider electronic public access needs
when planning new information systems or major upgrades of systems.
In developing these standards, the board is encouraged to include
the state library, state archives, and appropriate representatives of
state and local government.
(3)(a) The board, in consultation with the K-20 board, has the duty
to govern, operate, and oversee the technical design, implementation,
and operation of the K-20 network including, but not limited to, the
following duties: Establishment and implementation of K-20 network
technical policy, including technical standards and conditions of use;
review and approval of network design; procurement of shared network
services and equipment; and resolving user/provider disputes concerning
technical matters. The board shall delegate general operational and
technical oversight to the K-20 network technical steering committee as
appropriate.
(b) The board has the authority to adopt rules under chapter 34.05
RCW to implement the provisions regarding the technical operations and
conditions of use of the K-20 network.
Sec. 4 RCW 43.105.180 and 1999 c 80 s 11 are each amended to read
as follows:
((Upon request of the office of financial management,)) The
department, in coordination with the information services board and the
office of financial management, shall evaluate agency budget requests
for major information technology projects identified under RCW
43.105.190, including those proposed by the superintendent of public
instruction, in conjunction with educational service districts, or
statewide or regional providers of K-12 education information
technology services. The department shall submit recommendations for
funding all or part of such requests to the office of financial
management and to the chairs, ranking minority members, and staff
coordinators of the appropriations committees of the senate and house
of representatives. The department shall also submit recommendations
regarding consolidation of similar proposals or other efficiencies it
finds in reviewing proposals.
The department, with the advice and approval of the office of
financial management and the information services board, shall
establish criteria, consistent with portfolio-based information
technology management, for the evaluation of agency budget requests
under this section. These budget requests shall be made in the context
of an agency's information technology portfolio; technology initiatives
underlying budget requests are subject to board review. Criteria shall
include, but not be limited to: Feasibility of the proposed projects,
consistency with the state strategic information technology plan,
consistency with information technology portfolios, appropriate
provision for public electronic access to information, evidence of
business process streamlining and gathering of business and technical
requirements, and services, costs, and benefits.
Sec. 5 RCW 43.105.190 and 2005 c 319 s 111 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) The department, with the approval of the board, shall establish
standards and policies governing the planning, implementation, and
evaluation of major information technology projects, including those
proposed by the superintendent of public instruction, in conjunction
with educational service districts, or statewide or regional providers
of K-12 education information technology services. The standards and
policies shall:
(a) Establish criteria to identify projects which are subject to
this section. Such criteria shall include, but not be limited to,
significant anticipated cost, complexity, or statewide significance of
the project; and
(b) Establish a model process and procedures which agencies shall
follow in developing and implementing projects within their information
technology portfolios. Agencies may propose, for approval by the
department, a process and procedures unique to the agency. The
department may accept or require modification of such agency proposals
or the department may reject such agency proposals and require use of
the model process and procedures established under this subsection.
Any process and procedures developed under this subsection shall
require (i) distinct and identifiable phases upon which funding may be
based, (ii) user validation of products through system demonstrations
and testing of prototypes and deliverables, and (iii) other elements
identified by the board.
The director may terminate a major project if the director
determines that the project is not meeting or is not expected to meet
anticipated performance standards.
(2) The office of financial management shall establish policies and
standards consistent with portfolio-based information technology
management to govern the funding of projects developed under this
section. The policies and standards shall provide for:
(a) Funding of a project under terms and conditions mutually agreed
to by the director, the director of financial management, and the head
of the agency proposing the project. However, the office of financial
management may require incremental funding of a project on a phase-by-phase basis whereby funds for a given phase of a project may be
released only when the office of financial management determines, with
the advice of the department, that the previous phase is satisfactorily
completed;
(b) Acceptance testing of products to assure that products perform
satisfactorily before they are accepted and final payment is made; and
(c) Other elements deemed necessary by the office of financial
management.
(3) The department shall evaluate projects based on the
demonstrated business needs and benefits; cost; technology scope and
feasibility; impact on the agency's information technology portfolio
and on the statewide infrastructure; and final project implementation
plan based upon available funding.
Copies of project evaluations conducted under this subsection shall
be submitted to the office of financial management and the chairs,
ranking minority members, and staff coordinators of the appropriations
committees of the senate and house of representatives.
If there are projects that receive funding from a transportation
fund or account, copies of those projects' evaluations conducted under
this subsection must be submitted to the chairs and ranking minority
members of the transportation committees of the senate and the house of
representatives.
(4) The department shall submit a major projects report to the
office of financial management and the chairs, ranking minority
members, and staff coordinators of the appropriations committees of the
senate and house of representatives. The report must contain the
following information for major information technology projects, as
identified in this section:
(a) Final budget broken down by staffing costs, contracted service,
hardware purchase or lease, software purchase or lease, travel, and
training. The original budget must also be shown for comparison.
(b) The original proposed project schedule and the final actual
project schedule.
(c) Data regarding progress towards meeting the original goals and
performance measures of the project, particularly as it relates to
operating budget savings.
(d) Discussion of lessons learned on the project, performance of
any contractors used, and reasons for project delays or cost increases.
The report must examine major information technology projects
completed in the previous biennium. The report must also examine
projects two years after completion for progress toward meeting
performance goals and operating budget savings. The first report is
due December 15, 2011, and every two years thereafter.