Passed by the House April 20, 2009 Yeas 89   FRANK CHOPP ________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives Passed by the Senate April 13, 2009 Yeas 47   BRAD OWEN ________________________________________ President of the Senate | I, Barbara Baker, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1349 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth. BARBARA BAKER ________________________________________ Chief Clerk | |
Approved May 4, 2009, 4:41 p.m. CHRISTINE GREGOIRE ________________________________________ Governor of the State of Washington | May 5, 2009 Secretary of State State of Washington |
State of Washington | 61st Legislature | 2009 Regular Session |
READ FIRST TIME 02/10/09.
AN ACT Relating to additional grounds for renewal of orders for less restrictive treatment; amending RCW 71.05.320; adding a new section to chapter 71.05 RCW; and creating a new section.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 (1) The legislature finds that many persons
who are released from involuntary mental health treatment in an
inpatient setting would benefit from an order for less restrictive
treatment in order to provide the structure and support necessary to
facilitate long-term stability and success in the community.
(2) The legislature intends to make it easier to renew orders for
less restrictive treatment following a period of inpatient commitment
in cases in which a person has been involuntarily committed more than
once and is likely to benefit from a renewed order for less restrictive
treatment.
(3) The legislature finds that public safety is enhanced when a
designated mental health professional is able to file a petition to
revoke an order for less restrictive treatment under RCW 71.05.340
before a person who is the subject of the petition becomes ill enough
to present a likelihood of serious harm.
Sec. 2 RCW 71.05.320
and 2008 c 213 s 9 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) If the court or jury finds that grounds set forth in RCW
71.05.280 have been proven and that the best interests of the person or
others will not be served by a less restrictive treatment which is an
alternative to detention, the court shall remand him or her to the
custody of the department or to a facility certified for ninety day
treatment by the department for a further period of intensive treatment
not to exceed ninety days from the date of judgment((: PROVIDED, That
(a))). If the grounds set forth in RCW 71.05.280(3) are the basis of
commitment, then the period of treatment may be up to but not exceed
one hundred eighty days from the date of judgment in a facility
certified for one hundred eighty day treatment by the department.
(((b) If the committed person has a developmental disability and
has been determined incompetent pursuant to RCW 10.77.086(4), and the
best interests of the person or others will not be served by a less-restrictive treatment which is an alternative to detention, the court
shall remand him or her to the custody of the department or to a
facility certified for one hundred eighty-day treatment by the
department. When appropriate and subject to available funds, treatment
and training of such persons must be provided in a program specifically
reserved for the treatment and training of persons with developmental
disabilities. A person so committed shall receive habilitation
services pursuant to an individualized service plan specifically
developed to treat the behavior which was the subject of the criminal
proceedings. The treatment program shall be administered by
developmental disabilities professionals and others trained
specifically in the needs of persons with developmental disabilities.
The department may limit admissions to this specialized program in
order to ensure that expenditures for services do not exceed amounts
appropriated by the legislature and allocated by the department for
such services. The department may establish admission priorities in
the event that the number of eligible persons exceeds the limits set by
the department. An order for treatment less restrictive than
involuntary detention may include conditions, and if such conditions
are not adhered to, the designated mental health professional or
developmental disabilities professional may order the person
apprehended under the terms and conditions of RCW 71.05.340.))
(2) If the court or jury finds that grounds set forth in RCW
71.05.280 have been proven, but finds that treatment less restrictive
than detention will be in the best interest of the person or others,
then the court shall remand him or her to the custody of the department
or to a facility certified for ninety day treatment by the department
or to a less restrictive alternative for a further period of less
restrictive treatment not to exceed ninety days from the date of
judgment((: PROVIDED, That)). If the grounds set forth in RCW
71.05.280(3) are the basis of commitment, then the period of treatment
may be up to but not exceed one hundred eighty days from the date of
judgment.
(3) The person shall be released from involuntary treatment at the
expiration of the period of commitment imposed under subsection (1) or
(2) of this section unless the superintendent or professional person in
charge of the facility in which he or she is confined, or in the event
of a less restrictive alternative, the designated mental health
professional ((or developmental disabilities professional)), files a
new petition for involuntary treatment on the grounds that the
committed person((;)):
(a) During the current period of court ordered treatment: (i) Has
threatened, attempted, or inflicted physical harm upon the person of
another, or substantial damage upon the property of another, and (ii)
as a result of mental disorder or developmental disability presents a
likelihood of serious harm; or
(b) Was taken into custody as a result of conduct in which he or
she attempted or inflicted serious physical harm upon the person of
another, and continues to present, as a result of mental disorder or
developmental disability a likelihood of serious harm; or
(c) Is in custody pursuant to RCW 71.05.280(3) and as a result of
mental disorder or developmental disability presents a substantial
likelihood of repeating similar acts considering the charged criminal
behavior, life history, progress in treatment, and the public safety;
or
(d) Continues to be gravely disabled.
If the conduct required to be proven in (b) and (c) of this
subsection was found by a judge or jury in a prior trial under this
chapter, it shall not be necessary to ((reprove that element)) prove
such conduct again. ((Such))
(4) For a person committed under subsection (2) of this section who
has been remanded to a period of less restrictive treatment, in
addition to the grounds specified in subsection (3) of this section,
the designated mental health professional may file a new petition for
continued less restrictive treatment if:
(a) The person was previously committed by a court to detention for
involuntary mental health treatment during the thirty-six months that
preceded the person's initial detention date during the current
involuntary commitment cycle, excluding any time spent in a mental
health facility or in confinement as a result of a criminal conviction;
(b) In view of the person's treatment history or current behavior,
the person is unlikely to voluntarily participate in outpatient
treatment without an order for less restrictive treatment; and
(c) Outpatient treatment that would be provided under a less
restrictive treatment order is necessary to prevent a relapse,
decompensation, or deterioration that is likely to result in the person
presenting a likelihood of serious harm or the person becoming gravely
disabled within a reasonably short period of time.
(5) A new petition for involuntary treatment filed under subsection
(3) or (4) of this section shall be filed and heard in the superior
court of the county of the facility which is filing the new petition
for involuntary treatment unless good cause is shown for a change of
venue. The cost of the proceedings shall be borne by the state.
(6) The hearing shall be held as provided in RCW 71.05.310, and if
the court or jury finds that the grounds for additional confinement as
set forth in this ((subsection)) section are present, the court may
order the committed person returned for an additional period of
treatment not to exceed one hundred eighty days from the date of
judgment. At the end of the one hundred eighty day period of
commitment, the committed person shall be released unless a petition
for another one hundred eighty day period of continued treatment is
filed and heard in the same manner as provided in this ((subsection))
section. Successive one hundred eighty day commitments are permissible
on the same grounds and pursuant to the same procedures as the original
one hundred eighty day commitment. However, a commitment is not
permissible under subsection (4) of this section if thirty-six months
have passed since the last date of discharge from detention for
inpatient treatment that preceded the current less restrictive
alternative order, nor shall a commitment under subsection (4) of this
section be permissible if the likelihood of serious harm in subsection
(4)(c) of this section is based solely on harm to the property of
others.
(((4))) (7) No person committed as provided in this section may be
detained unless a valid order of commitment is in effect. No order of
commitment can exceed one hundred eighty days in length.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 3 A new section is added to chapter 71.05 RCW
to read as follows:
When appropriate and subject to available funds, the treatment and
training of a person with a developmental disability who is committed
to the custody of the department or to a facility certified for ninety
day treatment by the department for a further period of intensive
treatment under RCW 71.05.320 must be provided in a program
specifically reserved for the treatment and training of persons with
developmental disabilities. A person so committed shall receive
habilitation services pursuant to an individualized service plan
specifically developed to treat the behavior which was the subject of
the criminal proceedings. The treatment program shall be administered
by developmental disabilities professionals and others trained
specifically in the needs of persons with developmental disabilities.
The department may limit admissions to this specialized program in
order to ensure that expenditures for services do not exceed amounts
appropriated by the legislature and allocated by the department for
such services. The department may establish admission priorities in
the event that the number of eligible persons exceeds the limits set by
the department.