CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2072

Chapter 515, Laws of 2009

(partial veto)

61st Legislature
2009 Regular Session



SPECIAL NEEDS TRANSPORTATION



EFFECTIVE DATE: 07/26/09

Passed by the House April 20, 2009
  Yeas 95   Nays 0

FRANK CHOPP
________________________________________    
Speaker of the House of Representatives


Passed by the Senate April 10, 2009
  Yeas 46   Nays 0


BRAD OWEN
________________________________________    
President of the Senate
 
CERTIFICATE

I, Barbara Baker, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2072 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth.


BARBARA BAKER
________________________________________    
Chief Clerk
Approved May 15, 2009, 2:36 p.m., with the exception of Sections 2, 5, 6, 7 and 19 which are vetoed.






CHRISTINE GREGOIRE
________________________________________    
Governor of the State of Washington
 
FILED
May 18, 2009







Secretary of State
State of Washington


_____________________________________________ 

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2072
_____________________________________________

AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE

Passed Legislature - 2009 Regular Session
State of Washington61st Legislature2009 Regular Session

By House Transportation (originally sponsored by Representatives Wallace, Clibborn, and Wood)

READ FIRST TIME 03/03/09.   



     AN ACT Relating to advancing effective transportation for persons with special transportation needs; amending RCW 47.06B.010, 47.06B.020, 47.06B.030, 47.06B.050, 36.73.020, 47.80.023, 47.06B.900, and 47.06B.901; adding new sections to chapter 47.06B RCW; adding a new section to chapter 28A.300 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 35.58 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 47.01 RCW; creating a new section; and providing an effective date.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1   A new section is added to chapter 47.06B RCW to read as follows:
     (1) In 2007, the legislature directed the joint transportation committee to conduct a study of special needs transportation to examine and evaluate the effectiveness of special needs transportation in the state. A particular goal of the study was to explore opportunities to enhance coordination of special needs transportation programs to ensure that they are delivered efficiently and result in improved access and increased mobility options for their clients. It is the intent of the legislature to further consider some of the recommendations, and to implement many of these recommendations in the form of two pilot projects that will test the potential for applying these recommendations statewide in the future.
     (2) The legislature is aware that the department of social and health services submitted an application in December of 2008 to the federal centers for medicare and medicaid services, seeking approval to use the medical match system, a federal funding system that has different requirements from the federal administrative match system currently used by the department. It is the intent of the legislature to advance the goals of this act and the recommendations of the study identified in subsection (1) of this section without jeopardizing the application made by the department.
     (3) By August 15, 2009, the agency council on coordinated transportation shall appoint a work group for the purpose of identifying relevant federal requirements related to special needs transportation, and identifying solutions to streamline the requirements and increase efficiencies in transportation services provided for persons with special transportation needs. To advance its purpose, the work group shall work with relevant federal representatives and agencies to identify and address various challenges and barriers.
     (4) Membership of the work group must include, but not be limited to, one or more representatives from:
     (a) The departments of transportation, veterans affairs, health, and social and health services;
     (b) Medicaid nonemergency medical transportation brokers;
     (c) Public transit agencies;
     (d) Regional and metropolitan transportation planning organizations, including a representative of the regional transportation planning organization or organizations that provide staff support to the local coordinating coalition established under section 9 of this act;
     (e) Indian tribes;
     (f) The agency council on coordinated transportation;
     (g) The local coordinating coalitions established under section 9 of this act; and
     (h) The office of the superintendent of public instruction.
     (5) The work group shall elect one or more of its members to service as chair or cochairs.
     (6) The work group shall immediately contact representatives of the federal congressional delegation for Washington state and the relevant federal agencies and coordinating authorities including, but not limited to, the federal transit administration, the United States department of health and human services, and the interagency transportation coordinating council on access and mobility, and invite the federal representatives to work collaboratively to:
     (a) Identify transportation definitions and terminology used in the various relevant state and federal programs, and establish consistent transportation definitions and terminology. For purposes of this subsection, relevant state definitions exclude terminology that requires a medical determination, including whether a trip or service is medically necessary;
     (b) Identify restrictions or barriers that preclude federal, state, and local agencies from sharing client lists or other client information, and make progress towards removing any restrictions or barriers;
     (c) Identify relevant state and federal performance and cost reporting systems and requirements, and work towards establishing consistent and uniform performance and cost reporting systems and requirements; and
     (d) Explore, subject to federal approval, opportunities to test cost allocation models, including the pilot projects established in section 11 of this act, that:
     (i) Allow for cost sharing among public paratransit and medicaid nonemergency medical trips; and
     (ii) Capture the value of medicaid trips provided by public transit agencies for which they are not currently reimbursed with a funding match by federal medicaid dollars.
     (7) By December 1, 2009, the work group shall submit a report to the joint transportation committee that explains the progress made towards the goals of this section and identifies any necessary legislative action that must be taken to implement all the provisions of this section. A second progress report must be submitted to the joint transportation committee by June 1, 2010, and a final report must be submitted to the joint transportation committee by December 1, 2010.

     *NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2   A new section is added to chapter 47.06B RCW to read as follows:
     (1) By August 15, 2009, the agency council on coordinated transportation shall appoint a work group to consider certain recommendations resulting from the study identified in section 1(1) of this act. In conducting its analysis, the work group must consult with the appropriate federal agencies, including the federal transit administration, the United States department of health and human services, and the interagency transportation coordinating council on access and mobility.
     (2) The work group must be chaired by a representative of the agency council on coordinated transportation, and members must include one or more representatives of:
     (a) Regional and metropolitan planning organizations;
     (b) Transit agencies;
     (c) Brokerages providing nonemergency medical transportation services; and
     (d) The department of social and health services.
     (3) The work group may consider any recommendation resulting from the study identified in section 1(1) of this act, and shall specifically consider the study's recommendations regarding the procurement and designation of community access managers, including:
     (a) The most appropriate agency to make those designations;
     (b) The preferred geographic regions in which to establish community access managers;
     (c) The duties and responsibilities of community access managers; and
     (d) Any study recommendations that may interfere with the department's application as described in section 1(2) of this act, and potential solutions to those issues.
     (4) The work group may also develop an alternative to the community access manager model proposed in the 2009 special needs transportation study recommendations, as described in section 1(1) of this act, as a recommendation to be considered by the joint transportation committee. Any proposed alternative model must build upon the work conducted in the pilot projects under section 11 of this act and the work completed in the 2009 study, and must be consistent with the goals of the 2009 study.
     (5) Subject to available funds, the work group may consult with other agencies and organizations as needed.
     (6) By December 1, 2009, the agency council on coordinated transportation shall submit a report to the joint transportation committee describing the work group's findings and recommendations for implementing the study recommendations. If the work group finds that additional time is needed to complete its analysis, a second progress report must be submitted to the joint transportation committee by June 1, 2010.
     *Sec. 2 was vetoed. See message at end of chapter.

Sec. 3   RCW 47.06B.010 and 2007 c 421 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
     The legislature finds that transportation systems for persons with special needs are not operated as efficiently as possible. In too many cases, programs established by the legislature to assist persons with special needs can not be accessed due to these inefficiencies and coordination barriers.
     The legislature further finds that the transportation needs of each community are unique, and that transportation services may be improved by establishing a system of statewide oversight that seeks input, collaboration, and cooperation from and among all local service providers, including public agencies, private organizations, and community-based groups.
     It is the intent of the legislature that public transportation agencies, pupil transportation programs, private nonprofit transportation providers, and other public agencies sponsoring programs that require transportation services coordinate those transportation services. Through coordination of transportation services, programs will achieve increased efficiencies and will be able to provide more rides to a greater number of persons with special needs.

Sec. 4   RCW 47.06B.020 and 2007 c 421 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) The agency council on coordinated transportation is created. The purpose of the council is to advance and improve accessibility to and coordination of special needs transportation services statewide. The council is composed of ((ten)) fourteen voting members and four nonvoting, legislative members.
     (2) The ((ten)) fourteen voting members are the superintendent of public instruction or a designee, the secretary of transportation or a designee, the secretary of the department of social and health services or a designee, and ((seven)) eleven members appointed by the governor as follows:
     (a) One representative from the office of the governor;
     (b) Three persons who are consumers of special needs transportation services, which must include:
     (i) One person designated by the executive director of the governor's committee on disability issues and employment; and
     (ii) One person who is designated by the executive director of the developmental disabilities council;
     (c) One representative from the Washington association of pupil transportation;
     (d) One representative from the Washington state transit association; ((and))
     (e) One of the following:
     (i) A representative from the community transportation association of the Northwest; or
     (ii) A representative from the community action council association;
     (f) One person who represents regional transportation planning organizations and metropolitan planning organizations;
     (g) One representative of brokers who provide nonemergency, medically necessary trips to persons with special transportation needs under the medicaid program administered by the department of social and health services;
     (h) One representative from the Washington state department of veterans affairs; and
     (i) One representative of the state association of counties
.
     (3) The four nonvoting members are legislators as follows:
     (a) Two members from the house of representatives, one from each of the two largest caucuses, appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives, including at least one member from the house transportation policy and budget committee or the house appropriations committee; and
     (b) Two members from the senate, one from each of the two largest caucuses, appointed by the president of the senate, including at least one member from the senate transportation committee or the senate ways and means committee.
     (4) Gubernatorial appointees of the council will serve two-year terms. Members may not receive compensation for their service on the council, but will be reimbursed for actual and necessary expenses incurred in performing their duties as members as set forth in RCW 43.03.220.
     (5) ((The secretary of transportation or a designee shall serve as the chair.
     (6)
)) The council shall vote on an annual basis to elect one of its voting members to serve as chair. The position of chair must rotate among the represented agencies, associations, and interest groups at least every two years. If the position of chair is vacated for any reason, the secretary of transportation or the secretary's designee shall serve as acting chair until the next regular meeting of the council, at which time the members will elect a chair.
     (6) The council shall periodically assess its membership to ensure that there exists a balanced representation of persons with special transportation needs and providers of special transportation needs services. Recommendations for modifying the membership of the council must be included in the council's biennial report to the legislature as provided in RCW 47.06B.050.
     (7)
The department of transportation shall provide necessary staff support for the council.
     (((7))) (8) The council may receive gifts, grants, or endowments from public or private sources that are made from time to time, in trust or otherwise, for the use and benefit of the purposes of the council and spend gifts, grants, or endowments or income from the public or private sources according to their terms, unless the receipt of the gifts, grants, or endowments violates RCW 42.17.710.
     (((8))) (9) The meetings of the council must be open to the public, with the agenda published in advance, and minutes kept and made available to the public. The public notice of the meetings must indicate that accommodations for persons with disabilities will be made available upon request.
     (((9))) (10) All meetings of the council must be held in locations that are readily accessible to public transportation, and must be scheduled for times when public transportation is available.
     (((10))) (11) The council shall make an effort to include presentations by and work sessions including persons with special transportation needs.

     *Sec. 5   RCW 47.06B.030 and 2007 c 421 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:
     (((1))) To assure implementation of an effective system of coordinated transportation that meets the needs of persons with special transportation needs, the agency council on coordinated transportation shall:
     (1) Consistent with the policy goals set forth in RCW 47.04.280, propose statewide policies and objectives, subject to enactment by the legislature, that are designed to advance the coordination of and to increase efficiencies in special needs transportation services;
     (2) A
dopt a biennial work plan that must, at a minimum:
     (a) Focus on projects that identify and address barriers in laws, policies, and procedures;
     (b) Focus on results; and
     (c) Identify and advocate for transportation system improvements for persons with special transportation needs((.
     (2) The council shall,
));
     (3) Collaborate with and monitor the efforts of the local coordinating coalitions established under section 9 of this act;
     (4) Establish uniform measurable outcome-based performance objectives and measures for evaluating:
     (a) The effectiveness of any grant programs administered by the council;
     (b) The council's progress made toward accomplishing its overall objectives; and
     (c) In collaboration with local coordinating coalitions established under section 9 of this act, the progress made in each region toward advancing coordination of and accessibility to special needs transportation services;
     (5) Periodically provide input and recommendations to local and regional planning organizations for advancing special needs coordinated transportation;
     (6) Appoint members to local coordinating coalitions, as provided in section 9 of this act;
     (7) Beginning with the 2009-2011 biennial transportation budget, and at the request of the department, review and assess applications made for state paratransit/special needs grants, as provided in section 223(1), chapter 121, Laws of 2008, or other special needs transportation grants administered by the department;
     (8) A
s necessary, convene work groups at the state, regional, or local level to develop and implement coordinated approaches to special needs transportation((.
     (3)
));
     (9)
To improve the service experienced by persons with special transportation needs, ((the council shall)) develop statewide guidelines for customer complaint processes so that information about policies regarding the complaint processes is available consistently and consumers are appropriately educated about available options. To be eligible for funding on or after January 1, 2008, organizations applying for state paratransit/special needs grants as described in section 226(1), chapter 370, Laws of 2006 must implement a process following the guidelines established by the council((.
     (4) The council shall
)); and
     (10) R
epresent the needs and interests of persons with special transportation needs in statewide efforts for emergency and disaster preparedness planning by advising the emergency management council on how to address transportation needs for high-risk individuals during and after disasters.
     *Sec. 5 was vetoed. See message at end of chapter.

     *NEW SECTION.  Sec. 6   A new section is added to chapter 47.06B RCW to read as follows:
     (1) The legislature acknowledges that successful models of coordination among state, regional, and local service providers recognize that cost accounting and cost allocation are integral components in meeting the statutory obligations of the various funding sources that may be used to support the purchase of services from special needs transportation service providers. To that end, the agency council on coordinated transportation must work collaboratively with any appropriate agencies and transportation providers and organizations to:
     (a) Develop and adopt common units of service definitions including, but not limited to, definitions for vehicle miles, vehicle hours, and passenger trips, consistent with any relevant definitions established under section 1 of this act. For purposes of this subsection, "common units of service" excludes elements involving medical determinations, including whether a trip type or transportation service is medically necessary; and
     (b) Develop uniform performance and cost reporting systems, consistent with performance and cost reporting systems established under section 1 of this act.
     (2) By December 1, 2009, the agency council on coordinated transportation shall submit a report to the joint transportation committee that, at a minimum, describes the progress made towards the goals of this section. If necessary, a second progress report must be submitted to the joint transportation committee by June 1, 2010, and a final report must be submitted to the joint transportation committee by December 1, 2010.
     *Sec. 6 was vetoed. See message at end of chapter.

     *NEW SECTION.  Sec. 7   A new section is added to chapter 47.06B RCW to read as follows:
     (1) In cooperation with the department of social and health services and the Washington state patrol, the agency council on coordinated transportation shall make progress toward the goal of establishing a single clearinghouse for driver background checks within the most cost-effective agency. To that end, the council shall, at a minimum:
     (a) Review any previous relevant studies;
     (b) Identify and collaborate with agencies engaged in background check analysis; and
     (c) Develop a work plan to achieve the objectives identified in this subsection.
     (2) By December 1, 2009, the agency council on coordinated transportation shall submit a report to the joint transportation committee that, at a minimum, describes the progress made towards the goals of this section. If necessary, a second progress report must be submitted to the joint transportation committee by June 1, 2010, and a final report must be submitted to the joint transportation committee by December 1, 2010.
     *Sec. 7 was vetoed. See message at end of chapter.

Sec. 8   RCW 47.06B.050 and 2007 c 421 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:
     The agency council on coordinated transportation shall submit a progress report ((on council activities)) to the legislature by December 1, 2009, and every other year thereafter. The report must describe the council's progress in achieving its objectives and in attaining the applicable goals identified in the council's biennial work plan and highlight any problems encountered in achieving these goals. The report must also include the required performance measure evaluations established in RCW 47.06B.030(4). The information will be reported in a form established by the council.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 9   A new section is added to chapter 47.06B RCW to read as follows:
     (1) A local coordinating coalition is created in each nonemergency medical transportation brokerage region, as designated by the department of social and health services, that encompasses:
     (a) A single county that has a population of more than seven hundred fifty thousand but less than one million; and
     (b) Five counties, and is comprised of at least one county that has a population of more than four hundred thousand.
     (2) The purpose of a local coordinating coalition is to advance local efforts to coordinate and maximize efficiencies in special needs transportation programs and services, contributing to the overall objectives and goals of the agency council on coordinated transportation. The local coordinating coalition shall serve in an advisory capacity to the agency council on coordinated transportation by providing the council with a focused and ongoing assessment of the special transportation needs and services provided within its region.
     (3) The composition and size of each local coordinating coalition may vary by region. Local coordinating coalition members, appointed by the chair of the agency council on coordinated transportation to two-year terms, must reflect a balanced representation of the region's providers of special needs transportation services and must include:
     (a) Members of existing local coordinating coalitions, with approval by those members;
     (b) One or more representatives of the public transit agency or agencies serving the region;
     (c) One or more representatives of private service providers;
     (d) A representative of civic or community-based service providers;
     (e) A consumer of special needs transportation services;
     (f) A representative of nonemergency medical transportation medicaid brokers;
     (g) A representative of social and human service programs;
     (h) A representative of local high school districts; and
     (i) A representative from the Washington state department of veterans affairs.
     (4) Each coalition shall vote on an annual basis to elect one of its members to serve as chair. The position of chair must rotate among the represented members at least every two years. If the position of chair is vacated for any reason, the member representing the regional transportation planning organization described in subsection (6) of this section shall serve as acting chair until the next regular meeting of the coalition, at which time the members will elect a chair.
     (5) Regular meetings of the local coordinating coalition may be convened at the call of the chair or by a majority of the members. Meetings must be open to the public, and held in locations that are readily accessible to public transportation.
     (6) The regional transportation planning organization, as described in chapter 47.80 RCW, serving the region in which the local coordinating coalition is created shall provide necessary staff support for the local coordinating coalition. In regions served by more than one regional transportation planning organization, unless otherwise agreed to by the relevant planning organizations, the regional transportation planning organization serving the largest population within the region shall provide the necessary staff support.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 10   A new section is added to chapter 47.06B RCW to read as follows:
     Local coordinating coalitions established under section 9 of this act shall:
     (1) Identify, to the greatest extent possible, all local transportation facilities, services, and providers serving persons with special transportation needs in the region, including public transit agencies, private companies, nonprofit organizations, and community- based groups. For each service provider, the coalition shall identify the boundaries within which services are provided;      
     (2) Identify local service needs, including connectivity gaps and other barriers to reliable and efficient transportation within and across service boundaries;
     (3) Consider strategies to address the local service needs and gaps identified in subsection (2) of this section;
     (4) In consultation with the agency council on coordinated transportation, collaborate with local service providers and operators to identify and propose common connectivity standards. The connectivity standards must, at a minimum, address signage, transit information, schedule coordination, and services provided to address access to and from a transit stop or facility; and
     (5) Beginning December 1, 2009, submit an annual report to the agency council on coordinated transportation that must, at a minimum, describe local efforts to coordinate and maximize efficiencies in special needs transportation programs and services, and progress made in addressing the duties described in this section.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 11   A new section is added to chapter 47.06B RCW to read as follows:
     (1) In addition to the duties identified in sections 9 and 10 of this act, each local coordinating coalition shall develop or implement a pilot project within the coalition's region, as described under section 9(1) of this act, for the purpose of demonstrating cost sharing and cost saving opportunities as described in subsection (2) of this section, and shall keep the agency council on coordinated transportation informed of progress made toward implementing the pilot project. In developing or implementing the pilot project, the local coordinating coalition shall collaborate with the appropriate federal agencies, including the federal transit authority and United States department of health and human services, and may collaborate with other agencies and organizations as deemed appropriate.
     (2) The pilot project must be designed to:
     (a) Demonstrate opportunities for cost sharing, including but not limited to opportunities among public paratransit and medicaid nonemergency medical trips; and
     (b) Test the feasibility of capturing the value of medicaid trips provided by public transit agencies for which they are not currently reimbursed with a funding match by federal medicaid dollars.
     (3) By December 1, 2009, and by June 1, 2010, each local coordinating coalition shall submit a status report to the joint transportation committee and agency council on coordinated transportation describing progress made in implementing the pilot project. By December 1, 2010, each local coordinating coalition shall issue a final report to the joint transportation committee and the agency council on coordinated transportation describing progress made in implementing the pilot project.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 12   A new section is added to chapter 28A.300 RCW to read as follows:
     By December 31, 2010, the office of the superintendent of public instruction shall establish a uniform process designed to track the additional expenditures for transporting homeless students, including expenditures required under the McKinney Vento act, reauthorized as Title X, Part C, of the no child left behind act, P.L. 107-110, in January 2002. Once established, the superintendent shall adopt the necessary administrative rules to direct each school district to adopt and use the uniform process and track these expenditures. The superintendent shall provide information annually to the agency council on coordinated transportation, created in chapter 47.06B RCW, on total expenditures related to the transportation of homeless students.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 13   A new section is added to chapter 35.58 RCW to read as follows:
     A municipality, as defined in RCW 35.58.272, and each regional transit authority shall work collaboratively with the appropriate local coordinating coalition or coalitions as described under section 9 of this act to advance the coordination of and maximize efficiencies in transportation services provided to persons with special transportation needs as defined in RCW 47.06B.012.

Sec. 14   RCW 36.73.020 and 2006 c 311 s 25 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) The legislative authority of a county or city may establish a transportation benefit district within the county or city area or within the area specified in subsection (2) of this section, for the purpose of acquiring, constructing, improving, providing, and funding a transportation improvement within the district that is consistent with any existing state, regional, and local transportation plans and necessitated by existing or reasonably foreseeable congestion levels. The transportation improvements shall be owned by the county of jurisdiction if located in an unincorporated area, by the city of jurisdiction if located in an incorporated area, or by the state in cases where the transportation improvement is or becomes a state highway. However, if deemed appropriate by the governing body of the transportation benefit district, a transportation improvement may be owned by a participating port district or transit district, unless otherwise prohibited by law. Transportation improvements shall be administered and maintained as other public streets, roads, highways, and transportation improvements. To the extent practicable, the district shall consider the following criteria when selecting transportation improvements:
     (a) Reduced risk of transportation facility failure and improved safety;
     (b) Improved travel time;
     (c) Improved air quality;
     (d) Increases in daily and peak period trip capacity;
     (e) Improved modal connectivity;
     (f) Improved freight mobility;
     (g) Cost-effectiveness of the investment;
     (h) Optimal performance of the system through time; ((and))
     (i) Improved accessibility for, or other benefits to, persons with special transportation needs as defined in RCW 47.06B.012; and
     (j)
Other criteria, as adopted by the governing body.
     (2) Subject to subsection (6) of this section, the district may include area within more than one county, city, port district, county transportation authority, or public transportation benefit area, if the legislative authority of each participating jurisdiction has agreed to the inclusion as provided in an interlocal agreement adopted pursuant to chapter 39.34 RCW. However, the boundaries of the district need not include all territory within the boundaries of the participating jurisdictions comprising the district.
     (3) The members of the legislative authority proposing to establish the district, acting ex officio and independently, shall constitute the governing body of the district: PROVIDED, That where a district includes area within more than one jurisdiction under subsection (2) of this section, the district shall be governed under an interlocal agreement adopted pursuant to chapter 39.34 RCW. However, the governing body shall be composed of at least five members including at least one elected official from the legislative authority of each participating jurisdiction.
     (4) The treasurer of the jurisdiction proposing to establish the district shall act as the ex officio treasurer of the district, unless an interlocal agreement states otherwise.
     (5) The electors of the district shall all be registered voters residing within the district.
     (6) Prior to December 1, 2007, the authority under this section, regarding the establishment of or the participation in a district, shall not apply to:
     (a) Counties with a population greater than one million five hundred thousand persons and any adjoining counties with a population greater than five hundred thousand persons;
     (b) Cities with any area within the counties under (a) of this subsection; and
     (c) Other jurisdictions with any area within the counties under (a) of this subsection.

Sec. 15   RCW 47.80.023 and 2007 c 421 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:
     Each regional transportation planning organization shall have the following duties:
     (1) Prepare and periodically update a transportation strategy for the region. The strategy shall address alternative transportation modes and transportation demand management measures in regional corridors and shall recommend preferred transportation policies to implement adopted growth strategies. The strategy shall serve as a guide in preparation of the regional transportation plan.
     (2) Prepare a regional transportation plan as set forth in RCW 47.80.030 that is consistent with county-wide planning policies if such have been adopted pursuant to chapter 36.70A RCW, with county, city, and town comprehensive plans, and state transportation plans.
     (3) Certify by December 31, 1996, that the transportation elements of comprehensive plans adopted by counties, cities, and towns within the region reflect the guidelines and principles developed pursuant to RCW 47.80.026, are consistent with the adopted regional transportation plan, and, where appropriate, conform with the requirements of RCW 36.70A.070.
     (4) Where appropriate, certify that county-wide planning policies adopted under RCW 36.70A.210 and the adopted regional transportation plan are consistent.
     (5) Develop, in cooperation with the department of transportation, operators of public transportation services and local governments within the region, a six-year regional transportation improvement program which proposes regionally significant transportation projects and programs and transportation demand management measures. The regional transportation improvement program shall be based on the programs, projects, and transportation demand management measures of regional significance as identified by transit agencies, cities, and counties pursuant to RCW 35.58.2795, 35.77.010, and 36.81.121, respectively, and any recommended programs or projects identified by the agency council on coordinated transportation, as provided in chapter 47.06B RCW, that advance special needs coordinated transportation as defined in RCW 47.06B.012. The program shall include a priority list of projects and programs, project segments and programs, transportation demand management measures, and a specific financial plan that demonstrates how the transportation improvement program can be funded. The program shall be updated at least every two years for the ensuing six-year period.
     (6) Include specific opportunities and projects to advance special needs coordinated transportation, as defined in RCW 47.06B.012, in the coordinated transit-human services transportation plan, after providing opportunity for public comment.
     (7)
Designate a lead planning agency to coordinate preparation of the regional transportation plan and carry out the other responsibilities of the organization. The lead planning agency may be a regional organization, a component county, city, or town agency, or the appropriate Washington state department of transportation district office.
     (((7))) (8) Review level of service methodologies used by cities and counties planning under chapter 36.70A RCW to promote a consistent regional evaluation of transportation facilities and corridors.
     (((8))) (9) Work with cities, counties, transit agencies, the department of transportation, and others to develop level of service standards or alternative transportation performance measures.
     (((9))) (10) Submit to the agency council on coordinated transportation, as provided in chapter 47.06B RCW, beginning on July 1, 2007, and every four years thereafter, an updated plan that includes the elements identified by the council. Each regional transportation planning organization must submit to the council every two years a prioritized regional human service and transportation project list.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 16   A new section is added to chapter 47.01 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) To be eligible for funding on or after January 1, 2010, any organization applying for state paratransit/special needs grants, as described in section 223(1), chapter 121, Laws of 2008, or for other funding provided for persons with special transportation needs, as defined in RCW 47.06B.012, must include in its application, in addition to meeting other eligibility requirements provided in law, an explanation of how the requested funding will advance efficiencies in, accessibility to, or coordination of transportation services provided to persons with special transportation needs as defined in RCW 47.06B.012.
     (2) Unless otherwise required by law, in administering federal funding provided for special needs transportation purposes, including funding under SAFETEA-LU, the safe, accountable, flexible, efficient transportation equity act, P.L. 109-59, or its successor, the department shall give priority to projects that result in increased efficiencies in special needs transportation or improved coordination among special needs transportation service providers.
     (3) In making final grant award determinations under subsection (1) of this section, the department shall seek input from the agency council on coordinated transportation, as provided in chapter 47.06B RCW, and shall give substantial deference to applications recommended by the council.

Sec. 17   RCW 47.06B.900 and 2007 c 421 s 8 are each amended to read as follows:
     The agency council on coordinated transportation is terminated on June 30, ((2010)) 2011, as provided in RCW 47.06B.901.

Sec. 18   RCW 47.06B.901 and 2007 c 421 s 9 are each amended to read as follows:
     The following acts or parts of acts, as now existing or hereafter amended, are each repealed, effective June 30, ((2011)) 2012:
     (1) RCW 47.06B.010 and 2009 c . . . s 3 (section 3 of this act), 2007 c 421 § 1, 1999 c 385 § 1, & 1998 c 173 § 1;
     (2) RCW 47.06B.012 and 1999 c 385 § 2;
     (3) RCW 47.06B.020 and 2009 c . . . s 4 (section 4 of this act), 2007 c 421 § 2, & 1998 c 173 § 2;
     (4) RCW 47.06B.030 and 2009 c . . . s 5 (section 5 of this act), 2007 c 421 § 3, 1999 c 385 § 5, & 1998 c 173 § 3;
     (5) RCW 47.06B.040 and 2007 c 421 § 4 & 1999 c 385 § 6; ((and))
     (6) RCW 47.06B.050 and 2009 c . . . s 8 (section 8 of this act) & 2007 c 421 § 6;
     (7) Section 1 of this act;
     (8) Section 2 of this act;
     (9) Section 6 of this act;
     (10) Section 7 of this act;
     (11) Section 9 of this act;
     (12) Section 10 of this act; and
     (13) Section 11 of this act
.

     *NEW SECTION.  Sec. 19   If specific funding for the purposes of this act, referencing this act by bill or chapter number, is not provided by June 30, 2009, in the omnibus transportation appropriations act, this act is null and void.
     *Sec. 19 was vetoed. See message at end of chapter.


         Passed by the House April 20, 2009.
         Passed by the Senate April 10, 2009.
         Approved by the Governor May 15, 2009, with the exception of certain items that were vetoed.
         Filed in Office of Secretary of State May 18, 2009.

     Note: Governor's explanation of partial veto is as follows:

"I have approved, except for Sections 2, 5, 6, 7 and 19, Engrossed Substitute House Bill 2072 entitled:

     "AN ACT Relating to advancing effective transportation for persons with special transportation needs."

Section 19 of the bill makes the provisions of the legislation null and void if sufficient funding to implement the legislation is not included in the 2009-11 Transportation Budget. The 2009-11 Transportation Budget does include sufficient funding to implement portions of the legislation, but not the entire bill. I have decided to veto Sections 2, 5, 6 and 7 of the legislation that do not have sufficient funding for implementation, as well as the null and void clause in Section 19. As a result, we will be able to move forward with providing special needs transportation services in a more coordinated and efficient manner, without imposing unfunded mandates on state agencies.

For these reasons, I have vetoed Sections 2, 5, 6, 7 and 19 of Engrossed Substitute House Bill 2072.

With the exception of Sections 2, 5, 6, 7 and 19, Engrossed Substitute House Bill 2072 is approved."