CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2876

Chapter 209, Laws of 2010

(partial veto)

61st Legislature
2010 Regular Session



PAIN MANAGEMENT--ADOPTION OF RULES



EFFECTIVE DATE: 06/10/10

Passed by the House March 11, 2010
  Yeas 96   Nays 1

FRANK CHOPP
________________________________________    
Speaker of the House of Representatives


Passed by the Senate March 11, 2010
  Yeas 36   Nays 12


BRAD OWEN
________________________________________    
President of the Senate
 
CERTIFICATE

I, Barbara Baker, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2876 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth.


BARBARA BAKER
________________________________________    
Chief Clerk
Approved March 25, 2010, 3:40 p.m., with the exception of Section 8 which is vetoed.







CHRISTINE GREGOIRE
________________________________________    
Governor of the State of Washington
 
FILED
March 26, 2010







Secretary of State
State of Washington


_____________________________________________ 

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2876
_____________________________________________

AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE

Passed Legislature - 2010 Regular Session
State of Washington61st Legislature2010 Regular Session

By House Health Care & Wellness (originally sponsored by Representatives Moeller, Green, and Morrell)

READ FIRST TIME 01/26/10.   



     AN ACT Relating to pain management; adding a new section to chapter 18.22 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 18.32 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 18.57 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 18.57A RCW; adding a new section to chapter 18.71 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 18.71A RCW; adding a new section to chapter 18.79 RCW; and creating a new section.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1   A new section is added to chapter 18.22 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) By June 30, 2011, the board shall repeal its rules on pain management, WAC 246-922-510 through 246-922-540.
     (2) By June 30, 2011, the board shall adopt new rules on chronic, noncancer pain management that contain the following elements:
     (a)(i) Dosing criteria, including:
     (A) A dosage amount that must not be exceeded unless a podiatric physician and surgeon first consults with a practitioner specializing in pain management; and
     (B) Exigent or special circumstances under which the dosage amount may be exceeded without consultation with a practitioner specializing in pain management.
     (ii) The rules regarding consultation with a practitioner specializing in pain management must, to the extent practicable, take into account:
     (A) Circumstances under which repeated consultations would not be necessary or appropriate for a patient undergoing a stable, ongoing course of treatment for pain management;
     (B) Minimum training and experience that is sufficient to exempt a podiatric physician and surgeon from the specialty consultation requirement;
     (C) Methods for enhancing the availability of consultations;
     (D) Allowing the efficient use of resources; and
     (E) Minimizing the burden on practitioners and patients.
     (b) Guidance on when to seek specialty consultation and ways in which electronic specialty consultations may be sought;
     (c) Guidance on tracking clinical progress by using assessment tools focusing on pain interference, physical function, and overall risk for poor outcome; and
     (d) Guidance on tracking the use of opioids.
     (3) The board shall consult with the agency medical directors' group, the department of health, the University of Washington, and the largest professional association of podiatric physicians and surgeons in the state.
     (4) The rules adopted under this section do not apply:
     (a) To the provision of palliative, hospice, or other end-of-life care; or
     (b) To the management of acute pain caused by an injury or a surgical procedure.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2   A new section is added to chapter 18.32 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) By June 30, 2011, the commission shall adopt new rules on chronic, noncancer pain management that contain the following elements:
     (a)(i) Dosing criteria, including:
     (A) A dosage amount that must not be exceeded unless a dentist first consults with a practitioner specializing in pain management; and
     (B) Exigent or special circumstances under which the dosage amount may be exceeded without consultation with a practitioner specializing in pain management.
     (ii) The rules regarding consultation with a practitioner specializing in pain management must, to the extent practicable, take into account:
     (A) Circumstances under which repeated consultations would not be necessary or appropriate for a patient undergoing a stable, ongoing course of treatment for pain management;
     (B) Minimum training and experience that is sufficient to exempt a dentist from the specialty consultation requirement;
     (C) Methods for enhancing the availability of consultations;
     (D) Allowing the efficient use of resources; and
     (E) Minimizing the burden on practitioners and patients.
     (b) Guidance on when to seek specialty consultation and ways in which electronic specialty consultations may be sought;
     (c) Guidance on tracking clinical progress by using assessment tools focusing on pain interference, physical function, and overall risk for poor outcome; and
     (d) Guidance on tracking the use of opioids.
     (2) The commission shall consult with the agency medical directors' group, the department of health, the University of Washington, and the largest professional association of dentists in the state.
     (3) The rules adopted under this section do not apply:
     (a) To the provision of palliative, hospice, or other end-of-life care; or
     (b) To the management of acute pain caused by an injury or a surgical procedure.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3   A new section is added to chapter 18.57 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) By June 30, 2011, the board shall repeal its rules on pain management, WAC 246-853-510 through 246-853-540.
     (2) By June 30, 2011, the board shall adopt new rules on chronic, noncancer pain management that contain the following elements:
     (a)(i) Dosing criteria, including:
     (A) A dosage amount that must not be exceeded unless an osteopathic physician and surgeon first consults with a practitioner specializing in pain management; and
     (B) Exigent or special circumstances under which the dosage amount may be exceeded without consultation with a practitioner specializing in pain management.
     (ii) The rules regarding consultation with a practitioner specializing in pain management must, to the extent practicable, take into account:
     (A) Circumstances under which repeated consultations would not be necessary or appropriate for a patient undergoing a stable, ongoing course of treatment for pain management;
     (B) Minimum training and experience that is sufficient to exempt an osteopathic physician and surgeon from the specialty consultation requirement;
     (C) Methods for enhancing the availability of consultations;
     (D) Allowing the efficient use of resources; and
     (E) Minimizing the burden on practitioners and patients.
     (b) Guidance on when to seek specialty consultation and ways in which electronic specialty consultations may be sought;
     (c) Guidance on tracking clinical progress by using assessment tools focusing on pain interference, physical function, and overall risk for poor outcome; and
     (d) Guidance on tracking the use of opioids, particularly in the emergency department.
     (3) The board shall consult with the agency medical directors' group, the department of health, the University of Washington, and the largest association of osteopathic physicians and surgeons in the state.
     (4) The rules adopted under this section do not apply:
     (a) To the provision of palliative, hospice, or other end-of-life care; or
     (b) To the management of acute pain caused by an injury or a surgical procedure.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4   A new section is added to chapter 18.57A RCW to read as follows:
     (1) By June 30, 2011, the board shall repeal its rules on pain management, WAC 246-854-120 through 246-854-150.
     (2) By June 30, 2011, the board shall adopt new rules on chronic, noncancer pain management that contain the following elements:
     (a)(i) Dosing criteria, including:
     (A) A dosage amount that must not be exceeded unless an osteopathic physician's assistant first consults with a practitioner specializing in pain management; and
     (B) Exigent or special circumstances under which the dosage amount may be exceeded without consultation with a practitioner specializing in pain management.
     (ii) The rules regarding consultation with a practitioner specializing in pain management must, to the extent practicable, take into account:
     (A) Circumstances under which repeated consultations would not be necessary or appropriate for a patient undergoing a stable, ongoing course of treatment for pain management;
     (B) Minimum training and experience that is sufficient to exempt an osteopathic physician's assistant from the specialty consultation requirement;
     (C) Methods for enhancing the availability of consultations;
     (D) Allowing the efficient use of resources; and
     (E) Minimizing the burden on practitioners and patients.
     (b) Guidance on when to seek specialty consultation and ways in which electronic specialty consultations may be sought;
     (c) Guidance on tracking clinical progress by using assessment tools focusing on pain interference, physical function, and overall risk for poor outcome; and
     (d) Guidance on tracking the use of opioids, particularly in the emergency department.
     (3) The board shall consult with the agency medical directors' group, the department of health, the University of Washington, and the largest association of osteopathic physician's assistants in the state.
     (4) The rules adopted under this section do not apply:
     (a) To the provision of palliative, hospice, or other end-of-life care; or
     (b) To the management of acute pain caused by an injury or a surgical procedure.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 5   A new section is added to chapter 18.71 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) By June 30, 2011, the commission shall repeal its rules on pain management, WAC 246-919-800 through 246-919-830.
     (2) By June 30, 2011, the commission shall adopt new rules on chronic, noncancer pain management that contain the following elements:
     (a)(i) Dosing criteria, including:
     (A) A dosage amount that must not be exceeded unless a physician first consults with a practitioner specializing in pain management; and
     (B) Exigent or special circumstances under which the dosage amount may be exceeded without consultation with a practitioner specializing in pain management.
     (ii) The rules regarding consultation with a practitioner specializing in pain management must, to the extent practicable, take into account:
     (A) Circumstances under which repeated consultations would not be necessary or appropriate for a patient undergoing a stable, ongoing course of treatment for pain management;
     (B) Minimum training and experience that is sufficient to exempt a physician from the specialty consultation requirement;
     (C) Methods for enhancing the availability of consultations;
     (D) Allowing the efficient use of resources; and
     (E) Minimizing the burden on practitioners and patients.
     (b) Guidance on when to seek specialty consultation and ways in which electronic specialty consultations may be sought;
     (c) Guidance on tracking clinical progress by using assessment tools focusing on pain interference, physical function, and overall risk for poor outcome; and
     (d) Guidance on tracking the use of opioids, particularly in the emergency department.
     (3) The commission shall consult with the agency medical directors' group, the department of health, the University of Washington, and the largest professional association of physicians in the state.
     (4) The rules adopted under this section do not apply:
     (a) To the provision of palliative, hospice, or other end-of-life care; or
     (b) To the management of acute pain caused by an injury or a surgical procedure.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 6   A new section is added to chapter 18.71A RCW to read as follows:
     (1) By June 30, 2011, the commission shall adopt new rules on chronic, noncancer pain management that contain the following elements:
     (a)(i) Dosing criteria, including:
     (A) A dosage amount that must not be exceeded unless a physician assistant first consults with a practitioner specializing in pain management; and
     (B) Exigent or special circumstances under which the dosage amount may be exceeded without consultation with a practitioner specializing in pain management.
     (ii) The rules regarding consultation with a practitioner specializing in pain management must, to the extent practicable, take into account:
     (A) Circumstances under which repeated consultations would not be necessary or appropriate for a patient undergoing a stable, ongoing course of treatment for pain management;
     (B) Minimum training and experience that is sufficient to exempt a physician assistant from the specialty consultation requirement;
     (C) Methods for enhancing the availability of consultations;
     (D) Allowing the efficient use of resources; and
     (E) Minimizing the burden on practitioners and patients.
     (b) Guidance on when to seek specialty consultation and ways in which electronic specialty consultations may be sought;
     (c) Guidance on tracking clinical progress by using assessment tools focusing on pain interference, physical function, and overall risk for poor outcome; and
     (d) Guidance on tracking the use of opioids, particularly in the emergency department.
     (2) The commission shall consult with the agency medical directors' group, the department of health, the University of Washington, and the largest professional association of physician assistants in the state.
     (3) The rules adopted under this section do not apply:
     (a) To the provision of palliative, hospice, or other end-of-life care; or
     (b) To the management of acute pain caused by an injury or a surgical procedure.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 7   A new section is added to chapter 18.79 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) By June 30, 2011, the commission shall adopt new rules on chronic, noncancer pain management that contain the following elements:
     (a)(i) Dosing criteria, including:
     (A) A dosage amount that must not be exceeded unless an advanced registered nurse practitioner or certified registered nurse anesthetist first consults with a practitioner specializing in pain management; and
     (B) Exigent or special circumstances under which the dosage amount may be exceeded without consultation with a practitioner specializing in pain management.
     (ii) The rules regarding consultation with a practitioner specializing in pain management must, to the extent practicable, take into account:
     (A) Circumstances under which repeated consultations would not be necessary or appropriate for a patient undergoing a stable, ongoing course of treatment for pain management;
     (B) Minimum training and experience that is sufficient to exempt an advanced registered nurse practitioner or certified registered nurse anesthetist from the specialty consultation requirement;
     (C) Methods for enhancing the availability of consultations;
     (D) Allowing the efficient use of resources; and
     (E) Minimizing the burden on practitioners and patients.
     (b) Guidance on when to seek specialty consultation and ways in which electronic specialty consultations may be sought;
     (c) Guidance on tracking clinical progress by using assessment tools focusing on pain interference, physical function, and overall risk for poor outcome; and
     (d) Guidance on tracking the use of opioids, particularly in the emergency department.
     (2) The commission shall consult with the agency medical directors' group, the department of health, the University of Washington, and the largest professional associations for advanced registered nurse practitioners and certified registered nurse anesthetists in the state.
     (3) The rules adopted under this section do not apply:
     (a) To the provision of palliative, hospice, or other end-of-life care; or
     (b) To the management of acute pain caused by an injury or a surgical procedure.

     *NEW SECTION.  Sec. 8   (1) The boards and commissions required to adopt rules on pain management under sections 1 through 7 of this act shall work collaboratively to ensure that the rules are as uniform as practicable.
     (2) On January 11, 2011, each of the boards and commissions required to adopt rules on pain management under sections 1 through 7 of this act shall submit the proposed rules required by this act to the appropriate committees of the legislature.
     *Sec. 8 was vetoed. See message at end of chapter.


         Passed by the House March 11, 2010.
         Passed by the Senate March 11, 2010.
         Approved by the Governor March 25, 2010, with the exception of certain items that were vetoed.
         Filed in Office of Secretary of State March 26, 2010.

     Note: Governor's explanation of partial veto is as follows:

"I am returning herewith, without my approval as to Section 8, Engrossed Substitute House Bill 2876 entitled:

     "AN ACT Relating to pain management."

The bill generally requires state health care boards and commissions to adopt rules, including dosage standards, on chronic, noncancer pain management. Section 8, however, requires that before final adoption, these rules be submitted to the Legislature.

Members of the Legislature may review agency rules, proposed or final, and their perspectives are valuable. However, requiring proposed rules to be submitted to the Legislature would infringe upon the role of the executive branch and would blur the distinction between the Legislature and a state agency with regard to the rulemaking process.

For these reasons, I have vetoed Section 8 of Engrossed Substitute House Bill 2876.

With the exception of Section 8, Engrossed Substitute House Bill 2876 is approved."