HOUSE BILL REPORT

HB 1473

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Brief History:

Committee Activity:

Transportation: 2/16/11, 2/22/11 [DP].

Floor Activity:

Passed House: 3/5/11, 98-0.

Senate Amended.

Passed Senate: 4/4/11, 41-7.

House Concurred.

Passed House: 4/13/11, 96-0.

Passed Legislature.

Brief Summary of Bill

Allows fees collected for attending a traffic school provided by a city, town, or county that are in excess of the cost of providing the traffic school to be used for safe driving materials and programs, safe driving promotions and advertising, and law enforcement training.
Limits the fee charged for traffic schools to the amount of the penalty for an unscheduled traffic infraction.

Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 27 members: Representatives Clibborn, Chair; Liias, Vice Chair; Armstrong, Ranking Minority Member; Hargrove, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Angel, Asay, Eddy, Finn, Fitzgibbon, Jinkins, Johnson, Klippert, Kristiansen, Ladenburg, Moeller, Morris, Moscoso, Overstreet, Reykdal, Rivers, Rodne, Rolfes, Ryu, Shea, Takko, Upthegrove and Zeiger.

Background:

In Washington, individuals may defer one moving and one non-moving violation every seven years. As a condition of this deferral, courts may impose such conditions as the court feels appropriate, which often includes attendance at a driver improvement school or traffic school. If the individual meets all of the required conditions and has not committed another infraction, the court may dismiss the infraction at the end of the deferral period.

With certain limited exceptions, the Washington Supreme Court prescribes the schedule of monetary penalties for traffic infractions. Infraction rule for courts of limited jurisdictions 6.2 contains this schedule of monetary penalties and prescribes a base penalty of $42 for unscheduled infractions, which increases to $124 when various penalties and assessments are added to the base amount.

Summary of Bill:

The fees collected for attending a traffic school provided by a city, town, or county that are in excess of the cost of providing the traffic school may be used for the following activities:

safe driver education materials and programs;
safe driver education promotions and advertising; and
costs associated with the training of law enforcement officers.

A traffic school established by a city, town, or county may not charge a fee in excess of the penalty for an unscheduled traffic infraction established by the Washington Supreme Court, which is defined to include all assessments and other costs that are required by statute or rule to be added to the base penalty.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) Traffic schools are an effective alternative that work for violators. However, there are restrictions on the way that the funds generated can be used that prevent the funds from being used to fund law enforcement. This bill would allow the City of Spokane, and other jurisdictions that operate traffic schools, to use any excess funds to put more law enforcement officers on the street.

(Opposed) None.