HOUSE BILL REPORT

HB 2502

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Reported by House Committee On:

Ways & Means

Title: An act relating to modifying exceptions to the compensating tax provisions for removal from forest land classification to more closely parallel open space property tax provisions.

Brief Description: Modifying exceptions to the compensating tax provisions for removal from forest land classification to more closely parallel open space property tax provisions.

Sponsors: Representatives Hansen and Appleton.

Brief History:

Committee Activity:

Ways & Means: 1/24/12, 2/6/12 [DPS].

Brief Summary of Substitute Bill

  • Extends the exception for payment of back taxes on designated forest land sold or transferred for the purpose of conserving open space land to include counties west of the crest of the Cascade Mountains.

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON WAYS & MEANS

Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 27 members: Representatives Hunter, Chair; Darneille, Vice Chair; Hasegawa, Vice Chair; Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Bailey, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Dammeier, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Orcutt, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Carlyle, Chandler, Cody, Dickerson, Haigh, Haler, Hinkle, Hudgins, Hunt, Kagi, Kenney, Ormsby, Parker, Pettigrew, Ross, Schmick, Seaquist, Springer, Sullivan and Wilcox.

Staff: Jeff Olsen (786-7175).

Background:

Property Taxes.

Property taxes are imposed by state and local governments. The county assessor determines the assessed value for each property. The county assessor also calculates the tax rate necessary to raise the correct amount of property taxes for each taxing district. The assessor calculates the rate so the individual district rate limit, the district revenue limit, and the aggregate rate limits are all satisfied. The property tax bill for an individual property is determined by multiplying the assessed value of the property by the tax rate for each taxing district in which the property is located.

Current Use Programs.

Property that meets certain conditions may have property taxes determined on current use values rather than market values. There are four categories of lands that may be classified and assessed on current use. Three categories are covered in the Open Space Taxation Act (Act): open space lands, farm and agriculture lands, and timber lands. The fourth category, designated forest land, is in chapter 84.33 RCW, timber and forest lands.

Compensating Taxes.

When land is designated as forest land it is generally assessed at a lower value resulting in lower taxes. When land is removed from designation as forest land, back taxes must be paid, unless certain exceptions are met. The amount of the back tax owed for designated forest land is specified by formula and is equal to the tax benefit in the most recent year multiplied by the number of years in the current use classification, but not more than nine.

Exceptions to the Payment of Compensating Taxes.

The compensating tax is not imposed if the removal is from one of the following actions:

Additionally, in counties with populations greater than 600,000, an exception to the payment of back taxes is allowed for a sale or transfer to a governmental entity, nonprofit historic preservation, or nonprofit nature conservancy corporation for the purpose of conserving open space. This exception is similar to the third exception above for acquisition of conservation property, but contains a broader exception, similar to the exception in the open space classification.

The Act has a list of exceptions that are similar to the exceptions for designated forest land. However, the following exceptions are not parallel including:

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Summary of Substitute Bill:

The exception for the payment of back taxes on designated forest land when the transfer of property interests is for public use and enjoyment in a county with a population of more than 600,000 inhabitants is changed to include transfers in a county west of the crest of the Cascade Mountains. In addition, the exception for removals of land that has been transferred from designated forest land to open space and then removed from the open space classification under one of the authorized exceptions is expanded from a county with a population of more than 600,000 inhabitants to a county west of the crest of the Cascade Mountains.

Additional exceptions from payment of forest land compensating tax are added including:

Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:

The substitute bill limits the exception for payment of back taxes on designated forest land sold or transferred for the purpose of conserving open space land to include counties west of the crest of the Cascade Mountains, rather than statewide. The substitute bill expands the exception for removals of land that has been transferred from designated forest land to open space and then removed from the open space program under one of the authorized exceptions from a county with a population of more than 600,000 inhabitants to a county west of the crest of the Cascade Mountains.

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) The purpose of the bill is to address inconsistencies between the open space land and the designated forest land exceptions for the payment of compensating taxes. Exceptions include things that happen to a landowner, such as the taking of the land through eminent domain, or if the transfer of land is for a useful purpose, such as transferring the land to a church. The exceptions have changed over time, and are not the same for each category of land. The harmonizing of the compensating tax between the open space and the designated forest land would help bring some consistency to the current use program. There have been problems in the past with the interpretation of the language by the Department of Revenue, and it would be helpful to get their interpretation of the changes. Consistency among the counties in implementing the program would also be useful.

A project in Kitsap County involving 7,000 acres would benefit from the changes in the proposed bill. This is an important economic tool to encourage economic development.

(Opposed) None.

Persons Testifying: Representative Hansen, prime sponsor; John Ehrenreich, Washington Forest Protection Association; Bill Robinson, The Nature Conservancy; Tom McBride, Kitsap County; and Leda Chahim, Forterra.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.