HOUSE BILL REPORT

SSB 5445

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Reported by House Committee On:

Health Care & Wellness

Title: An act relating to the creation of a health benefit exchange.

Brief Description: Establishing a health benefit exchange.

Sponsors: Senate Committee on Health & Long-Term Care (originally sponsored by Senators Keiser, Pflug, White, Conway and Kline; by request of Governor Gregoire).

Brief History:

Committee Activity:

Health Care & Wellness: 3/17/11, 3/23/11 [DPA].

Brief Summary of Substitute Bill

(As Amended by House)

  • Establishes a Health Benefit Exchange, and a Health Benefit Exchange Board, by July 1, 2012.

  • Requires the Health Care Authority, in collaboration with the Joint Select Committee on Health Care Reform, to apply for and implement federal grants and to provide options to the Legislature for establishing an exchange.

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH CARE & WELLNESS

Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Cody, Chair; Jinkins, Vice Chair; Schmick, Ranking Minority Member; Hinkle, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Clibborn, Green, Kelley, Moeller and Van De Wege.

Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 2 members: Representatives Bailey and Harris.

Staff: Jim Morishima (786-7191).

Background:

Health Benefit Exchanges.

The federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) requires every state to establish an "American Health Benefit Exchange" (Exchange) no later than January 1, 2014. The Exchange must serve both small groups (in a so-called SHOP Exchange) and individuals and must be self-sustaining by January 1, 2015. If a state chooses not to establish an Exchange, the federal government will operate an Exchange either directly or through an agreement with a nonprofit entity.

Under the PPACA, an Exchange's functions include:

Health plans in the Exchange will be available in four different levels based on the percentage of costs the plan will pay: Bronze (60 percent), Silver (70 percent), Gold (80 percent), and Platinum (90 percent).

In order to be qualified to sell insurance in an Exchange, a carrier must:

Premium subsidies on a sliding scale will be available in the Exchange for persons between 133 percent and 400 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) in the form of advanceable, refundable tax credits. Depending on a person's income level, the subsidies will ensure that the premiums the person pays will be no greater than a certain percentage of the person's income: under 133 percent FPL = 2 percent of income; 133-149 percent FPL = 3-4 percent of income; 150-199 percent FPL = 4-6.3 percent of income; 200-249 percent FPL = 6.3-8.05 percent of income; 250-299 percent FPL = 8.05-9.5 percent of income; and 300-399 percent FPL = 9.5 percent of income.

The PPACA provides states with some flexibility when implementing the Exchanges. For example:

State Planning Activities.

In 2010 there was a variety of planning activities relating to Exchanges. For example, the Legislature established the Joint Select Committee on Health Reform Implementation, which established an advisory group to consider issues relating to establishing an Exchange. The Office of the Insurance Commissioner established a Realization Committee, which also made recommendations relating to an Exchange. Finally, the Health Care Authority (HCA) received a planning grant, which it used, in part, to develop several issue briefs relating to Exchanges.

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Summary of Amended Bill:

Establishing an Exchange.

The state must establish, by statute, an Exchange to begin operations no later than January 1, 2014. The Exchange is intended to:

The Exchange must be established no later than July 1, 2012, as a quasi-governmental, public-private partnership with a Health Benefit Exchange Board (Board) the membership of which will be appointed by the Governor by July 1, 2012. The membership of the Board must be as follows:

The powers and duties of the Exchange and the Board are limited to those necessary to apply for and administer grants, establish information technology infrastructure, and other administrative functions necessary to begin operating the Exchange by January 1, 2014. Neither the Exchange nor the Board may begin operating the Exchange or make substantive decisions regarding the Exchange unless specifically authorized to do so by statute.

Board members may not be employed by, a consultant to, a member of the board of directors of, or otherwise a representative of or a lobbyist for an entity in the business of, or potentially in the business of, selling items or services of significant value to the Exchange.

The Board must establish an advisory committee to allow for the views of the health care industry and other stakeholders. The Board may establish technical advisory committees and to consult with experts. In recognition of the government-to-government relationship between the state and the federally recognized Indian tribes, the Board must consult with the American Indian Health Commission on an ongoing basis.

Members of the Board are immune from civil or criminal liability for actions taken, or not taken, in the performance of their official duties, as long as they are acting in good faith. However, this immunity does not prohibit legal actions to enforce the Board's statutory or contractual duties or obligations.

Neither the Exchange nor the Board are officially established until all the members of the Board are appointed. Prior to the establishment of the Exchange, the HCA has the powers and duties of the Exchange and the Board.

Federal Grants.

The HCA must apply for establishment and planning grants under the PPACA in collaboration with the Joint Select Committee on Health Care Reform Implementation. Whenever possible, the grant applications must allow for using grant funds to partially fund the activities of the Joint Select Committee on Health Care Reform Implementation. The HCA, in collaboration with the Joint Select Committee on Health Care Reform Implementation, must implement any grants received by the federal government.

Exchange Options.

By January 1, 2012, the HCA, in collaboration with the Joint Select Committee on Health Reform Implementation, must develop a broad range of options for establishing and implementing a state-administered Exchange. The options must include recommendations on:

In collaboration with the Joint Select Committee on Health Reform Implementation, the HCA must develop a work plan for the development of the options in discrete, prioritized stages.

Consultation With Other Entities.

The HCA must consult with the Insurance Commissioner, the Joint Select Committee on Health Reform Implementation, and stakeholders when carrying out its responsibilities, including: consumers; individuals and entities with experience facilitating enrollment in health insurance coverage; representatives of small businesses, employees of small businesses, and self-employed individuals; advocates for enrolling hard-to-reach populations and populations enrolled in publicly subsidized health programs; health care providers and facilities; publicly subsidized health care programs; and members of the American Academy of Actuaries. The HCA may enter into information sharing agreements with federal and state agencies and interdepartmental agreements with other state agencies. The HCA must also provide staff and resources, manage grant and other funds, and expend appropriated funds.

Transfer of Powers and Duties to the Exchange and the Board.

Once the Exchange and the Board are officially established, the powers and duties delegated to the HCA are transferred to the Exchange and the Board.

Amended Bill Compared to Substitute Bill:

The amended bill:

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available. New fiscal note requested on March 24, 2011.

Effective Date of Amended Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) The date upon which the state must operate an Exchange is rapidly approaching. The goal of this bill is to put the infrastructure of the Exchange in place. The bill reflects a bi-partisan consensus that the state will establish its own Exchange. The timing of establishing the Board will be beneficial toward the receipt of federal funds, which is predicated upon a legal structure and a defined role for the Exchange. Decisions about operating the Exchange would be reflected in the collaborative process with the Legislature and in any legislation that would be passed next year. The Exchange should drive cost reductions, not cost containment. Health spending is rising rapidly in the United States, especially compared to other countries. Costs are higher in the United States too and this country is not getting the value for its money. There should be stronger conflict of interest language in this bill; the conflict of interest provisions in this bill and the House version should be combined. The Insurance Commissioner should be more involved in this process. The Board should be established later this year, as opposed to next year. Consumer literacy should be addressed; it is the best predictor of health outcomes. Another consumer representative and a labor representative should be added to the Board. This legislation should require the establishment of an advisory committee. The BHO should be pursued; the BHO should be combined with Medicaid. Consumers should be able to select options based on cultural competency and access. Low-income populations should be able to access care seamlessly and be provided universal access. The Exchange should have a "no wrong door" policy. The Exchange will be a critical piece for older people who are ineligible for Medicare.

(In support with concerns) This legislation should establish an Exchange that is an active purchaser and administratively operates for both the individual and small group markets. The state should move forward on issues that have general consensus; e.g., operating a single exchange and aggregating funds. The Exchange should serve as a "single door" for people accessing the health care system. This legislation should require the establishment of an advisory committee. The Board should be established later this year, as opposed to next year.

(In support with amendment) The House version of this bill is preferable to this one; it represents a thoughtful, deliberate, bi-partisan approach with the Joint Select Committee on Health Care Reform Implementation in the lead. The conflict of interest provisions in this bill are too restrictive.

(With concerns) The House version of this bill is preferable to this one.

(Opposed) The House version of this bill is preferable to this one; the language in the House version was worked out with stakeholders. The Board should not move forward until the Legislature has approved its structure.

Persons Testifying: (In support) Senator Keiser, prime sponsor; Jonathon Seib, Governor's Office; Sean Corry, Realization Committee; Rud Browne, Ryzex Inc. and Realization Committee; Sofia Aragon, Washington State Nurses Association; Misha Werschkul, Service Employees International Union 775 NW; Pamela Crone, Community Health Network of Washington; and Ingrid McDonald, Association for the Advancement of Retired Persons.

(In support with concerns) Jennifer Allen, Healthy Washington Coalition.

(In support with amendment) Dave Knutson, United HealthCare.

(With concerns) Donna Steward, Association of Washington Business; and Chris Bandoli, Regence BlueShield.

(Opposed) Patrick Connor, National Federation of Independent Business; and Scott Dahlman, Washington Farm Bureau.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.