HOUSE BILL REPORT
SB 5500
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent. |
As Reported by House Committee On:
State Government & Tribal Affairs
Title: An act relating to the rule-making process for state economic policy.
Brief Description: Concerning the rule-making process for state economic policy.
Sponsors: Senators Baumgartner, Chase, Kastama, Zarelli, Schoesler, Shin, Holmquist Newbry, Delvin, Parlette, Kilmer and Roach.
Brief History:
Committee Activity:
State Government & Tribal Affairs: 3/9/11, 3/24/11 [DP].
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STATE GOVERNMENT & TRIBAL AFFAIRS |
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 10 members: Representatives Hunt, Chair; Appleton, Vice Chair; Taylor, Ranking Minority Member; Overstreet, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Alexander, Condotta, Darneille, Hurst, McCoy and Miloscia.
Minority Report: Without recommendation. Signed by 1 member: Representative Dunshee.
Staff: Marsha Reilly (786-7135).
Background:
The Regulatory Fairness Act was enacted in 1994 to reduce the disproportionate impact of state administrative rules on small business. As part of the rule-making process, an agency must prepare a small business economic impact statement (SBEIS) if:
the rule would impose more than minor costs on businesses in an industry; or
the Joint Administrative Rules Review Committee requests the agency to do so.
As part of the SBEIS, an agency must analyze the compliance costs of the rule including lost revenue or sales, and increased labor, equipment, supply, or administrative costs. The SBEIS must determine whether the rule has a disproportionate impact on small businesses. If the rule has such an impact, the agency must, where legal and feasible, reduce the costs on small businesses. Such steps may include:
reduce, modify, or eliminate substantive regulatory requirements;
simplify, reduce, or eliminate recordkeeping and reporting requirements;
reduce the frequency of inspections;
delay compliance timetables;
reduce or modify fine schedules for noncompliance; or
any other mitigation techniques.
A SBEIS must also include a description of the reporting, recordkeeping, and other compliance requirements of the proposed rule, and the kinds of professional services that a small business is likely to need in order to comply with the rule. The agency must analyze the costs of compliance, including costs of equipment, supplies, labor, and increased administrative costs, and must consider whether compliance will cause businesses to lose sales or revenue.
An agency must include in the SBEIS the steps taken to reduce costs and involve small businesses in the development of the rule. It also must include a list of industries required to comply with the rule.
Whenever a proposed rule requires a SBEIS, the agency must provide notice to small businesses through direct notification of known interested small businesses or trade organizations affected by the proposed rule, or provide information of the proposed rule-making to publications likely to be obtained by the affected small businesses.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Summary of Bill:
The methods listed to reduce costs on small businesses are changed from permissible to mandatory. Agencies must consider mitigation techniques suggested by small businesses or small business advocates. Notice requirements for proposed rules with a SBEIS include posting the information on the agency's website.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) The bill addresses stakeholder input in the process and requires that information about the rule-making process be placed on the agency website. It allows small businesses to have greater input regarding burdensome requirements and finding a less costly way to address a rule. It expands the information available to the public and provides notice of rules that may affect businesses. The bill passed the Senate with a unanimous vote. Small businesses need to be informed about proposed rules, and mitigating impacts to those rules must be considered.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Carl Gipson, Washington Policy Center; Patrick Connor, National Federation of Independent Business; and Gary Smith, Independent Business Association.
Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.