HOUSE BILL REPORT

SSB 5627

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Passed House:

February 27, 2012

Title: An act relating to service members' civil relief.

Brief Description: Concerning service members' civil relief.

Sponsors: Senate Committee on Judiciary (originally sponsored by Senators Hobbs, Murray, Kilmer and Shin; by request of Washington State Bar Association).

Brief History:

Committee Activity:

Judiciary: 2/9/12, 2/20/12 [DP].

Floor Activity:

Passed House: 2/27/12, 96-0.

Brief Summary of Substitute Bill

  • Amends the Washington Service Members' Civil Relief Act to apply to National Guard members who are under a call to service authorized by the Governor for a period of more than 30 consecutive days.

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY

Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 12 members: Representatives Pedersen, Chair; Goodman, Vice Chair; Rodne, Ranking Minority Member; Shea, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Chandler, Hansen, Kirby, Klippert, Nealey, Orwall, Rivers and Roberts.

Staff: Edie Adams (786-7180).

Background:

The Washington Service Members' Civil Relief Act (SCRA) was enacted in 2005. The SCRA contains certain rights for service members and their dependents whose financial and legal obligations may be adversely impacted by active military duty. The main provisions of the SCRA provide rights to a service member and dependents in civil proceedings to protect them from default judgments and to allow them to stay in civil proceedings until after the end of active military service. The SCRA also contains provisions restricting contract fines and penalties, restructuring interest rates on certain business loans, and tolling statutes of limitations during military service periods. The SCRA was modeled on the portions of the federal Service Members' Civil Relief Act relating to default judgments and stays of civil proceedings.

The SCRA applies to Washington residents who are members of the National Guard or a military reserve component and who are under a call to active service authorized by the President or the Secretary of the Department of Defense for a period of more than 30 consecutive days. The SCRA applies also to certain dependents of covered service members. Eligible dependents are the spouse, or registered domestic partner, and children, and any person for whom the service member provided more than one-half of the person's support for the six months prior to applying for relief under the SCRA.

The Governor is authorized to call National Guard members to active duty within the state for any of a number of reasons. Those reasons are established by statute and include when any of the following events occur or are in imminent danger of occurring: war, insurrection, rebellion, invasion, tumult, or riot; a mob or organized body acting by force to commit a felony; the failure of local authorities to preserve law and order; public disaster; or when required for the public health, safety, or welfare.

Summary of Bill:

The SCRA is amended to apply to National Guard members who are under a call to service authorized by the Governor for a period of more than 30 consecutive days.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Not requested.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) The bill will provide the same protection for National Guard members called up for state emergency service as provided to National Guard and reserve members who are called to service by the President. National Guard members called to state active duty status are currently not covered under the federal or state act. The Governor calls up the National Guard to active duty in times of emergency to protect our citizens. They can be called up for an extended period of time and are often earning far less than their civilian pay while on duty. They face the same difficulties as active duty members in responding to legal and other matters when they are called up to active duty and they should receive the same protections.

(Opposed) None.

Persons Testifying: Senator Hobbs, prime sponsor; Kathryn Leathers and Kenyon Luce, Washington State Bar Association; and Ted Wicorek, Veterans Legislative Coalition.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.