SENATE BILL REPORT

SB 5626

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As of Second Reading

Title: An act relating to authorizing the creation of cultural access authorities.

Brief Description: Concerning cultural access authorities.

Sponsors: Senators Fraser, Kohl-Welles and Chase.

Brief History:

Committee Activity: Labor, Commerce & Consumer Protection: 2/14/11, 2/17/11 [DPS-WM, DNP].

SENATE COMMITTEE ON LABOR, COMMERCE & CONSUMER PROTECTION

Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5626 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass and be referred to Committee on Ways & Means.

Signed by Senators Kohl-Welles, Chair; Conway, Vice Chair; Keiser and Kline.

Minority Report: Do not pass.

Signed by Senators Holmquist Newbry, Ranking Minority Member; King, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Hewitt.

Staff: Mac Nicholson (786-7445)

Background: A variety of special purpose districts may be created by counties, cities, or towns to provide specific public facilities or services which are generally financed through taxes or assessments. Examples of special purpose districts include school districts, fire protection districts, public utility districts, port districts, irrigation districts, mosquito control districts, and public facilities districts.

Summary of Bill: An education and arts access program is created, under which education and arts cultural access authorities can secure funding for public school education and arts access programs.

Creation and Governance. Any county may create an education and arts cultural access authority (authority) by resolution of the county. A group of contiguous counties may create an authority by entering into an interlocal agreement that is approved by each county. Single county authorities are governed by a five-member board, appointed by the county. If the authority has a population greater than 1.5 million, three board members are appointed by the county, and one is appointed from each of the two largest cities in the county. Multi-county authorities are governed as provided in the interlocal agreements subject to the following provisions: authorities with four or fewer counties must have an odd numbered board with nine or fewer members; authorities with more than four counties must have no more than an eleven member board; and the interlocal agreement must provide for the reduction or expansion of an authority's service area based on the results of tax authorization votes. Special governance rules apply to multi-county authorities with an aggregate population greater than 2.5 million.

An authority is a municipal corporation, political subdivision, independent taxing authority, and a taxing district and possesses all the usual powers of a corporation for public purposes.

Authority board members may receive $50 per day for attending meetings on behalf of the authority, up to $3,000 per year. An authority board must adopt procedures for expense reimbursement, hire employees and establish wages and benefits, and adopt ethics policies consistent with applicable law and applicable best practices for board members, officers, and employees. An authority board may appoint an advisory council with representation from business, education, and cultural communities. Authority board members and employees are not personally liable for acts done, or omitted, in good faith while performing authority duties.

Single county authorities with a population less than 1.5 million and multi-county authorities with a population less than 2.5 million may contract with the State Arts Commission for consulting, management, or administrative services. A county participating in an authority may contract with the State Arts Commission to function as its designated public agency.

Start-up Funding. A county or counties creating an authority may advance to the authority up to $1 million annually for up to three years for administrative costs, including the cost of informing the public about the formation of the authority, how it is proposed to be funded, and the public benefits to be realized if it is successful. Counties seeking to create an authority are not authorized under the legislation to prepare and distribute information to the general public for the purpose of influencing the outcome of an authority election. Funds advanced to the authority must be repaid with interest if approved by the voters. An authority that has not secured voter approval of either the sales and use or property tax within three years must be dissolved, and any advanced funds that were expended need not be repaid.

On-going Funding. Authorities are funded by either a voter approved sales and use tax or a voter approved property tax. In either case, the ballot proposition must be submitted to the voters at a special election held after June 30, 2013, and the tax must be re-authorized every seven years. A majority of the voters in each county must approve the ballot proposition in order for the county to be included in the authority. The sales and use tax cannot exceed one-tenth of 1 percent and is in addition to any other taxes authorized by law. The total dollar amount to be collected in the first year of the regular property tax levy must be set forth in the ballot proposition, and cannot exceed an amount equal to one-tenth of the total taxable retail sales and taxable uses in the participating counties. Any property tax levied is subject to the 1-percent limit, and will be included as a first priority junior taxing district for the purposes of property tax pro-rationing.

Distribution of Funds. For single county authorities with a service area population greater than 1.5 million and multi-county authorities with a service area population greater than 2.5 million, revenue is to be used as follows:

For all other authorities, revenue must be allocated as follows:

Projects of Regional Benefit. Projects of regional benefit may include regional cultural public information and promotional activities, support for new cultural organizations, and support for specific projects or organizations working to expand access to cultural activities by underserved populations. Eligibility guidelines and criteria for funding will be established by the authority board.

Public School Cultural Access Program. A public school cultural access program must:

Regional Organizations. A regional organization is a cultural organization that owns, operates, or supports cultural facilities that widely benefit and are broadly attended by the public. In order to receive funding under the legislation, a regional organization must:

Funds available for regional organizations must be distributed based on an annual ranking using the combined size of their average annual revenues and attendance over the three preceding years. No organization may receive funds in excess of 15 percent of its average annual revenues. Funds distributed to regional organizations must be used to support cultural and educational activities, programs and initiatives, public benefits and communications, and basic operations.

Designated Entities. A designated entity is the entity designated by the county and may be a public agency, including the State Arts Commission, or a nonprofit corporation that is not a cultural organization.

Cultural Organization. A cultural organization is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit that has advancement and preservation of science or arts as its primary purpose.

Public Agencies. A public agency can use up to 8 percent of the amount received for administrative costs, the remainder must be used to fund community-based organizations. Community-based organizations are those that focus their activities and are supported or patronized within a local community. Public agencies must adopt eligibility guidelines, award criteria, and adopt procedures for conducting annual competitive award processes. Funds awarded to community-based organizations may be used to support cultural and educational activities, public benefits, basic operations, and capital expenditures and acquisitions including the acquisition of property and equipment.

Public Benefits. All cultural organizations receiving funding must provide discernible public benefits. Authorities must identify a range of public benefits that cultural organizations may provide, including (1) access to facilities, programs and services on a reduced or free basis; (2) providing educational programs and experiences in schools and other venues; (3) broadening cultural programs for the enlightenment and entertainment of the public; and (4) increasing organizational capacity.

EFFECT OF CHANGES MADE BY LABOR, COMMERCE & CONSUMER PROTECTION COMMITTEE (Recommended Substitute): The substitute changes the name from cultural access authorities to education and arts cultural access authorities which are authorized under the education and arts access program.

Provisions are added in the substitute to provide that the ballot propositions authorizing a tax must pass in each county in a multi-county authority, and that the area of the authority must be revised to include only those counties where the proposition passes. The substitute provides that elections on the ballot proposition to impose the tax can occur only after June 30, 2013. The substitute also clarifies responsibilities regarding collection and distribution of the sales and use and property taxes.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.

Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony on Original Bill:

Testimony From 2011 Regular Session.

PRO: Access to cultural organizations needs to be increased. Expenditures are made across the community when individuals visit cultural organizations. The value of a cultural experience has increased during the economic downturn, and visiting cultural organizations builds communities. Attendance at cultural organizations is steady, but revenues have been falling. Arts and science centers make a profound difference in the lives of young people, and help people understand the world. Improved access is a powerful tool. This legislation will help arts and science organizations increase their reach, particularly to school children.

Persons Testifying:

Persons Testifying From 2011 Regular Session.

PRO: Maggie Walker, Seattle Art Museum, Museum of History and Industry, Prosperity Partnership; Dwight Gee, Arts Fund; Bryce Seidl, Pacific Science Center; Tim Close, Museum of Glass; Karen Mobley, Community Arts Volunteer; Becky Bogard, Prosperity Partnership.