SENATE BILL REPORT

SB 5971

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Reported by Senate Committee On:

Human Services & Corrections, February 2, 2012

Title: An act relating to mandatory reporting of child abuse or neglect by supervised persons.

Brief Description: Modifying requirements for certain mandatory reporters of child abuse and neglect.

Sponsors: Senators Carrell, Stevens and Swecker.

Brief History:

Committee Activity: Human Services & Corrections: 1/13/12, 2/02/12 [DPS].

SENATE COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES & CORRECTIONS

Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5971 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.

Signed by Senators Hargrove, Chair; Regala, Vice Chair; Stevens, Ranking Minority Member; Carrell, Harper, McAuliffe and Padden.

Staff: Jennifer Strus (786-7316)

Background: When the following persons have reasonable cause to believe that a child has suffered abuse or neglect, they must report the incident to either law enforcement or the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS): physician; county coroner; law enforcement officer; professional school personnel; registered or licensed nurse; social service counselor; psychologist; pharmacist; Department of Early Learning employee; licensed or certified child care provider; juvenile probation officer; placement and liaison specialist; responsible living skills program staff; DSHS employees; HOPE center staff; state family and children’s ombudsman employee, or any volunteer in the ombudsman’s office.

The reporting requirement also applies to a variety of other persons in specific situations:

Persons mandated to report suspected child abuse or neglect must do so at the first opportunity but in no case longer than 48 hours after there is reasonable cause to believe the child has suffered abuse or neglect.

Summary of Bill: The bill as referred to committee not considered.

Summary of Bill (Recommended Substitute): For purposes of the mandated reporting situation involving persons in their official supervisory capacity, organization or entity is defined to include a sole proprietor, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, trust, association, financial institution, governmental entity other than the federal government, and any other individual or group engaged in a trade, occupation, enterprise, governmental function, charitable function, or similar activity in this state, however organized and whether organized to operate at a profit.

Also for purposes of this mandated reporting situation, reasonable cause is defined to mean a person that witnessed or received a credible written or oral report alleging abuse, including sexual contact, or neglect of a child by another over whom the person regularly exercises supervisory authority. The term sexual contact has the same meaning as in RCW 9A.44.010.

EFFECT OF CHANGES MADE BY HUMAN SERVICES & CORRECTIONS COMMITTEE (Recommended Substitute as Passed Committee): Clarified the definition of reasonable cause and sexual contact. Added charitable organizations to the list of organizations covered by the provisions governing mandated reporting of child abuse or neglect by supervisors in certain situations.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect on October 1, 2012.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony as Heard in Committee: OTHER: The change requiring the mandated reporters to only report to law enforcement could lead to confusion for mandated reporters about who they report to and could delay involvement of DSHS in cases of abuse or neglect that do not rise to the level of a crime but still implicate child safety. It is not clear whether the definition of organization or entity that is added to the bill was intended to apply to more organizations or whether it was intended to narrow the focus of the state. The definition seems to focus on commercial and governmental entities, and leave out nonprofit groups that may be organized to achieve a charitable or social goal, rather than to engage in a trade or enterprise. The definition of sexual misconduct raises concerns because its terms can be interpreted in more than one way and also because the definitions are inconsistent with other statutory definitions. In particular, the use of the phrase grooming behavior is a broad term that is not defined and as a result could be difficult to prove.

Persons Testifying: OTHER: Sheila Huber, Attorney General’s Office; Lonnie Johns-Brown, WA Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs.