BILL REQ. #:  Z-0221.1 



_____________________________________________ 

HOUSE BILL 1033
_____________________________________________
State of Washington62nd Legislature2011 Regular Session

By Representatives Eddy, Springer, Armstrong, Walsh, Takko, Parker, Appleton, Blake, Smith, Bailey, McCune, Nealey, Short, Fagan, and Moeller; by request of Attorney General

Prefiled 12/15/10. Read first time 01/10/11.   Referred to Committee on State Government & Tribal Affairs.



     AN ACT Relating to clarifying the statute of limitations for any court action brought under RCW 42.56.550; reenacting and amending RCW 42.56.550; and creating a new section.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1   This act clarifies the legislature's intent that the statute of limitations for any action brought under RCW 42.56.550 is one year from the date that an agency claims an exemption, provides the records responsive to a request, or indicates that there are no responsive records, whichever occurs last. Consequently, if an agency produces records on a partial or installment basis, the statute of limitations will not begin to run until the last record is provided on that basis or an exemption is claimed, whichever is later. Likewise, if the agency provides a single response either by claiming an exemption, producing records, or indicating no responsive records have been located, an action must be filed within one year of the date of that response.

Sec. 2   RCW 42.56.550 and 2005 c 483 s 5 and 2005 c 274 s 288 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:
     (1) Upon the motion of any person having been denied an opportunity to inspect or copy a public record by an agency, the superior court in the county in which a record is maintained may require the responsible agency to show cause why it has refused to allow inspection or copying of a specific public record or class of records. The burden of proof shall be on the agency to establish that refusal to permit public inspection and copying is in accordance with a statute that exempts or prohibits disclosure in whole or in part of specific information or records.
     (2) Upon the motion of any person who believes that an agency has not made a reasonable estimate of the time that the agency requires to respond to a public record request, the superior court in the county in which a record is maintained may require the responsible agency to show that the estimate it provided is reasonable. The burden of proof shall be on the agency to show that the estimate it provided is reasonable.
     (3) Judicial review of all agency actions taken or challenged under RCW 42.56.030 through 42.56.520 shall be de novo. Courts shall take into account the policy of this chapter that free and open examination of public records is in the public interest, even though such examination may cause inconvenience or embarrassment to public officials or others. Courts may examine any record in camera in any proceeding brought under this section. The court may conduct a hearing based solely on affidavits.
     (4) Any person who prevails against an agency in any action in the courts seeking the right to inspect or copy any public record or the right to receive a response to a public record request within a reasonable amount of time shall be awarded all costs, including reasonable attorney fees, incurred in connection with such legal action. In addition, it shall be within the discretion of the court to award such person an amount not less than five dollars and not to exceed one hundred dollars for each day that he or she was denied the right to inspect or copy said public record.
     (5) For actions under this section against counties, the venue provisions of RCW 36.01.050 apply.
     (6) Actions under this section must be filed within one year of the agency's claim of exemption ((or the)), last production of a record ((on a partial or installment basis)), or response indicating no responsive records have been located, whichever occurs last.

--- END ---