BILL REQ. #: H-3830.1
State of Washington | 62nd Legislature | 2012 Regular Session |
Read first time 01/25/12. Referred to Committee on Environment.
AN ACT Relating to creating a review process to determine whether a proposed electric generation project or conservation resource qualifies to meet a target under RCW 19.285.040; and adding a new section to chapter 19.285 RCW.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 A new section is added to chapter 19.285 RCW
to read as follows:
(1) When requested by a qualifying utility that is not investor-owned or by persons proposing electric generation or conservation
resource projects, the Washington State University extension energy
program is authorized to and shall provide analysis and an advisory
opinion on whether a proposed electric generation project or
conservation resource qualifies to meet a target under RCW 19.285.040.
The advisory opinion must include a legal analysis. When forming its
advisory opinion, the energy program must consult with the technical
and legal staff of the department of commerce. Other experts may also
be consulted as needed.
(2) Qualifying utilities that are not investor-owned and persons
proposing electric generation or conservation resource projects may
apply for an advisory opinion from the Washington State University
extension energy program. The application must be in writing and must
include information that accurately describes the proposed project or
resource. Within ninety days of receiving an application, the energy
program must issue a signed advisory opinion on whether the proposed
project or resource qualifies to meet a target under RCW 19.285.040.
The governing body of the applicant must either adopt or reject the
advisory opinion after public notice and hearing. An advisory opinion
adopted by the governing body under this subsection is dispositive
regarding the eligibility of the proposed project or resource under RCW
19.285.040 and for the purposes of RCW 19.285.060, but only if: (a)
The advisory opinion affirmatively qualified the project or resource;
and (b) the project or resource is built or acquired as proposed.
(3) The Washington State University extension energy program may
require an applicant to pay an application fee to cover the cost of
reviewing the project and preparing an advisory opinion.
(4) Nothing in this section is intended to preempt the authority of
any governing body of utilities that are not investor-owned from making
a determination, independent of the process in subsection (2) of this
section, on whether a proposed electric generation project or
conservation resource may qualify to meet a target under RCW
19.285.040.