BILL REQ. #:  S-0307.3 



_____________________________________________ 

SENATE BILL 5283
_____________________________________________
State of Washington62nd Legislature2011 Regular Session

By Senators Hobbs, Benton, Schoesler, Honeyford, Zarelli, Prentice, and Shin

Read first time 01/20/11.   Referred to Committee on Financial Institutions, Housing & Insurance.



     AN ACT Relating to cost-saving measures and allocation of vouchers in awarding resources for low-income housing; amending RCW 36.22.178, 36.22.179, 36.22.1791, 43.185.020, and 43.185.050; adding a new section to chapter 43.185 RCW; and adding new sections to chapter 36.01 RCW.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

Sec. 1   RCW 36.22.178 and 2007 c 427 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
     The surcharge provided for in this section shall be named the affordable housing for all surcharge.
     (1) Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, a surcharge of ten dollars per instrument shall be charged by the county auditor for each document recorded, which will be in addition to any other charge authorized by law. The county may retain up to five percent of these funds collected solely for the collection, administration, and local distribution of these funds. Of the remaining funds, forty percent of the revenue generated through this surcharge will be transmitted monthly to the state treasurer who will deposit the funds into the affordable housing for all account created in RCW 43.185C.190. The department of ((community, trade, and economic development)) commerce must use these funds to provide housing and shelter for extremely low-income households, including ((but not limited to)) using twenty-six percent of the funds for rental vouchers as long as a majority of the dwelling units occupied by the tenants using these vouchers are privately owned units that are not operating under any program licensed by the state of Washington, and the remaining funds used for grants for building operation and maintenance costs of housing projects or units within housing projects that are affordable to extremely low-income households with incomes at or below thirty percent of the area median income, and that require a supplement to rent income to cover ongoing operating expenses.
     (2) All of the remaining funds generated by this surcharge will be retained by the county and be deposited into a fund that must be used by the county and its cities and towns for eligible housing activities as described in this subsection that serve very low-income households with incomes at or below fifty percent of the area median income. The portion of the surcharge retained by a county shall be allocated to eligible housing activities that serve extremely low and very low-income households in the county and the cities within a county according to an interlocal agreement between the county and the cities within the county consistent with countywide and local housing needs and policies. A priority must be given to eligible housing activities that serve extremely low-income households with incomes at or below thirty percent of the area median income. Eligible housing activities to be funded by these county funds are limited ((to)) as follows:
     (a) A minimum of twenty-six percent of funds received must be (i) allocated for rental vouchers for housing units that are affordable to very low-income households with incomes at or below fifty percent of the area median income, and (ii) administered by a local public housing authority or other local organization that has an existing rental assistance voucher program, which provides vouchers for as long as necessary, as opposed to providing vouchers for a limited period of time, in order to provide renters with consistency and an opportunity to live where they desire. The rental vouchers must be payable to the landlord, including vouchers for first and last month's rent and security and other required deposits, except pet deposits, required of all other new tenants. The administering authority or organization must ensure that a majority of the dwelling units occupied by tenants using these vouchers are privately owned units that are not operating under any program licensed by the state of Washington;
     (b) The remaining funds may be used for:
     (i)
Acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of housing projects or units within housing projects that are affordable to very low-income households with incomes at or below fifty percent of the area median income, including units for homeownership, rental units, seasonal and permanent farm worker housing units, and single room occupancy units;
     (((b))) (ii) Supporting building operation and maintenance costs of housing projects or units within housing projects eligible to receive housing trust funds, that are affordable to very low-income households with incomes at or below fifty percent of the area median income, and that require a supplement to rent income to cover ongoing operating expenses((;
     (c) Rental assistance vouchers for housing units that are affordable to very low-income households with incomes at or below fifty percent of the area median income, to be administered by a local public housing authority or other local organization that has an existing rental assistance voucher program, consistent with or similar to the United States department of housing and urban development's section 8 rental assistance voucher program standards
)); and
     (((d))) (iii) Operating costs for emergency shelters and licensed overnight youth shelters.
     (3) The surcharge imposed in this section does not apply to assignments or substitutions of previously recorded deeds of trust.

Sec. 2   RCW 36.22.179 and 2009 c 462 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) In addition to the surcharge authorized in RCW 36.22.178, and except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, an additional surcharge of ten dollars shall be charged by the county auditor for each document recorded, which will be in addition to any other charge allowed by law. During the 2009-11 and 2011-13 biennia, the surcharge shall be thirty dollars. The funds collected pursuant to this section are to be distributed and used as follows:
     (a) The auditor shall retain two percent for collection of the fee, and of the remainder shall remit sixty percent to the county to be deposited into a fund that must be used by the county and its cities and towns to accomplish the purposes of chapter 484, Laws of 2005, (i) six percent of which may be used by the county for administrative costs related to its homeless housing plan, (ii) twenty-six percent of which must be used for rental vouchers to provide housing for homeless people as long as a majority of the dwelling units occupied by the tenants using these vouchers are privately owned units that are not operating under any program licensed by the state of Washington, and (iii) the remainder for programs which directly accomplish the goals of the county's local homeless housing plan, except that for each city in the county which elects as authorized in RCW 43.185C.080 to operate its own local homeless housing program, a percentage of the surcharge assessed under this section equal to the percentage of the city's local portion of the real estate excise tax collected by the county shall be transmitted at least quarterly to the city treasurer, without any deduction for county administrative costs, for use by the city for program costs which directly contribute to the goals of the city's local homeless housing plan; of the funds received by the city, it may use six percent for administrative costs for its homeless housing program.
     (b) The auditor shall remit the remaining funds to the state treasurer for deposit in the home security fund account. The department may use twelve and one-half percent of this amount for administration of the program established in RCW 43.185C.020, including the costs of creating the statewide homeless housing strategic plan, measuring performance, providing technical assistance to local governments, and managing the homeless housing grant program. Twenty-six percent of the remaining eighty-seven and one-half percent is to be used by the department to((:
     (i)
)) provide housing and shelter for homeless people through the use of rental vouchers. The remaining moneys must be used to (i) provide housing and shelter for homeless people including, but not limited to: Grants to operate, repair, and staff shelters; grants to operate transitional housing; ((partial payments for rental assistance;)) consolidated emergency assistance; overnight youth shelters; and emergency shelter assistance((;)), and (ii) fund the homeless housing grant program.
     (2) The surcharge imposed in this section does not apply to (a) assignments or substitutions of previously recorded deeds of trust, or (b) documents recording a birth, marriage, divorce, or death or any documents otherwise exempted from a recording fee under state law.

Sec. 3   RCW 36.22.1791 and 2007 c 427 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) In addition to the surcharges authorized in RCW 36.22.178 and 36.22.179, and except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, the county auditor shall charge an additional surcharge of eight dollars for each document recorded, which is in addition to any other charge allowed by law. The funds collected under this section are to be distributed and used as follows:
     (a) The auditor shall remit ninety percent to the county to be deposited into a fund, (i) six percent of which may be used by the county for administrative costs related to its homeless housing plan, (ii) twenty-six percent of which must be used for rental vouchers to provide housing for homeless people as long as a majority of the dwelling units occupied by the tenants using these vouchers are privately owned units that are not operating under any program licensed by the state of Washington, and (iii) the remainder for programs that directly accomplish the goals of the county's local homeless housing plan, except that for each city in the county that elects, as authorized in RCW 43.185C.080, to operate its own local homeless housing program, a percentage of the surcharge assessed under this section equal to the percentage of the city's local portion of the real estate excise tax collected by the county must be transmitted at least quarterly to the city treasurer for use by the city for program costs that directly contribute to the goals of the city's local homeless housing plan.
     (b) The auditor shall remit the remaining funds to the state treasurer for deposit in the home security fund account. The department ((may use the funds)) must use twenty-six percent of the funds for rental vouchers to provide housing for homeless people, and the remaining funds must be used:
     (i) F
or administering the program established in RCW 43.185C.020, including the costs of creating and updating the statewide homeless housing strategic plan, measuring performance, providing technical assistance to local governments, and managing the homeless housing grant program((. Remaining funds may also be used to:
     (i)
));
     (ii) To p
rovide housing and shelter for homeless people including, but not limited to: Grants to operate, repair, and staff shelters; grants to operate transitional housing; ((partial payments for rental assistance;)) consolidated emergency assistance; overnight youth shelters; and emergency shelter assistance; and
     (((ii))) (iii) To fund the homeless housing grant program.
     (2) The surcharge imposed in this section does not apply to assignments or substitutions of previously recorded deeds of trust.

Sec. 4   RCW 43.185.020 and 2009 c 565 s 37 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) "Department" means the department of commerce.
     (2) "Director" means the director of the department of commerce.
     (3) "Life-cycle cost analysis" means a method of calculating the total cost of an asset over its useful life by comparing the calculated present discounted values for rental income, development subsidies, forgiven property taxes, and residual land values converted to monthly equivalents to allow direct comparison to monthly voucher costs as described and used by the joint legislative audit and review committee in report 09-1, "Comparing Costs and Characteristics of Housing Assistance Programs."

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 5   A new section is added to chapter 43.185 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) The department and counties shall place a high priority on cost control and house the greatest number of qualified individuals within existing funds as part of the decision-making process in awarding state resources and funds by performing the following actions:
     (a) Develop per unit and per project measures to compare past award rounds to current award rounds with the goal of achieving cost reduction;
     (b) Document efforts by the housing trust fund to publicize cost reduction and cost-effectiveness strategies;
     (c) Track and report on costs of projects funded in each funding cycle;
     (d) Require developers to submit an audited final cost certification detailing total development costs and all sources of permanent financing. The analysis must include direct comparisons of differences in costs between developments applying for financing from state administered sources and vouchers;
     (e) For every dollar funded and expended, maximize the number of homeless and severely rent-burdened individuals housed and place qualified individuals in the most deconcentrated settings;
     (f) Move, as expediently as possible, waiting lists for housing. The waiting lists may not be controlled by endeavors to keep publicly funded housing projects fully populated;
     (g) Ensure that administrators of these funds make concentrated efforts to locate small private rental units under twenty units to place qualified individuals with vouchers as these units are typically not surveyed for vacancies and provide the greatest opportunity for localized housing; and
     (h) Ensure that voucher programs provide vouchers for as long as necessary, as opposed to providing vouchers for a limited period of time, in order to provide renters with consistency and an opportunity to live where they desire.
     (2) The administration of the cost-saving devices under this section and efforts to maximize the number of qualified individuals housed must be funded within existing program resources, including: The funds allocated for administrative costs; administrative costs for the homeless housing program; and the housing trust fund and other legislative appropriations.

Sec. 6   RCW 43.185.050 and 2006 c 371 s 236 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) The department shall use moneys from the housing trust fund and other legislative appropriations to finance in whole or in part any loans or grant projects that will provide housing for persons and families with special housing needs and with incomes at or below fifty percent of the median family income for the county or standard metropolitan statistical area where the project is located. At least thirty percent of these moneys used in any given funding cycle shall be for the benefit of projects located in rural areas of the state as defined by the department. If the department determines that it has not received an adequate number of suitable applications for rural projects during any given funding cycle, the department may allocate unused moneys for projects in nonrural areas of the state.
     (2) Activities eligible for assistance from the housing trust fund and other legislative appropriations include, but are not limited to:
     (a) New construction, rehabilitation, or acquisition of low and very low-income housing units;
     (b) Rent subsidies;
     (c) Matching funds for social services directly related to providing housing for special-need tenants in assisted projects;
     (d) Technical assistance, design and finance services and consultation, and administrative costs for eligible nonprofit community or neighborhood-based organizations;
     (e) Administrative costs for housing assistance groups or organizations when such grant or loan will substantially increase the recipient's access to housing funds other than those available under this chapter;
     (f) Shelters and related services for the homeless, including emergency shelters and overnight youth shelters;
     (g) Mortgage subsidies, including temporary rental and mortgage payment subsidies to prevent homelessness;
     (h) Mortgage insurance guarantee or payments for eligible projects;
     (i) Down payment or closing cost assistance for eligible first-time home buyers;
     (j) Acquisition of housing units for the purpose of preservation as low-income or very low-income housing; and
     (k) Projects making housing more accessible to families with members who have disabilities((; and
     (l) During the 2005-2007 fiscal biennium, a manufactured/mobile home landlord-tenant ombudsman conflict resolution and park registration program.
     (3) During the 2005-2007 fiscal biennium, revenues generated under RCW 36.22.178 may be used for the development of affordable housing projects and other activities funded in section 108, chapter 371, Laws of 2006
)).
     (((4))) (3) Legislative appropriations from capital bond proceeds may be used only for the costs of projects authorized under subsection (2)(a), (i), and (j) of this section, and not for the administrative costs of the department.
     (((5))) (4) Moneys from repayment of loans from appropriations from capital bond proceeds may be used for all activities necessary for the proper functioning of the housing assistance program except for activities authorized under subsection (2)(b) and (c) of this section.
     (((6))) (5) Administrative costs of the department shall not exceed five percent of the annual funds available for the housing assistance program.
     (6) The department shall include a life-cycle cost analysis in its process for evaluating proposals for state funding. This requirement does not apply to proposals funded by legislative appropriations from capital bond proceeds.
     (7) By December 1st of each year, beginning December 1, 2011, the department shall prepare a report to the legislature and the office of financial management compiling the reports required under this subsection and section 7 of this act. The report must detail the distribution of funds, except for proposals funded by legislative appropriations from capital bond proceeds, for the preceding fiscal year, including:
     (a) A description of the process used by the department for allocating funds;
     (b) The use of funds including, but not limited to, housing vouchers, program services, and housing projects; and
     (c) The criteria used for making funding allocation decisions.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 7   A new section is added to chapter 36.01 RCW to read as follows:
     By September 30th of each year, beginning September 30, 2011, a county receiving funding authorized under RCW 36.22.178 (1) and (2), 36.22.179(1) (a) and (b), and 36.22.1791(1) (a) and (b) shall:
     (1) Include a life-cycle cost analysis as one of the criteria in deciding which proposals to award funds; and
     (2) Submit to the department of commerce a report describing the distribution of funds for the preceding fiscal year. The report must include:
     (a) A description of the process used by the county for allocating funds;
     (b) The use of funds including, but not limited to, housing vouchers, program services, and housing projects; and
     (c) The criteria used for making funding allocation decisions.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 8   A new section is added to chapter 36.01 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) Counties must place a high priority on cost control and house the greatest number of qualified individuals within existing funds as part of the decision-making process in awarding public resources and funds by performing the following actions:
     (a) Document efforts by the county to publicize cost reduction and cost-effectiveness strategies;
     (b) Track and report on costs of projects funded by recording surcharge fees;
     (c) Require developers to submit an audited final cost certification detailing total development costs and all sources of permanent financing. The analysis must include direct comparisons of differences in costs between developments applying for financing from publicly administered sources and vouchers;
     (d) For every dollar funded and expended, maximize the number of homeless and severely rent-burdened individuals housed and place qualified individuals in the most deconcentrated settings;
     (e) Move, as expediently as possible, waiting lists for housing. The waiting lists may not be controlled by endeavors to keep publicly funded housing projects fully populated;
     (f) Ensure that administrators of these funds make concentrated efforts to locate small private rental units under twenty units to place qualified individuals with vouchers as these units are typically not surveyed for vacancies and provide the greatest opportunity for localized housing; and
     (g) Ensure that voucher programs provide vouchers for as long as necessary, as opposed to providing vouchers for a limited period of time, in order to provide renters with consistency and an opportunity to live where they desire.
     (2) The administration of the cost-saving devices under this section and efforts to maximize the number of qualified individuals housed must be funded within existing program resources.

--- END ---