CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2191

Chapter 94, Laws of 2012

62nd Legislature
2012 Regular Session



POLICE DOGS



EFFECTIVE DATE: 06/07/12

Passed by the House March 3, 2012
  Yeas 95   Nays 0

FRANK CHOPP
________________________________________    
Speaker of the House of Representatives


Passed by the Senate February 28, 2012
  Yeas 49   Nays 0


BRAD OWEN
________________________________________    
President of the Senate
 
CERTIFICATE

I, Barbara Baker, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2191 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth.


BARBARA BAKER
________________________________________    
Chief Clerk
Approved March 29, 2012, 1:18 p.m.








CHRISTINE GREGOIRE
________________________________________    
Governor of the State of Washington
 
FILED
March 29, 2012







Secretary of State
State of Washington


_____________________________________________ 

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2191
_____________________________________________

AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE

Passed Legislature - 2012 Regular Session
State of Washington62nd Legislature2012 Regular Session

By House Public Safety & Emergency Preparedness (originally sponsored by Representatives Rivers, Blake, Klippert, Hurst, Haler, Takko, Alexander, Hope, Harris, and Reykdal)

READ FIRST TIME 01/31/12.   



     AN ACT Relating to police dogs; amending RCW 16.08.040 and 9A.76.200; and prescribing penalties.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

Sec. 1   RCW 16.08.040 and 1941 c 77 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) The owner of any dog which shall bite any person while such person is in or on a public place or lawfully in or on a private place including the property of the owner of such dog, shall be liable for such damages as may be suffered by the person bitten, regardless of the former viciousness of such dog or the owner's knowledge of such viciousness.
     (2) This section does not apply to the lawful application of a police dog, as defined in RCW 4.24.410.

Sec. 2   RCW 9A.76.200 and 2003 c 269 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) A person is guilty of harming a police dog, accelerant detection dog, or police horse, if he or she maliciously injures, disables, shoots, or kills by any means any dog or horse that the person knows or has reason to know to be a police dog or accelerant detection dog, as defined in RCW 4.24.410, or police horse, as defined in subsection (2) of this section, whether or not the dog or horse is actually engaged in police or accelerant detection work at the time of the injury.
     (2) "Police horse" means any horse used or kept for use by a law enforcement officer in discharging any legal duty or power of his or her office.
     (3) Harming a police dog, accelerant detection dog, or police horse is a class C felony.
     (4)(a) In addition to the criminal penalty provided in this section for harming a police dog:
     (i) The court may impose a civil penalty of up to five thousand dollars for harming a police dog.
     (ii) The court shall impose a civil penalty of at least five thousand dollars and may increase the penalty up to a maximum of ten thousand dollars for killing a police dog.
     (b) Moneys collected must be distributed to the jurisdiction that owns the police dog.


         Passed by the House March 3, 2012.
         Passed by the Senate February 28, 2012.
         Approved by the Governor March 29, 2012.
         Filed in Office of Secretary of State March 29, 2012.