CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

HOUSE BILL 2834

Chapter 5, Laws of 2012

(partial veto)

62nd Legislature
2012 1st Special Session



LOCAL GOVERNMENT--REPORTING REQUIREMENTS



EFFECTIVE DATE: 07/10/12

Passed by the House April 10, 2012
  Yeas 98   Nays 0

FRANK CHOPP
________________________________________    
Speaker of the House of Representatives


Passed by the Senate April 10, 2012
  Yeas 47   Nays 0


BRAD OWEN
________________________________________    
President of the Senate
 
CERTIFICATE

I, Barbara Baker, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is HOUSE BILL 2834 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth.


BARBARA BAKER
________________________________________    
Chief Clerk
Approved May 2, 2012, 1:46 p.m., with the exception of Section 4 which is vetoed.







CHRISTINE GREGOIRE
________________________________________    
Governor of the State of Washington
 
FILED
May 2, 2012







Secretary of State
State of Washington


_____________________________________________ 

HOUSE BILL 2834
_____________________________________________

Passed Legislature - 2012 1st Special Session
State of Washington62nd Legislature2012 1st Special Session

By Representatives Alexander, Springer, and Angel

Read first time 04/10/12.   



     AN ACT Relating to providing cost savings for local governments by reducing a limited number of reporting requirements; amending RCW 35.22.620, 36.27.020, and 36.70A.180; adding a new section to chapter 43.41 RCW; and repealing RCW 35.21.687 and 36.34.137.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

Sec. 1   RCW 35.22.620 and 2009 c 229 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) As used in this section, the term "public works" means as defined in RCW 39.04.010.
     (2) A first-class city may have public works performed by contract pursuant to public notice and call for competitive bids. As limited by subsection (3) of this section, a first-class city may have public works performed by city employees in any annual or biennial budget period equal to a dollar value not exceeding ten percent of the public works construction budget, including any amount in a supplemental public works construction budget, over the budget period. The amount of public works that a first-class city has a county perform for it under RCW 35.77.020 shall be included within this ten percent limitation.
     If a first-class city has public works performed by public employees in any budget period that are in excess of this ten percent limitation, the amount in excess of the permitted amount shall be reduced from the otherwise permitted amount of public works that may be performed by public employees for that city in its next budget period. Twenty percent of the motor vehicle fuel tax distributions to that city shall be withheld if two years after the year in which the excess amount of work occurred, the city has failed to so reduce the amount of public works that it has performed by public employees. The amount so withheld shall be distributed to the city when it has demonstrated in its reports to the state auditor that the amount of public works it has performed by public employees has been so reduced.
     Whenever a first-class city has had public works performed in any budget period up to the maximum permitted amount for that budget period, all remaining public works within that budget period shall be done by contract pursuant to public notice and call for competitive bids.
     The state auditor shall report to the state treasurer any first-class city that exceeds this amount and the extent to which the city has or has not reduced the amount of public works it has performed by public employees in subsequent years.
     (3) In addition to the percentage limitation provided in subsection (2) of this section, a first-class city shall not have public employees perform a public works project in excess of ninety thousand dollars if more than a single craft or trade is involved with the public works project, or a public works project in excess of forty-five thousand dollars if only a single craft or trade is involved with the public works project or the public works project is street signalization or street lighting. A public works project means a complete project. The restrictions in this subsection do not permit the division of the project into units of work or classes of work to avoid the restriction on work that may be performed by day labor on a single project.
     (4) In addition to the accounting and record-keeping requirements contained in RCW 39.04.070, every first-class city annually ((shall)) may prepare a report for the state auditor indicating the total public works construction budget and supplemental public works construction budget for that year, the total construction costs of public works performed by public employees for that year, and the amount of public works that is performed by public employees above or below ten percent of the total construction budget. However, if a city budgets on a biennial basis, this annual report ((shall)) may indicate the amount of public works that is performed by public employees within the current biennial period that is above or below ten percent of the total biennial construction budget.
     Each first-class city with a population of one hundred fifty thousand or less shall use the form required by RCW 43.09.205 to account and record costs of public works in excess of five thousand dollars that are not let by contract.
     (5) The cost of a separate public works project shall be the costs of materials, supplies, equipment, and labor on the construction of that project. The value of the public works budget shall be the value of all the separate public works projects within the budget.
     (6) The competitive bidding requirements of this section may be waived by the city legislative authority pursuant to RCW 39.04.280 if an exemption contained within that section applies to the work or contract.
     (7) In lieu of the procedures of subsections (2) and (6) of this section, a first-class city may let contracts using the small works roster process in RCW 39.04.155.
     Whenever possible, the city shall invite at least one proposal from a minority or woman contractor who shall otherwise qualify under this section.
     (8) The allocation of public works projects to be performed by city employees shall not be subject to a collective bargaining agreement.
     (9) This section does not apply to performance-based contracts, as defined in RCW 39.35A.020(4), that are negotiated under chapter 39.35A RCW.
     (10) Nothing in this section shall prohibit any first-class city from allowing for preferential purchase of products made from recycled materials or products that may be recycled or reused.

Sec. 2   RCW 36.27.020 and 1995 c 194 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:
     The prosecuting attorney shall:
     (1) Be legal adviser of the legislative authority, giving ((them [it])) it his or her written opinion when required by the legislative authority or the chairperson thereof touching any subject which the legislative authority may be called or required to act upon relating to the management of county affairs;
     (2) Be legal adviser to all county and precinct officers and school directors in all matters relating to their official business, and when required draw up all instruments of an official nature for the use of said officers;
     (3) Appear for and represent the state, county, and all school districts subject to the supervisory control and direction of the attorney general in all criminal and civil proceedings in which the state or the county or any school district in the county may be a party;
     (4) Prosecute all criminal and civil actions in which the state or the county may be a party, defend all suits brought against the state or the county, and prosecute actions upon forfeited recognizances and bonds and actions for the recovery of debts, fines, penalties, and forfeitures accruing to the state or the county;
     (5) Attend and appear before and give advice to the grand jury when cases are presented to it for consideration and draw all indictments when required by the grand jury;
     (6) Institute and prosecute proceedings before magistrates for the arrest of persons charged with or reasonably suspected of felonies when the prosecuting attorney has information that any such offense has been committed and the prosecuting attorney shall for that purpose attend when required by them if the prosecuting attorney is not then in attendance upon the superior court;
     (7) Carefully tax all cost bills in criminal cases and take care that no useless witness fees are taxed as part of the costs and that the officers authorized to execute process tax no other or greater fees than the fees allowed by law;
     (8) Receive all cost bills in criminal cases before district judges at the trial of which the prosecuting attorney was not present, before they are lodged with the legislative authority for payment, whereupon the prosecuting attorney may retax the same and the prosecuting attorney must do so if the legislative authority deems any bill exorbitant or improperly taxed;
     (9) Present all violations of the election laws which may come to the prosecuting attorney's knowledge to the special consideration of the proper jury;
     (10) Examine once in each year the official bonds of all county and precinct officers and report to the legislative authority any defect in the bonds of any such officer;
     (11) ((Make an annual report to the governor as of the 31st of December of each year setting forth the amount and nature of business transacted by the prosecuting attorney in that year with such other statements and suggestions as the prosecuting attorney may deem useful;
     (12) Send to the state liquor control board at the end of each year a written report of all prosecutions brought under the state liquor laws in the county during the preceding year, showing in each case, the date of trial, name of accused, nature of charges, disposition of case, and the name of the judge presiding;
     (13)
)) Seek to reform and improve the administration of criminal justice and stimulate efforts to remedy inadequacies or injustice in substantive or procedural law.

Sec. 3   RCW 36.70A.180 and 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 s 19 are each amended to read as follows:
     (((1))) It is the intent of the legislature that counties and cities required to adopt a comprehensive plan under RCW 36.70A.040(1) begin implementing this chapter on or before July 1, 1990, including but not limited to: (((a))) (1) Inventorying, designating, and conserving agricultural, forest, and mineral resource lands, and critical areas; and (((b))) (2) considering the modification or adoption of comprehensive land use plans and development regulations implementing the comprehensive land use plans. It is also the intent of the legislature that funds be made available to counties and cities beginning July 1, 1990, to assist them in meeting the requirements of this chapter.
     (((2) Each county and city that adopts a plan under RCW 36.70A.040 (1) or (2) shall report to the department annually for a period of five years, beginning on January 1, 1991, and each five years thereafter, on the progress made by that county or city in implementing this chapter.))

     *NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4   A new section is added to chapter 43.41 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) The legislature finds that over the years there have been a number of reporting requirements, mandates, and programs created that frequently duplicate the duties of local government, create additional expenses for state and local government, and can obscure responsibilities. The legislature establishes the process outlined in this section to recommend the elimination of obsolete, redundant, or unnecessary reports, mandates, and programs.
     (2) The office must develop a process and criteria with statewide organizations representing cities and counties to conduct a review of reports, mandates, and programs that create additional expenses for state and local government. Every odd-numbered year, the office must submit recommendations to the legislature on which reports, programs, and mandates should be terminated or consolidated based upon the criteria developed with statewide organizations representing cities and counties. The report must state which criteria were relied upon with respect to each recommendation. The office must submit executive request legislation each odd-numbered year to implement the recommendations.
     *Sec. 4 was vetoed. See message at end of chapter.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 5   The following acts or parts of acts are each repealed:
     (1) RCW 35.21.687 (Affordable housing -- Inventory of suitable housing) and 1995 c 399 s 37 & 1993 c 461 s 4; and
     (2) RCW 36.34.137 (Affordable housing -- Inventory of suitable property) and 1993 c 461 s 5.


         Passed by the House April 10, 2012.
         Passed by the Senate April 10, 2012.
         Approved by the Governor May 2, 2012, with the exception of certain items that were vetoed.
         Filed in Office of Secretary of State May 2, 2012.

     Note: Governor's explanation of partial veto is as follows:

"I am returning herewith, without my approval as to Section 4, House Bill 2834 entitled:

     "AN ACT Relating to providing cost savings for local governments by reducing a limited number of reporting requirements."

Section 4 contains two directives. The first requires the Office of Financial Management (OFM) to conduct a review of reports, programs, and mandates required of state and local governments to determine those that are obsolete or unnecessary. The second requires OFM to develop and submit executive request legislation to terminate specific reports, programs, and mandates based on the review. While I agree that conducting a sunset review of requirements imposed on state and local governments would be beneficial, I do not believe it is appropriate for the Legislature to mandate the content of executive request legislation. Article III, section 6 of the Washington Constitution provides that the Governor shall recommend to the Legislature such measures as the Governor deems expedient for their action. Section 4 is inconsistent with this constitutional provision and the constitutional separation of powers.

I will direct OFM to work with statewide organizations representing cities and counties to create a process to review reports, mandates, and programs that create additional expenses for state and local governments. OFM will report to the Governor and the Legislature and submit recommendations on executive request legislation to the Governor.

For this reason, I have vetoed Section 4 of House Bill 2834.

With the exception of Section 4, House Bill 2834 is approved."