SSB 5577 -
By Senators Carrell, Darneille
NOT ADOPTED UPON RECONSIDERATION 03/07/2013
On page 10, line 35, after "if the" strike "auditor" and insert "ethics board"
On page 13, line 33, after "if the" strike "auditor" and insert "ethics board"
On page 14, after line 28, insert the following:
"Sec. 14 RCW 42.40.020 and 2008 c 266 s 2 are each amended to
read as follows:
As used in this chapter, the terms defined in this section shall
have the meanings indicated unless the context clearly requires
otherwise.
(1) "Auditor" means the office of the state auditor.
(2) "Employee" means any individual employed or holding office in
any department or agency of state government.
(3) "Good faith" means the individual providing the information or
report of improper governmental activity has a reasonable basis in fact
for reporting or providing the information. An individual who
knowingly provides or reports, or who reasonably ought to know he or
she is providing or reporting, malicious, false, or frivolous
information, or information that is provided with reckless disregard
for the truth, or who knowingly omits relevant information is not
acting in good faith.
(4) "Gross mismanagement" means the exercise of management
responsibilities in a manner grossly deviating from the standard of
care or competence that a reasonable person would observe in the same
situation.
(5) "Gross waste of funds" means to spend or use funds or to allow
funds to be used without valuable result in a manner grossly deviating
from the standard of care or competence that a reasonable person would
observe in the same situation.
(6)(a) "Improper governmental action" means any action by an
employee undertaken in the performance of the employee's official
duties:
(i) Which is a gross waste of public funds or resources as defined
in this section;
(ii) Which is in violation of federal or state law or rule, if the
violation is not merely technical or of a minimum nature;
(iii) Which is of substantial and specific danger to the public
health or safety;
(iv) Which is gross mismanagement; or
(v) Which prevents the dissemination of scientific opinion or
alters technical findings without scientifically valid justification,
unless state law or a common law privilege prohibits disclosure. This
provision is not meant to preclude the discretion of agency management
to adopt a particular scientific opinion or technical finding from
among differing opinions or technical findings to the exclusion of
other scientific opinions or technical findings. Nothing in this
subsection prevents or impairs a state agency's or public official's
ability to manage its public resources or its employees in the
performance of their official job duties. This subsection does not
apply to de minimis, technical disagreements that are not relevant for
otherwise improper governmental activity. Nothing in this provision
requires the auditor to contract or consult with external experts
regarding the scientific validity, invalidity, or justification of a
finding or opinion.
(b) "Improper governmental action" does not include personnel
actions, for which other remedies exist, including but not limited to
employee grievances, complaints, appointments, promotions, transfers,
assignments, reassignments, reinstatements, restorations,
reemployments, performance evaluations, reductions in pay, dismissals,
suspensions, demotions, violations of the state civil service law,
alleged labor agreement violations, reprimands, claims of
discriminatory treatment, or any action which may be taken under
chapter 41.06 RCW, or other disciplinary action except as provided in
RCW 42.40.030.
(7) "Public official" means the attorney general's designee or
designees; the director, or equivalent thereof in the agency where the
employee works; an appropriate number of individuals designated to
receive whistleblower reports by the head of each agency; or the
executive ethics board.
(8) "Substantial and specific danger" means a risk of serious
injury, illness, peril, or loss, to which the exposure of the public is
a gross deviation from the standard of care or competence which a
reasonable person would observe in the same situation.
(9) "Use of official authority or influence" includes threatening,
taking, directing others to take, recommending, processing, or
approving any personnel action such as an appointment, promotion,
transfer, assignment including but not limited to duties and office
location, reassignment, reinstatement, restoration, reemployment,
performance evaluation, determining any material changes in pay,
provision of training or benefits, tolerance of a hostile work
environment, or any adverse action under chapter 41.06 RCW, or other
disciplinary action.
(10)(a) "Whistleblower" means:
(i) An employee who in good faith reports alleged improper
governmental action to the auditor or other public official, as defined
in subsection (7) of this section, initiating an investigation by the
auditor under RCW 42.40.040; or
(ii) An employee who is perceived by the employer as reporting,
whether they did or not, alleged improper governmental action to the
auditor or other public official, as defined in subsection (7) of this
section, initiating an investigation by the auditor under RCW
42.40.040.
(b) For purposes of the provisions of this chapter and chapter
49.60 RCW relating to reprisals and retaliatory action, the term
"whistleblower" also means:
(i) An employee who in good faith provides information to the
auditor or other public official, as defined in subsection (7) of this
section, in connection with an investigation under RCW 42.40.040 and an
employee who is believed to have reported asserted improper
governmental action to the auditor or other public official, as defined
in subsection (7) of this section, or to have provided information to
the auditor or other public official, as defined in subsection (7) of
this section, in connection with an investigation under RCW 42.40.040
but who, in fact, has not reported such action or provided such
information; ((or))
(ii) An employee who in good faith identifies rules warranting
review or provides information to the rules review committee, and an
employee who is believed to have identified rules warranting review or
provided information to the rules review committee but who, in fact,
has not done so; or
(iii) Any person who is a state employee and who files an ethics
complaint as defined in chapter 42.52 RCW."
Renumber the remaining section consecutively and correct any internal references accordingly.
SSB 5577 -
By Senators Carrell, Darneille
NOT ADOPTED UPON RECONSIDERATION 03/07/2013
On page 1, line 3 of the title, after "42.52.420," strike "and 42.52.460" and insert "42.52.460, and 42.40.020"
EFFECT: This amendment makes technical changes related to securing whistleblower protection for state employees who make ethics complaints.