HOUSE BILL REPORT
SHB 1960
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent. |
As Reported by House Committee On:
Finance
Title: An act relating to establishing benefit assessment charges for metropolitan park districts.
Brief Description: Establishing benefit assessment charges for metropolitan park districts.
Sponsors: House Committee on Finance (originally sponsored by Representative Seaquist).
Brief History:
Committee Activity:
Finance: 2/26/13, 2/28/13, 1/16/14 [DP2S].
Brief Summary of Second Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE |
Majority Report: The second substitute bill be substituted therefor and the second substitute bill do pass. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Carlyle, Chair; Tharinger, Vice Chair; Fitzgibbon, Hansen, Lytton, Pollet and Reykdal.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 5 members: Representatives Nealey, Ranking Minority Member; Orcutt, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Condotta, Vick and Wilcox.
Staff: Jeffrey Mitchell (786-7139).
Background:
Metropolitan Park Districts.
A metropolitan park district (MPD) is a type of special purpose district that may be created for the management, control, improvement, maintenance, or acquisition of parks, parkways, boulevards, and recreational facilities. A MPD may levy up to 75 cents per $1,000 of assessed value of property for park purposes.
Benefit Assessment Districts.
A benefit charge is a type of assessment used by districts and regional fire protection service authorities. A benefit charge is not based on the value of real property, but is instead linked to other factors such as insurance savings or the distance from fire service facilities. A district or authority may use this funding approach as a means for apportioning the costs of service to an individual property in a manner that reflects the actual benefits provided to that property.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Summary of Second Substitute Bill:
A MPD may, by resolution, impose benefit charges on real property located within the district to support park purposes. The benefit charges may not exceed the amount that could be collected under the metropolitan park district property tax levy. The benefit charge must be reasonably proportioned to the measurable benefits to property resulting from proximity to the park facilities maintained by the MPD.
A benefit charge is not effective until approved by a majority of voters at a general or special election. The election must be held not more than 12 months prior to the first charge being assessed, and the benefit charge expires in six or fewer years as authorized by voters. A public hearing must be held not fewer than 10 days nor more than six months before the election to impose benefit charges.
Prior to November 15 of each year, the governing board of the MPD must hold a public hearing to review and establish benefit charges. After notice has been given to property owners of the amount of a benefit charge, the MPD must form a review board to hear complaints from aggrieved parties, and adjust charges as they believe to be true and fair.
All property not assessed and subjected to ad valorem taxation property taxes is exempt from the benefit charge.
Second Substitute Bill Compared to Substitute Bill:
The second substitute bill clarifies that the maximum benefit charge cannot exceed the maximum amount a metropolitan park district could receive through its regular property tax levy.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available on original bill.
Effective Date of Second Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
See House Bill Report in the 2013 Regular Session.
Persons Testifying: See House Bill Report in the 2013 Regular Session.
Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: See House Bill Report in the 2013 Regular Session.