BILL REQ. #:  H-3031.2 



_____________________________________________ 

HOUSE BILL 2245
_____________________________________________
State of Washington63rd Legislature2014 Regular Session

By Representatives Ormsby, Riccelli, Ryu, and Pollet

Read first time 01/15/14.   Referred to Committee on Local Government.



     AN ACT Relating to vesting in urban growth areas with recently added territory; amending RCW 19.27.095, 58.17.033, and 36.70A.300; and adding a new section to chapter 36.70A RCW.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

Sec. 1   RCW 19.27.095 and 1991 c 281 s 27 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) Except as provided in section 4 of this act, a valid and fully complete building permit application for a structure, that is permitted under the zoning or other land use control ordinances in effect on the date of the application shall be considered under the building permit ordinance in effect at the time of application, and the zoning or other land use control ordinances in effect on the date of application.
     (2) The requirements for a fully completed application shall be defined by local ordinance but for any construction project costing more than five thousand dollars the application shall include, at a minimum:
     (a) The legal description, or the tax parcel number assigned pursuant to RCW 84.40.160, and the street address if available, and may include any other identification of the construction site by the prime contractor;
     (b) The property owner's name, address, and phone number;
     (c) The prime contractor's business name, address, phone number, current state contractor registration number; and
     (d) Either:
     (i) The name, address, and phone number of the office of the lender administering the interim construction financing, if any; or
     (ii) The name and address of the firm that has issued a payment bond, if any, on behalf of the prime contractor for the protection of the owner, if the bond is for an amount not less than fifty percent of the total amount of the construction project.
     (3) The information required on the building permit application by subsection (2)(a) through (d) of this section shall be set forth on the building permit document which is issued to the owner, and on the inspection record card which shall be posted at the construction site.
     (4) The information required by subsection (2) of this section and information supplied by the applicant after the permit is issued under subsection (5) of this section shall be kept on record in the office where building permits are issued and made available to any person on request. If a copy is requested, a reasonable charge may be made.
     (5) If any of the information required by subsection (2)(d) of this section is not available at the time the application is submitted, the applicant shall so state and the application shall be processed forthwith and the permit issued as if the information had been supplied, and the lack of the information shall not cause the application to be deemed incomplete for the purposes of vesting under subsection (1) of this section. However, the applicant shall provide the remaining information as soon as the applicant can reasonably obtain such information.
     (6) The limitations imposed by this section shall not restrict conditions imposed under chapter 43.21C RCW.

Sec. 2   RCW 58.17.033 and 1987 c 104 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) Except as provided in section 4 of this act, a proposed division of land, as defined in RCW 58.17.020, shall be considered under the subdivision or short subdivision ordinance, and zoning or other land use control ordinances, in effect on the land at the time a fully completed application for preliminary plat approval of the subdivision, or short plat approval of the short subdivision, has been submitted to the appropriate county, city, or town official.
     (2) The requirements for a fully completed application shall be defined by local ordinance.
     (3) The limitations imposed by this section shall not restrict conditions imposed under chapter 43.21C RCW.

Sec. 3   RCW 36.70A.300 and 2013 c 275 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) The board shall issue a final order that shall be based exclusively on whether or not a state agency, county, or city is in compliance with the requirements of this chapter, chapter 90.58 RCW as it relates to adoption or amendment of shoreline master programs, or chapter 43.21C RCW as it relates to adoption of plans, development regulations, and amendments thereto, under RCW 36.70A.040 or chapter 90.58 RCW.
     (2)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, the final order shall be issued within one hundred eighty days of receipt of the petition for review, or, if multiple petitions are filed, within one hundred eighty days of receipt of the last petition that is consolidated.
     (b) The board may extend the period of time for issuing a decision to enable the parties to settle the dispute if additional time is necessary to achieve a settlement, and (i) an extension is requested by all parties, or (ii) an extension is requested by the petitioner and respondent and the board determines that a negotiated settlement between the remaining parties could resolve significant issues in dispute. The request must be filed with the board not later than seven days before the date scheduled for the hearing on the merits of the petition. The board may authorize one or more extensions for up to ninety days each, subject to the requirements of this section.
     (3) In the final order, the board shall either:
     (a) Find that the state agency, county, or city is in compliance with the requirements of this chapter, chapter 90.58 RCW as it relates to the adoption or amendment of shoreline master programs, or chapter 43.21C RCW as it relates to adoption of plans, development regulations, and amendments thereto, under RCW 36.70A.040 or chapter 90.58 RCW; or
     (b) Find that the state agency, county, or city is not in compliance with the requirements of this chapter, chapter 90.58 RCW as it relates to the adoption or amendment of shoreline master programs, or chapter 43.21C RCW as it relates to adoption of plans, development regulations, and amendments thereto, under RCW 36.70A.040 or chapter 90.58 RCW, in which case the board shall remand the matter to the affected state agency, county, or city. The board shall specify a reasonable time not in excess of one hundred eighty days, or such longer period as determined by the board in cases of unusual scope or complexity, within which the state agency, county, or city shall comply with the requirements of this chapter. The board may require periodic reports to the board on the progress the jurisdiction is making towards compliance.
     (4)(a) Unless the board makes a determination of invalidity under RCW 36.70A.302 or the vesting of development rights is delayed pursuant to section 4 of this act, a finding of noncompliance and an order of remand shall not affect the validity of comprehensive plans and development regulations during the period of remand.
     (b) Unless the board makes a determination of invalidity, state agencies, commissions, and governing boards may not determine a county, city, or town to be ineligible or otherwise penalized in the acceptance of applications or the awarding of state agency grants or loans during the period of remand. This subsection (4)(b) applies only to counties, cities, and towns that have: (i) Delayed the initial effective date of the action subject to the petition before the board until after the board issues a final determination; or (ii) within thirty days of receiving notice of a petition for review by the board, delayed or suspended the effective date of the action subject to the petition before the board until after the board issues a final determination.
     (5) Any party aggrieved by a final decision of the hearings board may appeal the decision to superior court as provided in RCW 34.05.514 or 36.01.050 within thirty days of the final order of the board. Unless the board makes a determination of invalidity under RCW 36.70A.302, state agencies, commissions, or governing boards shall not penalize counties, cities, or towns during the pendency of an appeal as provided in RCW 43.17.250.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4   A new section is added to chapter 36.70A RCW to read as follows:
     Applications for development or other land use activities in territory added to an urban growth area do not vest until the latest of the following dates:
     (1) Sixty days after the date of publication of notice of the comprehensive plan, development regulation, or amendment to the plan or regulation adoption, modifying the boundaries of the urban growth area, as provided in RCW 36.70A.290(2); or
     (2) If a petition for review to the growth management hearings board is timely filed:
     (a) Upon issuance of the board's final order finding that the comprehensive plan, development regulation, or amendment to the plan or regulation is in compliance with statutory requirements, as provided in RCW 36.70A.300(3)(a); or
     (b) If the board finds that the comprehensive plan, development regulation, or amendments to the plan or regulation are not in compliance with the requirements of this chapter, upon the board's subsequent review and determination that the jurisdiction is in compliance.

--- END ---