Passed by the Senate April 24, 2013 YEAS 47   ________________________________________ President of the Senate Passed by the House April 15, 2013 YEAS 96   ________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives | I, Hunter G. Goodman, Secretary of the Senate of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5577 as passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives on the dates hereon set forth. ________________________________________ Secretary | |
Approved ________________________________________ Governor of the State of Washington | Secretary of State State of Washington |
State of Washington | 63rd Legislature | 2013 Regular Session |
READ FIRST TIME 02/20/13.
AN ACT Relating to protecting public employees who act ethically and legally; amending RCW 42.52.410, 42.52.360, 42.52.420, 42.52.460, and 42.56.240; adding a new section to chapter 42.52 RCW; creating a new section; and prescribing penalties.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 The legislature finds that ensuring public
trust in government is a priority. The public expects its elected
officials and state employees to adhere to the highest ethical
standards during their service, and this includes a commitment to full
and independent investigations, with proper penalties, in cases where
the ethics in public service act is violated.
Sec. 2 RCW 42.52.410 and 1994 c 154 s 211 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) A person may, personally or by his or her attorney, make, sign,
and file with the appropriate ethics board a complaint on a form
provided by the appropriate ethics board. The complaint shall state
the name of the person alleged to have violated this chapter or rules
adopted under it and the particulars thereof, and contain such other
information as may be required by the appropriate ethics board.
(2) If it has reason to believe that any person has been engaged or
is engaging in a violation of this chapter or rules adopted under it,
an ethics board may issue a complaint.
(3)(a) A state employee who files a complaint with the appropriate
ethics board shall be afforded the protection afforded to a
whistleblower under RCW 42.40.050 and 49.60.210(2), subject to the
limitations of RCW 42.40.035 and 42.40.910. An agency, manager, or
supervisor may not retaliate against a state employee who, after making
a reasonable attempt to ascertain the correctness of the information
furnished, files a complaint with the appropriate ethics board.
(b) A state employee may not be denied the protections in chapter
42.40 RCW even if the ethics board denies an investigation of the
complaint.
(4) If a determination is made that a reprisal or retaliatory
action has been taken against the state employee, the retaliator may be
subject to a civil penalty of up to five thousand dollars.
Sec. 3 RCW 42.52.360 and 2005 c 106 s 5 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) The executive ethics board shall enforce this chapter and rules
adopted under it with respect to statewide elected officers and all
other officers and employees in the executive branch, boards and
commissions, and institutions of higher education.
(2) The executive ethics board shall enforce this chapter with
regard to the activities of university research employees as provided
in this subsection.
(a) With respect to compliance with RCW 42.52.030, 42.52.110,
42.52.130, 42.52.140, and 42.52.150, the administrative process shall
be consistent with and adhere to no less than the current standards in
regulations of the United States public health service and the office
of the secretary of the department of health and human services in
Title 42 C.F.R. Part 50, Subpart F relating to promotion of objectivity
in research.
(b) With respect to compliance with RCW 42.52.040, 42.52.080, and
42.52.120, the administrative process shall include a comprehensive
system for the disclosure, review, and approval of outside work
activities by university research employees while assuring that such
employees are fulfilling their employment obligations to the
university.
(c) With respect to compliance with RCW 42.52.160, the
administrative process shall include a reasonable determination by the
university of acceptable private uses having de minimis costs to the
university and a method for establishing fair and reasonable
reimbursement charges for private uses the costs of which are in excess
of de minimis.
(3) The executive ethics board shall:
(a) Develop educational materials and training;
(b) Adopt rules and policies governing the conduct of business by
the board, and adopt rules defining working hours for purposes of RCW
42.52.180 and where otherwise authorized under chapter 154, Laws of
1994;
(c) Issue advisory opinions;
(d) Investigate, hear, and determine complaints by any person or on
its own motion;
(e) Impose sanctions including reprimands and monetary penalties;
(f) Recommend to the appropriate authorities suspension, removal
from position, prosecution, or other appropriate remedy; and
(g) Establish criteria regarding the levels of civil penalties
appropriate for violations of this chapter and rules adopted under it.
(4) The board may:
(a) Issue subpoenas for the attendance and testimony of witnesses
and the production of documentary evidence relating to any matter under
examination by the board or involved in any hearing;
(b) Administer oaths and affirmations;
(c) Examine witnesses; and
(d) Receive evidence.
(5) The board shall not delegate to the board's executive director
its authority to issue advisories, advisory letters, or opinions.
(6) Except as provided in RCW 42.52.220, the executive ethics board
may review and approve agency policies as provided for in this chapter.
(((6))) (7) This section does not apply to state officers and state
employees of the judicial branch.
Sec. 4 RCW 42.52.420 and 2000 c 211 s 1 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) After the filing of any complaint, except as provided in RCW
42.52.450, the staff of the appropriate ethics board shall investigate
the complaint.
((The investigation shall be limited to the allegations contained
in the complaint.)) The ethics board may request the assistance of the
office of the attorney general or a contract investigator in conducting
its investigation.
(2) The results of the investigation shall be reduced to writing
and the staff shall either make a determination that the complaint
should be dismissed pursuant to RCW 42.52.425, or recommend to the
board that there is or that there is not reasonable cause to believe
that a violation of this chapter or rules adopted under it has been or
is being committed.
(3) The board's determination on reasonable cause shall be provided
to the complainant and to the person named in such complaint.
(4) The identity of a person filing a complaint under RCW
42.52.410(1) is exempt from public disclosure, as provided in RCW
42.56.240.
Sec. 5 RCW 42.52.460 and 1994 c 154 s 216 are each amended to
read as follows:
Any person who has notified the appropriate ethics board and the
attorney general in writing that there is reason to believe that RCW
42.52.180 is being or has been violated may, in the name of the state,
bring a citizen action for any of the actions authorized under this
chapter. A citizen action may be brought only if the appropriate
ethics board or the attorney general have failed to commence an action
under this chapter within forty-five days after notice from the person,
the person has thereafter notified the appropriate ethics board and the
attorney general that the person will commence a citizen's action
within ten days upon their failure to commence an action, and the
appropriate ethics board and the attorney general have in fact failed
to bring an action within ten days of receipt of the second notice. An
action is deemed to have been commenced when the appropriate ethics
board or the board's executive director accepts a complaint for filing
and initiates a preliminary investigation.
If the person who brings the citizen's action prevails, the
judgment awarded shall escheat to the state, but the person shall be
entitled to be reimbursed by the state of Washington for costs and
attorneys' fees incurred. If a citizen's action that the court finds
was brought without reasonable cause is dismissed, the court may order
the person commencing the action to pay all costs of trial and
reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by the defendant.
Upon commencement of a citizen action under this section, at the
request of a state officer or state employee who is a defendant, the
office of the attorney general shall represent the defendant if the
attorney general finds that the defendant's conduct complied with this
chapter and was within the scope of employment.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 6 A new section is added to chapter 42.52 RCW
to read as follows:
(1) Each executive branch agency shall designate an ethics advisor
or advisors to assist the agency's employees in understanding their
obligations under the ethics in public service act. Agencies shall
inform the executive ethics board of their designated advisors. As
funding permits and as determined by the executive ethics board and the
agency head, the advisors shall receive regular ethics training.
(2) Executive branch officers and employees are encouraged to
attend ethics training offered by the executive ethics board at least
once every thirty-six months.
Sec. 7 RCW 42.56.240 and 2012 c 88 s 1 are each amended to read
as follows:
The following investigative, law enforcement, and crime victim
information is exempt from public inspection and copying under this
chapter:
(1) Specific intelligence information and specific investigative
records compiled by investigative, law enforcement, and penology
agencies, and state agencies vested with the responsibility to
discipline members of any profession, the nondisclosure of which is
essential to effective law enforcement or for the protection of any
person's right to privacy;
(2) Information revealing the identity of persons who are witnesses
to or victims of crime or who file complaints with investigative, law
enforcement, or penology agencies, other than the commission, if
disclosure would endanger any person's life, physical safety, or
property. If at the time a complaint is filed the complainant, victim,
or witness indicates a desire for disclosure or nondisclosure, such
desire shall govern. However, all complaints filed with the commission
about any elected official or candidate for public office must be made
in writing and signed by the complainant under oath;
(3) Any records of investigative reports prepared by any state,
county, municipal, or other law enforcement agency pertaining to sex
offenses contained in chapter 9A.44 RCW or sexually violent offenses as
defined in RCW 71.09.020, which have been transferred to the Washington
association of sheriffs and police chiefs for permanent electronic
retention and retrieval pursuant to RCW 40.14.070(2)(b);
(4) License applications under RCW 9.41.070; copies of license
applications or information on the applications may be released to law
enforcement or corrections agencies;
(5) Information revealing the identity of child victims of sexual
assault who are under age eighteen. Identifying information means the
child victim's name, address, location, photograph, and in cases in
which the child victim is a relative or stepchild of the alleged
perpetrator, identification of the relationship between the child and
the alleged perpetrator;
(6) The statewide gang database referenced in RCW 43.43.762;
(7) Data from the electronic sales tracking system established in
RCW 69.43.165;
(8) Information submitted to the statewide unified sex offender
notification and registration program under RCW 36.28A.040(6) by a
person for the purpose of receiving notification regarding a registered
sex offender, including the person's name, residential address, and e-mail address; ((and))
(9) Personally identifying information collected by law enforcement
agencies pursuant to local security alarm system programs and vacation
crime watch programs. Nothing in this subsection shall be interpreted
so as to prohibit the legal owner of a residence or business from
accessing information regarding his or her residence or business; and
(10) The identity of a state employee or officer who has in good
faith filed a complaint with an ethics board, as provided in RCW
42.52.410, or who has in good faith reported improper governmental
action, as defined in RCW 42.40.020, to the auditor or other public
official, as defined in RCW 42.40.020.