HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1567
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent. |
As Reported by House Committee On:
Judiciary
Title: An act relating to revising the uniform interstate family support act.
Brief Description: Revising the uniform interstate family support act.
Sponsors: Representatives Walkinshaw, Fitzgibbon and Jinkins; by request of Department of Social and Health Services and Uniform Law Commission.
Brief History:
Committee Activity:
Judiciary: 2/5/15, 2/12/15 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY |
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 13 members: Representatives Jinkins, Chair; Kilduff, Vice Chair; Rodne, Ranking Minority Member; Shea, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Goodman, Haler, Hansen, Kirby, Klippert, Muri, Orwall, Stokesbary and Walkinshaw.
Staff: Edie Adams (786-7180).
Background:
The Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA) is designed to address child support issues that arise when parties reside in different states. The UIFSA was drafted by the National Conference of Commissions on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) in the 1990s, and by 1996, the federal law required all states to enact the UIFSA as a condition of receiving federal funds for the state's child support enforcement program and the state's Temporary Assistance to Needy Families program. The NCCUSL has made various changes to the UIFSA over the years, and Washington has adopted the 2001 version of the UIFSA.
The UIFSA addresses support orders. It does not authorize a court to address child custody issues. The UIFSA provides uniform rules and procedures for the establishment, modification, and enforcement of support where the parties reside in different states. The UIFSA addresses issues such as:
which state's order controls when there are proceedings initiated in multiple states;
when one state can modify an order issued in another state and to what extent modification is allowed;
when a state can obtain jurisdiction over a person to establish an order; and
how a party or enforcement agency registers, in this state, an order from a different state for purposes of enforcement.
In 2007 the United States signed the Hague Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance (Convention). The Convention establishes uniform procedures for the processing of international child support cases. According to the NCCUSL, the Convention provisions were largely modeled after the UIFSA principles.
The NCCUSL amended the UIFSA in 2008 (UIFSA 2008) to incorporate changes required by the Convention. Provisions from the Convention that could not be readily integrated into the existing UIFSA were placed in their own stand-alone sections of the UIFSA.
In 2014 Congress passed federal legislation implementing the Convention (the 2014 Preventing Sex Trafficking and Strengthening Families Act). The federal legislation requires all states to enact the UIFSA 2008 by the end of their 2015 legislative sessions. Failure to enact UIFSA 2008 could result in the state's child support plan being found not in compliance with federal requirements, which could jeopardize federal funding for the state's child support enforcement program. Once all states have enacted UIFSA 2008 and the President signs and deposits an instrument of ratification, the Convention will enter into force in the United States.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Summary of Substitute Bill:
The 2008 amendments to the UIFSA are adopted. The UIFSA 2008 incorporates the Convention provisions when possible by making changes throughout the statute to include foreign support orders, foreign tribunals, and parties to a support order that reside outside the United States. "Foreign country" means a foreign country in which the Convention is in force, or a foreign country that has been declared to be a foreign reciprocating country, that has an established a reciprocal arrangement with the state, or that has child support laws substantially similar to the UIFSA.
A new article of the UIFSA is created that applies only to support proceedings under the Convention. These new provisions applicable to Convention support orders address issues such as:
procedures for a party to a Convention support order to register and seek recognition of the order in this state;
procedures for a party to an order to contest the registration of an order in this state;
authority of a state court to vacate the registration of a Convention order under certain circumstances;
procedures for the recognition, enforcement, and vacation of foreign support agreements; and
procedures for a party to file a direct request in state court to establish or modify a support order or determine parentage under the Convention.
The act applies to proceedings begun on or after the effective date of the act to establish a support order or determine parentage of a child, or to register, recognize, enforce, or modify a prior support order whenever issued or entered.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
Inaccurate cross-references are corrected.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill contains an emergency clause and takes effect on July 1, 2015.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) It is important to pass this legislation this year to ensure continued federal funding for our child support enforcement and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families programs. There was bipartisan support for the federal implementing legislation. States around the country are adopting the act to come into compliance with federal law. Previous versions of UIFSA have been tremendously helpful in enabling the state to establish and enforce child support across state lines. This legislation provides similar sorts of rules and uniformity for addressing child support issues that cross international borders.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Representative Walkinshaw, prime sponsor; and Wally McClure, Department of Social and Health Services.
Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.