SENATE BILL REPORT

HB 1062

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As of March 20, 2015

Title: An act relating to updating the department of financial institutions' regulatory enforcement powers regarding credit unions and organizations providing services to credit unions.

Brief Description: Updating the department of financial institutions' regulatory enforcement powers regarding credit unions and organizations providing services to credit unions.

Sponsors: Representatives Stanford, Kirby, Gregerson, Vick and Ryu; by request of Department of Financial Institutions.

Brief History: Passed House: 2/11/15, 85-13.

Committee Activity: Financial Institutions & Insurance: 3/18/15.

SENATE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS & INSURANCE

Staff: Susan Jones (786-7404)

Background: Credit unions doing business in Washington may be chartered by the state or federal government. The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) regulates federally chartered credit unions. The Department of Financial Institutions (Department) regulates state-chartered credit unions.

Credit Union Governance and Practices.

Enforcement. The Department may use various enforcement tools and actions, including removing or suspending officers, directors, or supervisory committee members; issuing temporary cease and desist orders; assessing fines; inspecting records and business practices; and liquidating a credit union or taking it into receivership. Within ten days after the receiver takes possession of a credit union's assets, the credit union may serve notice upon the receiver to appear in court to show cause why the credit union should not be restored to the possession of its assets. The court must dismiss the complaint if it finds that the receiver was appointed for cause. If the court finds that no cause existed, the court must require that the receiver restore the credit union to possession of its assets.

Summary of Bill: Credit Union Governance and Practices.

Enforcement.

Various other technical changes are made.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.

Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: The bill modernizes the credit union charter. Credit unions have a choice of state and federal charters. We want the state charter to be the best choice of the two options which will allow for innovation and a level playing field. The federal parity date has not been updated for 14 years and this needs to be updated to be competitive. This was done in 2012 for the banking federal parity provisions. This updates the supervision and enforcement tools. Credit unions are growing bigger and more complex in the state of Washington and we need similar regulatory tools consistent with the state banking act. It clarifies certain areas including the special membership meetings which have been in question before. There has been extensive stakeholder meetings and work. The bill updates the definition of low-income which allows credit unions to use household income allowing for additional products and services. Mergers are important, and that the bill allows members from the outgoing credit unions to serve on the boards of the remaining credit union. The Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) has not had the tools to inform consumers regarding fictitious credit unions and to take action such as cease and desist. We have one of best charters and this bill will keep the charter vibrant and competitive. A healthy operating environment and a vibrant charter is not just the powers given to credit unions but the powers given to the regulator.

Persons Testifying: PRO: Representative Stanford, prime sponsor; Mark Minickiello, NW Credit Union Assn.; Linda Jekel, DFI.

Persons Signed in to Testify But Not Testifying:  No one.