Background:

Sexual Assault Kits. After a person has been the victim of a sexual assault, the person may undergo a forensic examination for the purpose of collecting any evidence that was left behind during the assault. The doctor or nurse conducting the examination preserves the evidence using a sexual assault forensic examination kit, also commonly referred to as a sexual assault kit (SAK) or rape kit. After the examination, custody of a SAK may be transferred to a law enforcement agency to be utilized during an investigation and subsequent criminal prosecution.

Prior to 2015, law enforcement agencies and prosecutors had discretion to send SAKs to forensic laboratories for testing, but were not required to do so. In 2015 the Legislature passed Substitute House Bill 1068 (SHB 1068), which requires a law enforcement agency to submit a SAK to the Washington State Patrol (WSP) Crime Laboratory within 30 days of receiving it, provided that the victim has consented to the testing. Consent is not a condition of submission if the SAK was collected from a non-emancipated minor. The requirement to test SAKs is prospective as of July 24, 2015, meaning it does not apply to previously unsubmitted SAKs.

Substitute House Bill 1068 also created the Sexual Assault Forensic Examination (SAFE) Best Practices Task Force to review best practice models for managing all aspects of sexual assault examinations and for reducing the number of untested SAKs in Washington. The SAFE Best Practices Task Force is composed of four legislators and 14 stakeholders representing specified interests and organizations.

Criminal Justice Training Commission. The Criminal Justice Training Commission (CJTC) provides basic law enforcement training, and educational programs for law enforcement, corrections, and other public safety professionals in Washington. The also certifies, and when necessary de-certifies, peace officers.

Basic law enforcement officer training is generally required of all law enforcement officers, with the exception of volunteers, and reserve officers employed in Washington. The Basic Law Enforcement Academy (BLEA) consists of a 720-hour program covering a wide variety of subjects including: criminal law and procedures, traffic enforcement, cultural awareness, communication and writing skills, emergency vehicle operations, firearms, crisis intervention, patrol procedures, and criminal investigation and defensive tactics.

In addition to the BLEA, the CJTC provides specialized training to commissioned officers on a range of subjects, including, for example, interviewing children in child abuse and neglect cases.

Private Funds for Sexual Assault Kits. The Washington SAK Program accepts private funds until June 1, 2022, for the Washington SAK Account. Funds are used exclusively for the following:

85 percent for the WSP for testing SAKs in the possession of a law enforcement agency but not submitted for forensic testing as of July 24, 2015; and
15 percent for the Office of Crime Victim Advocacy (OCVA) for Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner services and training.

Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill:

Unsubmitted Sexual Assault Kits. "Unsubmitted sexual assault kits" are SAKs that have not been submitted to a forensic laboratory for testing with the CODIS-eligible DNA (Combined DNA Index System) methodologies as of July 24, 2015, the effective date of the mandatory testing law in SHB 1068 (2015). Unsubmitted SAKs may include partially tested SAKs, which are SAKs that have only been subjected to serological testing, or that have previously been tested only with non-CODIS-eligible DNA methodologies. The term does not include untested SAKs that have been submitted to forensic labs for testing with CODIS-eligible DNA methodologies but are delayed for testing as a result of a backlog of work in the laboratory.

Washington Sexual Assault Kit Initiative Pilot Project. Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this specific purpose, the Washington Sexual Assault Kit Initiative (SAKI) Pilot Project is created for the purpose of providing funding through a competitive grant program to fund multidisciplinary community response teams seeking resolutions to cases tied to previously unsubmitted SAKs. The Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC) is required to administer the SAKI Pilot Project.

At least two grants must be given, including one in western Washington and one in eastern Washington, to:

a law enforcement agency;
a unit of local government;
a combination of units of local government;
a prosecutor's office; or
a governmental non-law enforcement agency acting as fiscal agent for one of the previously listed types.

A combination of jurisdictions, including contiguous jurisdictions of multiple towns, cities, or counties, may create a task force or other entity for the purposes of applying for and receiving a grant, provided that the relevant prosecutors and law enforcement agencies are acting in partnership in complying with the grant requirements.

Grant recipients must perform an inventory of all unsubmitted SAKs in the jurisdiction's possession and submit those SAKs for testing. Grant recipients must establish multidisciplinary cold case or sexual assault investigation teams for follow-up investigations and prosecutions resulting from evidence from the testing of previously unsubmitted SAKs. Cold case or sexual assault investigative teams must include prosecutors, law enforcement, and victim advocates for the duration of the project. The cold case or sexual assault investigative teams must also use victim-centered, trauma-informed protocols and other protocols established by the WASPC. The grant funds may support personnel costs, including hiring and overtime, to allow for adequate follow-up investigations and prosecutions. Grant awards must be prioritized for eligible applicants with a commitment to co-locate assigned prosecutors, law enforcement, and victim advocates for the duration of the grant program.

Participants in the SAKI Pilot Project must complete specialized training for victim-centered, trauma-informed investigation and prosecutions. The WASPC must also facilitate the hosting of a SAKI Summit in Washington, subject to the availability of funds. Other requirements for administering and participating in the SAKI Pilot Project are included in the bill.

The Office of the Attorney General is added to the membership of the SAFE Best Practices Task Force. Meetings of the SAFE Best Practices Task Force are subject to approval by the Senate and the House of Representatives.

Training. Subject to an appropriation, the CJTC must incorporate victim-centered, trauma-informed approaches to policing in the BLEA curriculum by July 1,2018.

Subject to an appropriation, the CJTC must provide ongoing specialized, intensive, and integrative training for persons responsible for investigating sexual assault cases involving adult victims. The training must be based on a victim-centered, trauma-informed approach to responding to sexual assault. Among other subjects, the training must include content on the neurobiology of trauma and trauma-informed interviewing, counseling, and investigative techniques. The CJTC must begin offering the training by July 1, 2018. Officers assigned to regularly investigate sexual assault involving adult victims must complete the training within one year of being assigned or by July 1, 2020, whichever is later.

Subject to an appropriation, the CJTC must develop training on a victim-centered, trauma-informed approach to interacting with victims and responding to sexual assault calls by July 1, 2018. Among other components, the curriculum must be designed for commissioned patrol officers not regularly assigned to investigate sexual assault cases and be designed for deployment and use within individual law enforcement agencies. All law enforcement agencies shall annually host the training.

The Sexual Assault Response and Prevention Account is created. The Legislature must prioritize appropriations from the account for:

the Washington SAKI Pilot Project;
the OCVA for the purpose of providing support and services, including educational and vocational training, to victims of sexual assault and trafficking;
victim-centered, trauma-informed training for prosecutors, law enforcement, and victim advocates, including, but not limited to, the training created in the bill; and
the WSP for the purpose of funding the statewide SAK tracking system and funding the forensic analysis of SAKs.

Private Funds for Sexual Assault Kits. Disbursements of private funds in the Washington SAK Account are changed to the following:

30 percent for the Washington SAKI Pilot Project;
30 percent for the CJTC for the training requirements in the bill;
10 percent for the OCVA for services to victims of sexual assault and training for professionals interacting with and providing services to victims of sexual assault; and
30 percent for the WSP for testing SAKs in the possession of a law enforcement agency but not submitted for forensic testing as of July 24, 2015, unless the WSP deems the funds are not necessary, in which case the funds shall be divided equally to the other purposes above.

A grantor of funds may enter into an agreement with the Department of Commerce for a different allocation of funds, provided that the funds are distributed for the purpose of the SAK Program. Within 30 days of entering into an agreement, the Department of Commerce must notify the SAFE Best Practices Task Force and the appropriate committees of the Legislature.

The disbursement requirements of public funds in the account are unchanged.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony (Public Safety):

(In support) Many of the policies in the bill are based on recommendations from the SAFE Best Practices Task Force. This bill is the next step toward providing justice to victims of sexual assault, especially for those whose SAKs remained untested for many years. Victims deserve more than to have their SAKs tested, they deserve to have their cases investigated. The SAFE Best Practice Task Force has reviewed other state's approaches for addressing unsubmitted SAKs, and it is clear that specialized cold case teams assigned to investigate these cases will produce more successful outcomes.

The bill is laudable for its emphasis on training to improve outcomes for victims. The cold case teams will have specialized training with a victim-centered, trauma-informed approach, which is particularly important in the context of notifying victims several years after an incident occurred. The bill is facilitating broad system improvements in support of sexual assault victims.

The AGO looks forward to administering the SAKI Pilot Project and assisting with cold case investigations. The AGO is in a good position to take this on, as they already work with law enforcement on cold cases every day.

While the patron fee in the bill is not based on the SAFE Best Practice Task Force recommendations, it is necessary in order to fund the bill's other provisions. There is a seriousness connection between trafficking and the adult entertainment clubs. Many women working in the clubs are assaulted and victimized.

There are some concerns with funding these programs with the patron fee, as it is not a sustainable and reliable source of funding to address the epidemic of sexual violence. The state should consider different sources of funding to build a robust system to respond to sexual violence.

(Opposed) The adult entertainment industry opposes the bill due to the funding source. The patron fee, while called a fee, is actually an unconstitutional tax and is being inappropriately applied to the industry. In Texas, where a similar tax exists, the state courts upheld the law based on the connection between alcohol and sexual assault. However, alcohol is not served in establishments in Washington. There is not a sufficient nexus between the industry and sexual violence. The bill assumes negative secondary effects without taking into account the women working in the establishments.

The adult entertainment industry in Washington is composed of legitimate, well-run businesses. Women working in the clubs are not sex workers or prostitutes. They are performers. Women need to get business licenses from the state and have a valid ID.

The patron fee in the bill promotes an unhealthy view of women. Sexual assault is not based on how women present themselves. Sexual assault is about power. However, in these establishments, women have the power. Women choose what they will and will not do. It is false to assume that men who patronize these establishments commit these horrible crimes.

There is only a fraction of clubs in Washington compared to Texas, and the tax is likely to decrease the volume of customers and will not generate the anticipated revenue.

(Other) The low reporting and conviction rate for violent sexual assault is truly shocking – an average of 0.6 percent of perpetrators are brought to justice. All SAKs should be tested and all of the cases should be investigated. It takes money to do these things, but the patron fee in the bill is not the proper funding source. There is not sufficient evidence to support a connection between strip clubs and sexual assault. This bill is not a content-neutral restriction on free speech.

The SAKI Pilot Project and SAK policies in the bill are praiseworthy, but there are concerns with the patron fee. Women working in the adult entertainment industry are independent contractors paying nightly fees to work at these facilities, and many even need to tip security to be escorted to their vehicles. They are not treated well, and typically make minimum wage after costs. The women believe the fee will be passed onto them. Many of these women experience higher levels of sexual violence, and it would be disappointing for them to end up bearing the burden of the fee. The bill should be funded through the General Fund.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony (Appropriations):

(In support) Washington leads the nation on testing and tracking sexual assault kits. The next step in the process is to investigate cases, prosecute perpetrators, and provide justice for victims. Our jurisdictions are starting to test kits and reopen cold cases, which could be five, 10, or 15 years old. Law enforcement training is imperative so officers use victim-centered approaches and understand trauma so survivors are not revictimized. The bill promotes best practices in victim notification and law enforcement responses.The patron fee is important because the sex industry has a strong connection to the trafficking of women and children. Many trafficking victims are coerced into prostitution, which does happen in some strip clubs. Exotic dancers are more likely to be victims of assault overall, including sexual assault. Last year, a Seattle club was shut down due to a prostitution ring. Dancers were coerced into sexual acts, and money was taken from them. Research by the Psychiatric Times shows after interviewing 845 women working in strip clubs, massage parlors, and street prostitution, 80 percent were sexually abused as children, 60 percent were raped during prostitution acts, and 85 percent were trying to escape the industry. There is a nexus between the sex industry as a whole and sexual assault.The new authority provided to the Office of the Attorney General (AGO) is discretionary and dependent on new grant funding. The AGO is currently seeking out federal funding. The AGO's Criminal Justice Division and Homicide Investigative Tracking Unit will administer the Washington Sexual Assault Kit Initiative (SAKI). Legal services will require approximately $240,000 per fiscal year.The fee is not a sustainable source of funding for core responses to sexual assault. The state needs strong, sustainable infrastructure that is not reliant on a fee so there is a well-informed and consistent statewide approach to sexual assault.

(Opposed) It is not possible to compare clubs statewide to one club that operates poorly. Washington needs an appropriate funding source for addressing sexual assault. The patron fee, while called a fee, is actually an unconstitutional tax and a restriction on free speech and women's rights. Broad generalizations about adult entertainment clubs do not reflect the reality in Washington. According to the Washington Department of Health, alcohol is a key risk factor for sexual assault. Several states passed similar taxes, but clubs in all of those states serve alcohol. In Texas, where a similar tax exists, the state courts upheld the law based on the connection between alcohol and sexual assault. However, alcohol is not served in establishments in Washington. There is not a sufficient nexus between the industry and sexual violence.The bill assumes negative secondary effects without taking into account the women working in the establishments. The adult entertainment industry in Washington is composed of legitimate, well-run businesses. Women working in the clubs are not sex workers or prostitutes; they are performers following the law. These are legal businesses in Washington, and entertainers need to get state business licenses. The patron fee promotes unhealthy attitudes and views of women. Instead, we should have the conversations about consent with our sons and daughters. The fee sets a precedence for charging a tax with the thought of what someone may do.