HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 2334
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent. |
As Reported by House Committee On:
Commerce & Gaming
Title: An act relating to the regulation of the use of cannabinoid additives in marijuana products.
Brief Description: Regulating the use of cannabinoid additives in marijuana products.
Sponsors: Representatives Sawyer and Kloba.
Brief History:
Committee Activity:
Commerce & Gaming: 1/8/18, 1/15/18 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE & GAMING |
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 8 members: Representatives Sawyer, Chair; Kloba, Vice Chair; Condotta, Ranking Minority Member; Vick, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Blake, Jenkin, Kirby and Ryu.
Minority Report: Without recommendation. Signed by 1 member: Representative Young.
Staff: Thamas Osborn (786-7129).
Background:
Cannabinoids and Cannabidiol.
The term "cannabinoid" encompasses a wide variety of organic compounds derived from the cannabis plant. Cannabidiol (CBD) is a type of cannabinoid that is believed to have potential health benefits and is the active ingredient in most regulated medical marijuana products produced and sold by Liquor and Cannabis Board (LCB) licensed marijuana producer/processors and retailers, respectively. In its purest form, CBD does not contain tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), which is the cannabis-derived psychoactive compound that causes euphoric effects. Properly purified CBD products may contain some THC, but the percentage of THC is generally small and does not reach levels typically found in regulated recreational marijuana products. Accordingly, in this state cannabis products, including CBD, that have a THC content of 0.3 percent or less do not meet the statutory definition of marijuana and therefore are not considered to be controlled substances.
Cannabidiol Products Obtained Outside of the Initiative 502 Regulatory System.
Cannabidiol concentrates are often used as an additive by licensed marijuana processors in order to enhance the CBD content of medical marijuana products. Although many marijuana processors have the technical ability to produce CBD concentrates, it is common for marijuana processors to purchase such concentrates from sources operating outside of the marijuana market regulated by the LCB and the Department of Health (DOH).
Most CBD concentrates used by state licensed marijuana processors are derived from hemp and imported from foreign countries engaged in hemp production. These imported CBD concentrates generally enter the country in the form of hemp oil. As a form of cannabis, hemp plants produce CBD that can be extracted and concentrated for use by state licensed marijuana processors in order to increase the CBD content of their medical marijuana products. Whether derived from hemp or marijuana, imported CBD concentrates are not subject to state regulation and therefore are not subject to laboratory testing for toxins and other impurities. Consequently, medical marijuana products that contain imported CBD additives may contain toxic substances that are undetected.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Summary of Substitute Bill:
State licensed marijuana producers and processors are unrestricted in their use of CBD products for the purpose of enhancing the CBD content of regulated marijuana products, provided such CBD products are lawfully produced by, or purchased from, an in-state producer or processor licensed by the LCB.
Licensees may also use CBD products for CBD enhancement purposes that are either imported or otherwise produced outside of the LCB regulatory system provided the CBD product has:
a THC level of 0.3 percent or less on a dry weight basis; and
been tested for contaminants and toxins by an accredited testing laboratory licensed by the LCB.
The term "CBD product" is defined as being any product containing or consisting of cannabidiol.
The LCB is authorized to enact the rules necessary to implement the requirements of this section.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The substitute bill makes the following changes to the original bill:
makes purely technical changes to language relating to laboratory accreditation;
eliminates provisions specifying procedural requirements the LCB must meet before approving a CBD product following laboratory testing; and
allows procedural requirements for approval by the LCB of a CBD product to be established by administrative rule.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) Cannabidiol products used by LCB licensed processors to enhance the CBD content of marijuana-related products are neither tested for purity nor subject to explicit regulation. The CBD products used by state licensed processors are either imported from foreign countries or sourced from other states and not subject to regulatory controls. Many CBD products contain pesticides, heavy metals, and other toxins that pose a threat to public health. Accordingly, all such products should be subject to laboratory testing and regulation by the LCB so as to ensure product purity and safety. The market for CBD products is large and should be regulated within the system created by Initiative 502.
(Opposed) Cannabidiol is a safe and useful product that should not be regulated by the LCB or the Washington State Department of Agriculture. Such regulations are not needed insofar as CBD is not a form of marijuana and does not contain THC. The World Health Organization recently did a study showing that CBD is a safe substance. There is no evidence that CBD presents any health risks and has been widely recognized as having many beneficial health effects. Most CBD is derived from hemp extracts obtained from Oregon and Colorado. If passed, this bill would all but eliminate patient access to CBD products and do great harm to the hemp industry. One of the primary uses of hemp is for the extraction of CBD and the regulations in the bill will ruin the CBD market, the hemp industry, and hemp farmers, as well. The bill represents yet another example of overregulation that is harmful to commercial activity. The LCB cannot be trusted to enact reasonable administrative rules regarding CBD.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Brooke Davies, Cannabis Organization of Retail Establishments; Kristi Weeks, Washington State Department of Health; and Phillip Dawdy, Have A Heart.
(Opposed) John Worthington, American Alliance for Medical Cannabis; Steve Sarich, Washington State Hemp Commission; Poppy Sidhu; Dana Luce and Stephen Rowland; and Pamela Bosch, Highland Hemp House.
Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.