CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT
SENATE BILL 6188
Chapter 265, Laws of 2018
65th Legislature
2018 Regular Session
LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS--POTENTIAL IMPEACHMENT LIST
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 7, 2018
SENATE BILL 6188
Passed Legislature - 2018 Regular Session
| | |
State of Washington | 65th Legislature | 2018 Regular Session |
By Senators Dhingra, O'Ban, Wilson, Van De Wege, and Kuderer
Read first time 01/10/18. Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.
AN ACT Relating to fairness in disciplinary actions of peace officers who appear on a prosecuting attorney's potential impeachment list; adding a new section to chapter
10.93 RCW; and creating a new section.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The United States supreme court has consistently found that prosecutors have the duty to disclose potentially exculpatory evidence to defense attorneys prior to trial. Some of the information that is being disclosed about government witnesses, often law enforcement officers, has not been substantiated or proven to any degree. This act prohibits a law enforcement agency from taking punitive action against a peace officer solely because the officer's name was placed on a potential impeachment list. This act specifically does not prohibit a law enforcement agency from taking punitive or personnel action against a peace officer based on the underlying acts or omissions for which that officer's name was placed on the list.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 10.93 RCW to read as follows:
A disciplinary action or any other adverse personnel action may not be undertaken by a law enforcement agency against a peace officer solely because that officer's name has been placed on a list maintained by a prosecuting attorney's office of recurring witnesses for whom there is known potential impeachment information, or that the officer's name may otherwise be subject to disclosure pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). This section does not prohibit a law enforcement agency from taking disciplinary action or any other adverse personnel action against a peace officer based on the underlying acts or omissions for which that officer's name was placed on a prosecutor-maintained list, or may otherwise be subject to disclosure pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), if the actions taken by the law enforcement agency otherwise conform to the rules and procedures adopted by the law enforcement agency as determined through collective bargaining.
Passed by the Senate February 9, 2018.
Passed by the House March 2, 2018.
Approved by the Governor March 23, 2018.
Filed in Office of Secretary of State March 26, 2018.
--- END ---