FINAL BILL REPORT

SHB 2417

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

C 82 L 20

Synopsis as Enacted

Brief Description: Concerning individuals serving community custody terms.

Sponsors: House Committee on Public Safety (originally sponsored by Representatives Davis and Peterson).

House Committee on Public Safety

House Committee on Appropriations

Senate Committee on Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation

Background:

Community Custody. Community custody is the portion of a person's criminal sentence served in the community under the supervision of the Department of Corrections (DOC) following his or her release from confinement in a state correctional facility. Courts are required to order community custody for persons convicted of certain crimes. The term of community custody varies depending upon the underlying offense and the person's risk to reoffend.

While on community custody, a person is subject to conditions imposed by the court and the DOC. The DOC may establish and modify conditions based on risks to community safety. If a person violates the conditions, he or she may be subject to sanctions.

Sanctions. In 2012 requirements for sanctioning violations of community custody were established. These are commonly referred to as "swift and certain" (SAC) sanctions. The SAC sanctions generally rely upon immediate and brief confinement sanctions in lieu of long-term confinement sanctions.

The DOC is required to adopt rules classifying types of violations as "low level" or "high level," as well as rules for aggravating and mitigating factors. The statutory requirements then direct certain sanctions based on those classifications and factors, as follows:

The DOC may arrest persons for violating conditions. If a violation constitutes a new criminal offense, the DOC must report the conduct to the local law enforcement agency or prosecuting attorney. The report functions as notice that the DOC will hold the person in confinement for no more than three days. However, for certain persons with qualifying underlying felony convictions, the DOC must hold the person in confinement for 30 days from the time of arrest or until a prosecuting attorney charges the person with a crime, whichever occurs first. Persons with the following underlying felony convictions are subject to those restrictions:

Summary:

Sanctions. The tiered sanction requirements for low-level violations are removed. Instead, any low-level violation may be sanctioned with either a nonconfinement sanction or up to three days of confinement.

The requirement for a sixth or subsequent low-level violation to be automatically sanctioned as a high-level violation is removed. Instead, the DOC has the discretion to treat a sixth or subsequent violation as a high-level violation, so long as the decision to elevate a violation complies with policies and rules established by the DOC. This allows the DOC to impose either low-level sanctions (up to three days of confinement) or high-level sanctions (up to 30 days of confinement, subject to a hearing).

The requirement for holding a person with a qualifying underlying felony conviction who commits a new crime while on community custody is modified. The person must be held in total confinement for 30 days, until the prosecuting attorney files new charges against the offender, or until the prosecuting attorney provides written notice to the DOC that new charges will not be filed, whichever is sooner. Therefore, the DOC must release the person when receiving notice that new charges will not be filed.

The DOC must track and collect data and information on violations of community custody conditions and the sanctions imposed for violations, which must include specified data points and trends. The DOC must annually report to the Governor and Legislature, beginning November 1, 2021.

Staffing. Subject to an appropriation, the DOC must contract with an independent third party to provide a comprehensive review of the community corrections staffing model and develop an updated staffing model for use by DOC. The updated model must include additional time and flexibility for community corrections officers to focus on case management, engagement, and interventions. The DOC must submit a report, including a summary of the review and update, to the Governor and Legislature by July 1, 2021.

Votes on Final Passage:

House

95

2

Senate

26

21

Effective:

June 11, 2020