SENATE BILL REPORT

ESSB 6261

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Passed Senate, February 18, 2020

Title: An act relating to strengthening the farm labor contractor system by removing an exemption for nonprofits, prohibiting retaliation and the use of farm labor contractors in certain circumstances, and establishing liability for related violations.

Brief Description: Strengthening the farm labor contractor system by removing an exemption for nonprofits.

Sponsors: Senate Committee on Labor & Commerce (originally sponsored by Senators McCoy, Saldaña, Conway, Kuderer, Hasegawa, Wilson, C., Das, Nguyen and Keiser).

Brief History:

Committee Activity: Labor & Commerce: 1/21/20, 2/03/20 [DPS, DNP, w/oRec].

Floor Activity:

Passed Senate: 2/18/20, 32-16.

Brief Summary of Engrossed First Substitute Bill

  • Removes the nonprofit organization exemption from the application of the farm labor contractor laws.

  • Modifies the definition of agricultural employee to include a person who has rendered personal services to, or under the direction of, an agricultural employer in connection with the employer's agricultural activities.

SENATE COMMITTEE ON LABOR & COMMERCE

Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 6261 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.

Signed by Senators Keiser, Chair; Conway, Vice Chair; Saldaña, Stanford and Wellman.

Minority Report: Do not pass.

Signed by Senators King, Ranking Member; Braun and Schoesler.

Minority Report: That it be referred without recommendation.

Signed by Senator Walsh.

Staff: Susan Jones (786-7404)

Background: Farm Labor Contractors. L&I licenses and regulates farm labor contractors. To be eligible for a farm labor contractor license, applicants must meet certain surety bond and insurance requirements. A farm labor contractor is any person who, for a fee, performs any farm labor contracting activity. Farm labor contracting activity includes:

Retaliation Prohibited. No farm labor contractor or agricultural employer may discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee because the employee has:

Joint Liability for Unlicensed Farm Labor Contractors. Any person who knowingly uses the services of an unlicensed farm labor contractor is personally, jointly, and severally liable with the person acting as a farm labor contractor to the same extent and in the same manner as provided under the law. Any user may rely upon either the license issued by L&I to the farm labor contractor or L&I's representation that such contractor is licensed as required.

Nonprofit Exemption. The farm labor contractor laws do not apply to a nonprofit corporation or organization which performs certain functions for its members where:

Agricultural employee. Agricultural employee means any person who renders personal services to, or under the direction of, an agricultural employer in connection with the employer's agricultural activity.

Summary of Engrossed First Substitute Bill: Nonprofit Exemption Removed. The nonprofit exemption is removed.

Agricultural employee. The definition of agricultural employee also includes any person who has rendered personal services to agricultural employer in connection with the employer's agricultural activity.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Creates Committee/Commission/Task Force that includes Legislative members: No.

Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony on Original Bill: The committee recommended a different version of the bill than what was heard. PRO: We worked this bill for the last couple of years. This bill is narrower than previous bills. We still have work to do. The funding is through the H-2A program. The federal funding has not grown with the growth of the number of workers.

The statute at issue was created in the 1950's and not updated since 1985 long before Washington became one of the largest users of the H-2A system. Our laws need to respond to the fact that a lot of our agricultural workforce is being imported using international labor contracting systems that did not exist when the law was formed. The H-2A program has systems that cripple the workers' ability to stand up for themselves. As retaliation, a lot of H-2As that are here are threatened with not rehiring or firing them. They exclude people from preferred hire lists. In a situation in Quincy, a group of workers raised an issue of unsafe working conditions and lack of breaks. Instead of correcting the problem, the employer and farm labor contractor told them to get back to work or to go home to Mexico. They did reach an agreement to get of rid of an abusive foreman and not to retaliate but the next year, the advocating workers were excluded from the preferred worker list.

We have seen how farm labor contractors have impacted our people. In one situation, there were over 100 workers who asked for information about a sick colleague. Instead of giving information, the company put them on the street with their bags. They forced them onto buses to the airport. The farm labor contractors were not taking care of their food and safety on the job. There was no process to complain. They bring workers to the U.S. with false promises. They are threatened with deportation.

A lot of workers suffer because of farm labor contractors. Just this summer, some workers harvesting blueberries got fired for asking for their paychecks. We helped them file an L&I claim. It took several weeks to get anything back from the farm labor contractor about the paychecks. If workers complained that there were no bathrooms, they were then told there was no more work. This is not true. There is work.

CON: The bill is labelled as strengthening the system but really makes the rules vague, unworkable and destroys due process for employers. There is a lot of work to be done on the language. We have concern about retaliation and the 90 day presumption. There are a lot of reasons not to rehire a worker. Some relate to the health and safety of all the workers. In the written testimony, they provided examples of abuse and threats, where it was no longer safe. Where there was substance abuse, it is not appropriate for them to operate heavy equipment or be around other employees at that point.

There are other ways to fix these problems. There is problem with farm labor contractors in an underground economy where people are paying laborers under the table. We turned in a contractor suspected of paying under the table. The contractor is no longer listed as a farm labor contractor. One thought is that instead of paying directly, they get paycheck stubs first. Maybe requiring farms to get paychecks stubs would protect workers.

This is not a narrow bill. It is not just an H-2A bill. The retaliation provisions apply to all agricultural employers. This is anti-American and against the system of justice. This is not the right approach for dealing with these matters.

The fiscal note are a misuse of the funds in those accounts. They are dedicated funds.

Persons Testifying: PRO: Senator John McCoy, Prime Sponsor; Andrea Schmitt, Columbia Legal Services; Ramon Torres, Familias Unidas por la Justicia; Marciano Sanchez, Familias Unidas por la Justicia. CON: Michael Gempler, Washington Growers League; Tom Kwieciak, WAFLA; Bob Battles, Association of Washington Business; Bre Elsey, Washington Farm Bureau; Scott Dilley, Dairy Federation.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: No one.