Local Carryout Bag Ordinances.
A number of municipalities in Washington have adopted ordinances addressing single-use plastic bags and other types of carryout bags. In addition to restricting single-use plastic bags, some local ordinances establish bag performance specifications and require a charge to be levied by grocers and other retail establishments for the provision of single-use paper or other carryout bags.
2020 Restrictions on Single-Use Carryout Bags.
Beginning January 1, 2021, retail establishments may not provide single-use plastic bags designed to be used once and disposed. Retail establishments are defined to include entities that sell or provide food, merchandise, goods, or materials directly to a customer, including home delivery and vendors operating at events. Food banks and food assistance programs are not retail establishments but are encouraged to reduce the use of single-use plastic bags. Retail establishments may provide the following types of carryout bags to customers:
Carryout bags do not include bags used inside stores by customers to:
Pass-through Charges on Carryout Bags.
Retail establishments must collect and retain from customers a pass-through charge of 8 cents for each:
This charge is a taxable retail sale and must be shown on customer receipts. However, retail establishments may deduct from business and occupation taxes the amounts collected from pass-through charges. This tax deduction is not subject to the tax preference performance statement or automatic expiration date. Retail establishments may not collect a pass-through charge from persons using vouchers or electronic benefit cards issued under the Women, Infants, and Children Nutrition Program, the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or the Food Assistance Program.
Enforcement of Carryout Bag Restrictions.
The Department of Ecology (Ecology) may adopt rules to implement, administer, and enforce the restrictions on carryout and in-store bags. Enforcement of bag restrictions must be largely on a complaint basis, and Ecology must establish a forum to receive complaints, which may include a telephone hotline, electronic social media strategy, or a form on Ecology's website. Local jurisdictions and other persons may file complaints using the forum, and local jurisdictions may review complaints filed with Ecology in order to support education and outreach to retail establishments by the local jurisdictions. Ecology, in collaboration with local jurisdictions, must provide education and outreach activities to inform retail establishments, consumers, and others. The civil penalties of up to $250 per violation of bag restrictions are appealable to the Pollution Control Hearings Board.
The 40 percent recycled content minimum requirement for paper carryout bags offered by retail establishments may be satisfied by any of the following three combinations of materials:
Paper carryout bags provided by retail establishments must display on the exterior of the bag either the recycled content or the wheat straw fiber content, or both.
The substitute bill makes the following changes to the original bill:
(In support) Agricultural waste products can be made into pulp for purposes of papermaking. Creating a market for leftover wheat straw will reduce the risk that farmers need to burn their agricultural residue. Allowing wheat straw fiber to be used in pulp for paper bags and to count towards minimum recycled content requirements will be an economic driver for using waste products in a beneficial way. Allowing wheat straw in paper bags will create jobs and support farmers. Using wheat straw used in paper bags has a smaller carbon footprint and is more water-efficient than tree-derived fiber. Wheat straw only has the potential to produce a small fraction of the fiber needed for carryout bags, and will never be a significant competitor to paper recycling.
(Other) Making better use of fiber from hay straw is a laudable intent. Washington is experiencing a recycling crisis, and this bill risks undercutting the market demand for recycled paper by providing an alternative that can be used in paper bag manufacturing. Allowing the use of nontree fiber to count towards minimum recycled content requirements for paper bags would make Washington's law inconsistent with other state laws governing recycled content.