Real Estate Brokers.
The Department of Licensing is responsible for licensing and regulating real estate brokers, who must meet minimum age, education, and experience requirements to obtain a license to perform real estate brokerage services on behalf of a licensed real estate firm. Performing real estate brokerage services includes, but is not limited to, rendering the following services directly or indirectly on another's behalf for compensation: (1) listing, selling, purchasing, or renting real estate; (2) negotiating or offering to negotiate the purchase, sale, or lease of real estate; (3) advising buyers, sellers, landlords, or tenants in connection with real estate; and (4) advertising oneself to the public as engaging in such services.
A broker is an "agent" when the broker enters into an agency relationship with a buyer or seller to perform real estate brokerage services, which relationship may be created by written agreement or statute. Regardless of whether a broker is an agent, a broker owes to all parties to whom the broker renders real estate brokerage services certain duties, which may not be waived, including:
A recent Washington State Court of Appeals case, Falcon Properties, LLC v. Bowfits 1308, LLC, stated that the statutory duties of real estate brokers apply only to the broker's own client, not to other parties in a transaction.
A real estate broker who renders real estate brokerage services owes statutory duties to all parties, rather than to all parties to whom the broker renders real estate brokerage services.
(In support) Purchasing a home is one of the largest investments a person can make, and House Bill 2059 helps to better guide and protect the public. Both aspects of this bill are important to consumer protections.
The court decision in Bowfits v. Falcon undermined protections intended by agency law for consumers when it ruled that minimum agency law duties are owed only to a party represented by a broker. That was not the intention of that language or what the industry teaches to brokers regarding the meaning of the language.
The more difficult issue is the notion of "love letters." In a strong seller's market, buyers are increasingly motivated to make their offers competitive. "Love letters" are a double-edged sword, as they can easily lead to the possibility that a seller may end up violating the Fair Housing Act in the process of selecting a buyer. There are numerous Fair Housing Act allegations and violations each year in the hundreds of real estate transactions that occur, and when there is a fair housing allegation, no one wins and it is an extremely unpleasant issue for everyone involved.
Oregon was the first to enact this type of legislation, and the language in House Bill 2059 was crafted intentionally by defining what is perceived to be the concept of a "love letter" and then banning them. The language is narrow because it tries to avoid a free speech issue. The more important language is language providing that a seller has the authority to instruct a broker not to present love letters to the seller prior to mutual acceptance. This allows a seller to avoid a Fair Housing Act violation by simply instructing parties that there will be no love letters. Images or pictures were not included in the definition of buyer unfair practice letter and should be included.
(Opposed) None.