The Fish and Wildlife Commission has authority to enter into agreements with a variety of entities, including the federal government or its agencies, regarding fish, shellfish, and wildlife-oriented recreation, as well as the propagation, protection, conservation, and control of fish, shellfish, and wildlife. Certain federal agencies may require indemnification language in their contracts. For example, the United States Army Corps of Engineers requires indemnification for damages arising from the design, construction, and operation of aquatic ecosystem restoration projects. Indemnity may be included as a clause in contracts in which the actions or mistakes of one party may result in the other party being liable for damages. In most contracts, an indemnification clause serves to compensate a party for harm or loss arising in connection with the other party's actions or failure to act.
The Fish and Wildlife Commission may indemnify the United States and its agencies as a condition to secure federal funds for fish, shellfish, and wildlife projects.
(In support) Congress authorized about $300 million in federal funding for Puget Sound restoration projects, including the Duckabush project. The Army Corps of Engineers requires indemnification clauses in their contracts to enter into agreements to receive federal funding in every state. This would not mean that the Army Corps of Engineers would not pay for their own mistakes, and indemnification would not obligate the state to match federal funds. This bill is narrowly tailored to ensure federal funding may be secured for fish and wildlife projects.
(Opposed) None.