State Environmental Policy Act.
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) establishes a review process for state and local governments to identify environmental impacts that may result from governmental decisions, such as the issuance of permits or the adoption of land-use plans. The SEPA environmental review process involves a project proponent or the lead agency completing an environmental checklist to identify and evaluate probable environmental impacts. If an initial review of the checklist and supporting documents results in a determination that the government decision has a probable significant adverse environmental impact (threshold determination), the proposal must undergo a more comprehensive environmental analysis in the form of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
Under SEPA, a government agency is designated as the lead agency and in that role is assigned responsibility for complying with SEPA's procedural requirements, including making a threshold determination and preparing the EIS when one is required.
State Environmental Policy Act Exemptions.
Under SEPA laws and in SEPA rules adopted by the Department of Ecology (Ecology), certain projects or activities are exempt from SEPA requirements.
State Environmental Policy Act laws:
State Environmental Policy Act rules:
State of Emergency Declarations by Local Governments.
Political subdivisions of Washington have the authority to declare emergencies or disasters, which are events or sets of circumstances which demand immediate action to preserve public health, protect life, protect public property, or provide relief to any stricken community. Political subdivisions may enter into contracts and incur obligations necessary to combat disasters, protect health and safety, and may provide for emergency assistance without regard to time-consuming procedures and formalities prescribed by law, including budget law, the appropriation and expenditure of funds, public work provisions, and contracting requirements.
Additional, separate emergency management authorities are also provided to local governments under state law. Cities with a population of over 300,000 have authority to maintain an emergency fund from which to expend money, by an ordinance approved by two-thirds of council members, to meet obligations or expenses from happenings that could not have been anticipated, including fire, flood, and other specified events. Smaller cities and towns may also spend money, through the adoption of an ordinance approved by two thirds of council members, on similar unanticipated happenings of an emergency. Counties may spend money upon the happening of an emergency upon a unanimous vote of county commissioners to adopt an emergency resolution.
At least three cities (Seattle, Olympia, and Tacoma) and two counties (King and Jefferson) in Washington have issued determinations of an emergency related to persons experiencing homelessness within the past few years. Under a statutory authority that is distinct from the statutory authority which authorizes local governments to declare an emergency, the Board of Health of at least one county (Thurston) has also declared homelessness to be a public health crisis.
Until August 1, 2032, permit actions to site a temporary shelter or transitional encampment are exempt from compliance SEPA review requirements if 13 conditions are met. Temporary shelters are defined as uses sited in a new or existing structure or modular structure that provides temporary quarters for sleeping and shelter and may include common food preparation, shower, or other facilities. Transitional encampments are defined as uses having tents, modular structures, vehicles, or similar shelters that provide temporary quarters for sleeping and shelter, including common food preparation, shower, or other commonly used facilities that are separate from the sleeping shelters. In order to be exempt from SEPA review requirements:
If a facility is located within a quarter of a mile of another county, city, or town: