State Student Loan Programs. Washington had two laws granting the state the authority to develop student loan programs. In 2007, the Washington Higher Education Facilities Authority (WHEFA) was granted permission to issue taxable and tax-exempt bonds to acquire or originate student loans. The law prohibits the state from guaranteeing the loans. The WHEFA never used the authority because the auction-rate security market in which student loan bonds were issued ended in 2007. In 2010 the federal government changed the Stafford Loan program to the Direct Loan program, and the federal government began administering the loans itself rather than using a private entity. Without a state guarantee or a significant reserve fund, the WHEFA found that the interest rate on the state student loans would not be competitive with the federal Direct Loan program.
In 2009 the Higher Education Loan Program (HELP) was created to issue low-interest educational loans and was to be administered by the Washington Student Achievement Council (WSAC). The program was never funded, and it was repealed in 2019.
The state has established and funded smaller loan programs for specific fields. For example, WSAC administers the Aerospace Training Student Loan Program and provides student loan repayment under the Washington Health Corps.
WSAC, in consultation with the Office of the State Treasurer and the State Investment Board (SIB) must design a student loan program. At a minimum, the program design must include:
WSAC may recommend contracting with one or more state-based financial institutions for loan origination and servicing.
WSAC, in consultation with the treasurer and SIB must include an analysis of the sustainability of the program design.
A report is due to the Governor and the Legislature by December 1, 2022.
PRO: Federal student loans can run you 7, 8, or 9 percent interest and you may be paying them for many years. We are working to not burden students with debt but sometimes you just need a loan. One percent is an absolutely fabulous interest rate to be able to continue your education. We know that when students are empowered to attend and persist in higher education they thrive. We are encouraged by the creative thinking behind this bill. When I was a community college student I took out a high interest emergency loan at 9 percent. It presented a major barrier and I considered not continuing my education. I've needed graduate student loans to pay tuition, fees, expenses, and even for car repairs. I'm prohibited in my graduate program from working so student loans are the only way I can address unexpected expenses.
The committee recommended a different version of the bill than what was heard. PRO: We believe that no student should have to take on a lifetime of debt to afford college. As a student, when I had a financial crisis, my only option was to take out a private student loan with a 9 percent interest rate.