Office of Equity Task Force. In 2019, the Legislature directed the Governor's Interagency Coordinating Council on Health Disparities (Council) to convene and staff an Office of Equity Task Force (Task Force) to develop a proposal for the creation of the Washington State Office of Equity (Office).
The Task Force final proposal, submitted to the Legislature in October 2020, recommended that the Office:
Office of Equity. In July 2020, the Legislature created the Office to promote access to equitable opportunities and resources that reduce disparities and improve outcomes statewide across all sectors of government. The work of the Office must be guided by principles of equity. The Office must facilitate state policy and systems change to promote equitable policies, practices, and outcomes through:
By October 31, 2022, and every year thereafter, the Office must report to the Governor and the Legislature summarizing the work of the Office, agency compliance with Office standards and performance measures, and an equity analysis of the Board.
Washington State Institute for Public Policy. The Washington State Institute for Public Policy (WSIPP) was created by the Legislature in 1983 as a nonpartisan organization that carries out research at the direction of the Legislature or the WSIPP Board of Directors. The board of directors is comprised of 16 members that represent the Legislature, the Excutive Branch, and the academic community. Fiscal and administrative services for WSIPP are provided by The Evergreen State College.
Office of Equity. The director of the Office must be appointed based on recommendations provided by the Board. The Board must screen applicants and provide a list recommending three or more candidates to the Governor. The Governor may select from the list, ask the Board to add additional names, or reject the entire list an ask the Board to submit three additional candidates.
The Office must include recommendations to reduce barriers for community participation on boards and commissions in the October 31, 2022 report to the Governor and the Legislature.
The Office may adopt rules as necessary to:
Community Advisory Board. The Board is created to advise the Office on its priorities and timelines and provide guidance on standards and performance measures. The Director appoints members to the Board. The Board must consist of no more than 20 voting members that support a diverse representation by geography and identity and include, but are not limited to, a representative of:
Members of the Board are entitled to compensation and reimbursement for travel expenses.
State Agencies. All agencies must:
Washington State Institute for Public Policy. The Legislature directs WSIPP to evaluate the implementation of the Office and report to the Governor and appropriate committees of the Legislature by October 31, 2025. The report must include:
The committee recommended a different version of the bill than what was heard. PRO: This bill is a trailer bill for the bill that was passed last year and partially vetoed. The establishment of the Office was preemptive of the Task Force work. After last session the Task Force finalized its recommendations which were well rounded. This bill stays, as true as possible, to the recommendations of the Task Force and puts some meat on the bones of the skeleton that was created last year. Funding and tasking the Office is included in the Governor's policy goals and budget. The bill would not go into effect until June and so any current hiring should not be impacted by this legislation.
CON: With I-200 the voters said that they want the government to treat everyone equally and not discriminate against or give preferential treatment to anyone based on race, color, sex, ethnicity or national origin. I-1000 a year or two ago tried to reverse that. One of the provisions in that initiative the voters rejected was the creation of an Office like this. This bill is in direct contradiction to what the voters said they wanted at a cost of $2.1 million of taxpayer money.
OTHER: The Governor is a strong proponent for creating the Office but has three concerns regarding the bill. The Governor is close to appointing the director for the Office and wants to ensure that the appointment will not be invalidated by the law. This is a cabinet position which traditionally allows for the Governor to have full authority and discretion over the hiring and firing of the individual and is typically not preselected by a community advisory group. The Governor would prefer that the evaluation of the Office be done by an outside entity rather than an agency within the executive branch. Rulemaking is not generally done for establishing requirements for another agency.