When the Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) determines there is a permanent or temporary total disability from a workers' compensation injury, a worker receives monthly payments during the period of the disability, as follows:
| No. of the Worker's Children | % of the Worker's Wages if the Worker is Married | % of the Worker's Wages if the Worker is Unmarried |
| 0 | 65% | 60% |
| 1 | 67% | 62% |
| 2 | 69% | 64% |
| 3 | 71% | 66% |
| 4 | 73% | 68% |
| 5 or more | 75% | 70% |
The term "child" means every natural born child, posthumous child, stepchild, child legally adopted prior to the injury, child born after the injury where conception occurred prior to the injury, and dependent child in the legal custody and control of the worker, all while under the age of 18 years, or under the age of 23 years while permanently enrolled at a full time course in an accredited school, and over the age of 18 years if the child is a dependent as a result of a disability.
A married worker receives an additional $10 per month when the worker is receiving the minimum monthly payments for a permanent or temporary total disability.
The percentages of the worker's wages to be received by an injured unmarried worker for a permanent or temporary total disability are the same as a married worker.
An unmarried worker also receives an additional $10 per month when the worker is receiving the minimum monthly payments for a permanent or temporary total disability.
PRO: This came up last year on another bill. The idea that if you are a single parent and you were permanently disabled you would get a smaller percentage of your wages is confusing since single parents don’t have that extra support and the expenses to support your family are not less. This is a narrowly focused bill. There shouldn’t be a penalty for being unmarried. This will improve conditions for unmarried injured workers. There was a work group convened to look at wages. This issue was one of the reasons the workgroup was convened. When determining the time loss calculations, they should be done with care, looking at the impacts on injured workers.
CON: If there was a problem with the level of benefits, L&I would be leading the charge for the change. There are other problems to address, like the premiums for the COLA rather than regular industrial insurance. This is paid even if the employer hasn’t had a claim. This issue should be studied before a change.
This may have a large fiscal note. The average percentage is around 63 percent of wages. If it is increased to 65 percent, this will increase the cost to employers and employees at a time when we are looking for relief for employers and employees. This unwinds one part of a very complicated system. The benefit accuracy work group studied these issues for four years. The bill creates winners and losers. This is a vast increase in benefits. A uniform percentage should be available for all workers. This will add a significant cost. Self-insurers pay this cost directly. There needs to be a larger solution. We should go back and have a robust discussion on the larger picture.
OTHER: This may be estimated a 3 percent to 3.5 percent increase in wages. There will be a fiscal note.