The Sentencing Guidelines Commission (SGC) serves to advise the Governor and the Legislature as necessary on issues relating to adult and juvenile sentencing. The SGC consists of 20 voting members. Aside from ex officio members who are appointed by virtue of their positions in state government, voting members are appointed to three-year terms by the Governor and are subject to confirmation by the Senate. In making appointments, the Governor must endeavor to assure that the SGC membership includes adequate representation and expertise relating to both the adult criminal justice system and juvenile justice system.
The SGC's voting membership includes:
The SGC also includes four legislators serving two-year terms as nonvoting members, one from each of the two largest caucuses in each chamber.
Five members are added to the Sentencing Guidelines Commission (SGC) as follows:
When appointing the academic research expert, the Governor must seek recommendations of the Washington State Institute for Public Policy and relevant departments of Washington State University and the University of Washington.
The membership requirements for the public members of the SGC are changed. The Governor must appoint a member of the public who has been formerly incarcerated in the state correctional system as one of the four voting membership positions in the SGC that are for members of the public who are not prosecutors, defense attorneys, judges, or law enforcement officers. The member who must be a crime victims advocate may also be a victim of crime.
The Governor shall stagger the initial terms of the member representing the interests of tribes, the member who serves as a behavioral health professional with experience working in the criminal justice system, and the member with knowledge of and expertise in academic research in the field of criminology or sociology by appointing one of them for a term of one year, one of them for a term of two years, and one of them for a term of three years.
(In support) It is important to have a multiplicity of voices at the table when discussing sentencing. The need to have a diversity of voices particularly applies to voices that have been underrepresented in the past on the SGC like the tribes and academics. It is vital that the individuals who are most affected by sentencing guidelines have a voice in their development. Lived experience is valuable to the SGC and the community when it come to sentencing recommendations.
(Opposed) None.