Water Rights General Adjudications.
The state's Surface Water Code establishes a general adjudication procedure. An adjudication can determine rights to surface water, ground water, or both. Holders of water rights or watershed planning units may petition the Department of Ecology (Ecology) to start an adjudication, or Ecology may start an adjudication at its own discretion. Such a proceeding is conducted in a superior court with Ecology as the plaintiff, and the defendants being the persons or entities owning real property situated within the area to be adjudicated that do not receive their water from municipal water providers, and all known persons claiming a right to the water sought to be determined.
Water Rights General Adjudications—Commencement.
Ecology begins the adjudication process by preparing a statement of the facts, together with a plan or map of the locality under investigation. Ecology files that statement, along with the plan or map, in the superior court of the county in which the water is located. The statement includes information about the water rights to be adjudicated, such as the identification of persons or entities owning real property situated within the area to be adjudicated that do not receive their water from municipal water providers, the identification of all known persons claiming a right to the water sought to be determined, and a brief statement of the facts in relation to the water.
Once the statement and map have been filed, the judge of the superior court issues an order directing summons to be issued and identifies the date by which the summons must be returned. The summons must contain a brief statement of the objects and purpose of the proceedings and must require parties with water right claims to appear on the return day thereof, and to make and file an adjudication claim to the water involved. The summons must also state that unless parties appear at the stated time and place and assert their water right claim, a judgment will be entered determining their rights according to the evidence before the court.
Service of the summons in a water rights adjudication may either be by personal service or certified mail. The summons must be served at least 60 days before the required return date of the summons and the return date must be between 100 and 130 days after the order.
On or before the date specified in the summons, each defendant must file with the clerk of the superior court an adjudication claim on a form and in a manner provided by Ecology, and mail or email a copy to Ecology.
Within the date set by the court for filing evidence, each defendant must file with the court evidence to support the defendant's adjudication claims. The court is encouraged to set a date for filing evidence that is reasonable and fair for the timely processing of the adjudication. After that date, except for good cause, a defendant may not file additional evidence to support the claim.
Water Rights General Adjudications—Rules of Procedure.
The rules of procedure for a superior court apply to a water rights adjudication, except that a superior court may choose to adopt simplified procedures for claimants of small uses of water.
Water Resources Inventory Areas.
Ecology and other state natural resources agencies have divided Washington into 62 numbered Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIAs) to delineate the state's major watersheds. The Nooksack watershed is WRIA 1.
For a water rights adjudication filed in Water Resource Inventory Area 1 after June 1, 2023:
(In support) The Department of Ecology is planning to file an adjudication in the Nooksack watershed in the next year. The bill includes specific timelines so people can adequately prepare for the adjudication. The bill does not make any substantive changes.
The bill provides clarity, as well as an opportunity to remove some internal conflicts in the Surface Water Code. The bill provides certainty for the parties. Without the clarity in the bill, there are some internal conflicts in the statute that could lead to confusion.
(Opposed) None.
(Other) The courts already have the authority to establish the timelines set forth in the bill. It is good that the bill provides assurance to water rights claimants.