In 1986, the Legislature established the Credit Services Organizations Act. A credit service organization (CSO) is regarded as a business that charges fees to customers in an effort to obtain an extension of credit, improve a person's credit rating or prevent foreclosure of a mortgage or security agreement. Under the CSO Act, a CSO means any person who, with respect to the extension of credit by others, sells, provides, performs, or represents that they can or will sell, provide, or perform, in return for the payment of money or other valuable consideration any of the following services:
CSOs are not:
Prohibited Actions. Under this chapter CSOs are prohibited from the following activities:
Information Statements and Notice of Cancellation. Prior to the execution of a contract between a buyer and a CSO, the CSO must provide a buyer with an information statement. This information statement must include:
Each contract for purchase services must include a notice of cancellation. A buyer has the right to cancel the contract at any time prior to midnight of the fifth day after the transaction.
Narrowing the Exemption for Attorneys from the Definition of Credit Services Organization. The exemption for attorneys from the definition of CSOs is narrowed by removing the exemption for law practices that primarily work with consumers to improve their credit rating, or assist consumers in obtaining an extension of credit. These type of law practices would be considered CSOs with this definitional change.
Additional Prohibited Credit Services Organization Actions. CSOs are prohibited from failing to provide a monthly statement to a consumer that details the services the CSO has performed on their behalf. This includes an accounting of any funds paid by a consumer and held or disbursed on the consumer's behalf.
The list of entities the CSO may not counsel or advise consumers to make untrue or misleading statements to is expanded to include creditors, collection agencies, and regulatory entities. CSOs cannot advise a consumer to submit a dispute without a good faith belief in the accuracy of the dispute.
CSOs are prohibited from sending communications to a consumer reporting agency, creditor, collection agency or regulatory entity without authorization from the consumer. CSOs cannot fail to make written communication sent on behalf of a consumer to the consumer.
It is not allowed to be considered a service of a CSO when a CSO seeks to obtain a credit report and the performance of other services necessary to determine the needs of a consumer for the reinvestigation of any accounts.
Communication Obligations of Consumer Reporting Agencies, Creditors, or Collection Agencies to a Credit Service Organization. If a consumer reporting agency, creditor, or collection agency knows that a consumer is represented by a CSO, they are permitted to communicate with that CSO unless:
A consumer reporting agency, creditor, or collection agency is not required to communicate with a CSO if:
Identity Theft Prevention. CSOs are directed to redact personal information of the consumer unless inclusion of the information is required by law. This includes:
Credit Service Organization Recordkeeping Requirements. The period of time a CSO must maintain a file for a consumer is extended from two years to four years following the completion or termination of the CSO agreement.
Contents of the Information Statement. The information statement must include in 10 point type at the top of the statement an outline of how a CSO will work on behalf of a consumer. The notice will also include a statement directing consumers to reach out to the Office of the Attorney General if they have a complaint about fees charged by the CSO. The statement will also include the consumer's rights under federal and state law.
Credit Service Organization Contract Requirements. Contracts between a CSO and a consumer must include explicit written approval from the consumer that the CSO may use the consumer's signature to facilitate credit repair services. The duration of time under which a CSO provides a consumer credit services is limited to 180 days.
The "Notice of Cancellation" component of the contract is updated to provide for electronic means of communication as a way of cancelling. The duration of time a consumer has to cancel is modified to provide for midnight on the fifth day after the contract is executed. CSOs are required to provide cancellation instructions on its website that are easily understood and provide easily exercised cancellation instructions.
Attorney Fees. In case of an action by a consumer against a CSO, damages must be awarded in an amount not less than the amount of money the consumer paid to the CSO.
PRO: The problem we are trying to solve is having more transparency for consumers. These services help consumers improve their credit. It is stunning that these organizations can sign someone's name on their behalf. They shouldn't sign my name on my behalf when they have power of attorney. This process needs to be fully disclosed to the consumer. This would build a better relationship between CSO's and consumers. There is an epidemic of bad actors in the credit repair organizations space with some of them charging excessive costs back to the consumer. The bill prohibits repeated challenges on accounts that are frivolous. This bill provides reasonable protections that all good actors can follow. All businesses should treat people with honesty and transparency. This bill has a wide range of supporters. Letters have misspellings of names and it is often done on purpose. This makes it take longer to resolve an issue, which means more monthly fees for nefarious actors that profit from drawing these processes out.
CON: Our company has to sign on behalf of people because of federal law not allowing third parties. This bill makes it harder for consumers to contest account issues, and CSOs to operate efficiently. New contracts have to be redone every 180 days. 1 in 5 Americans have an error on their credit report. The average American cannot navigate credit bureau policies. Attorneys doing the same work should all be treated the same under the law.