Growth Management Act. The Growth Management Act (GMA) is the comprehensive land use planning framework for counties and cities in Washington. The GMA establishes land-use designation and environmental protection requirements for all Washington counties and cities. The GMA also establishes a significantly wider array of planning duties for 28 counties, and the cities within those counties, that are obligated to satisfy all planning requirements of the GMA. These jurisdictions are sometimes said to be fully planning under the GMA.
Counties that fully plan under the GMA must designate urban growth areas (UGAs), within which urban growth must be encouraged and outside of which growth may occur only if it is not urban in nature. Each city in a county must be included in a UGA. Planning jurisdictions must include within their UGAs sufficient areas and densities to accommodate projected urban growth for the succeeding 20-year period.
The GMA also directs fully planning jurisdictions to adopt internally consistent comprehensive land use plans. Comprehensive plans are implemented through locally adopted development regulations, and both the plans and the local regulations are subject to review and revision requirements prescribed in the GMA. Comprehensive plans must be reviewed and, if necessary, revised every ten years to ensure that it complies with the GMA. When developing their comprehensive plans, counties and cities must consider various goals set forth in statute.
Each comprehensive plan must include a plan, scheme, or design for certain enumerated elements, including a mandatory housing element. The housing element must ensure the vitality and character of established residential neighborhoods and among other requirements consider the role of accessory dwelling units in meeting housing needs.
Accessory Dwelling Units. Any county fully planning under the GMA, city with a population over 20,000, or county with a population over 125,000 must have accessory dwelling unit (ADU) provisions incorporated in their development regulations, zoning regulations, or official controls. These provisions must be consistent with a 1993 report from the Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development that provided recommendations to encourage the development and placement of ADUs in areas zoned for single-family residential use. However, local communities have some flexibility to adapt these recommendations to local needs and preferences.
As of July 1, 2021, fully planning cities under the GMA may not require the provision of off-street parking for ADUs within a quarter mile of a major transit stop, such as a high capacity transportation system stop, a rail stop, or certain bus stops, unless the city determines that on-street parking is infeasible for the ADU.
An ADU is a residential living unit providing independent living facilities and permanent provisions for sleeping, cooking, sanitation, and living on the same lot as a single-family home, duplex, triplex, townhome, or other housing unit. A short-term rental is a lodging use, outside of a hotel, motel, or bed and breakfast, in which a room is offered for a fee for fewer than 30 consecutive nights.
Accessory Dwelling Units—General Requirements. A city or county fully planning under the GMA must adopt or amend by ordinance, and incorporate into their development regulations, zoning regulations, and other official controls all of the following policies to take effect six months after the jurisdiction's next periodic comprehensive plan update:
A city or county may impose a limit of two accessory dwelling units, in addition to the principal unit, on a residential lot of 2000 square feet or less.
These provisions do not apply to lots designated with critical areas or their buffers, or to a watershed serving as a reservoir for potable water if that watershed is or was listed as impaired or threatened under the United States Clean Water Act.
Incentives. A city or county may adopt ordinances, development regulations, and other official controls that waive or defer fees, including impact fees, defer the payment of taxes, or waive specific regulations. A city or county may only offer such reduced or deferred fees, deferred taxes, waivers, or other incentives for the development or construction of ADUs if:
Accessory Dwelling Units Guidance Recommendations. The Department of Commerce (Commerce) must revise its recommendations for encouraging ADUs to include the provisions in this act no later than December 31, 2023. During each comprehensive plan review, Commerce must review local government comprehensive plans and development regulations for compliance with this act and the recommendations provided by Commerce.
Applicability of Provisions. A fully planning city or county must adopt or amend by ordinance, and incorporate into their development regulations, zoning regulations, and other official controls the ADU requirements established by this act to take effect six months after the jurisdiction's next periodic comprehensive plan update. Any conflicting development regulations are preempted and superseded after this deadline.
Nothing in this act requires or authorizes a city or county to authorize the construction of an ADU in a location where development is restricted under other laws, rules, or ordinances as a result of physical proximity to on-site sewage system infrastructure, critical areas, or other unsuitable physical characteristics of a property.
Nothing in this act prohibits a city or county from:
The ordinances, development regulations, and other official controls adopted or amended in accordance with these requirements must only apply to the portions of towns, cities, and counties within UGAs. Attached or detached ADUs may not be considered as contributing to the overall underlying density within the UGA boundary of a county.
Liability. Declarations or governing documents governing condominiums, homeowners' associations, and common interest communities created after the effective date of the act may not prohibit the construction, development, or use of an ADU within a UGA unless such declarations or governing documents were created to protect public health and safety, and ground and surface waters from on-site wastewater. A city or county that issues a permit for the construction of an ADU may not be held civilly liable on the basis that the construction would violate the restrictive covenant or deed restriction created after the effective date of the act.
Any action taken by a city or county to comply with the above policies is not subject to legal challenge under the Growth Management Hearings Board or the State Environmental Policy Act.
Accessory Dwelling Units—Definitions. Terms, including gross floor area and principal unit are defined.
Statutes Repealed. Statutes pertaining to accessory apartments are repealed.
The committee recommended a different version of the bill than what was heard. PRO: This bill has strong support from the House and has been worked on over the course of the last five years. We need at least one million additional housing units in the next 20 years and this bill provides housing options for families with aging parents or families wanting to downsize. These policies are part of the suite of housing policies the Legislature is considering this session. The differences between this bill and a similar ADU Senate bill (SB 5235) are differences in the provisions regarding owner occupancy requirements, parking mandates, impact fees, and maximum amount of ADUs per lot. California recently implemented legislation similar to this bill and as of last year, one in every seven new homes permitted in the state is an ADU, and one in every four new homes permitted in the City of Los Angeles is an ADU. The City of Seattle recently adopted similar provisions, and their ADU permit applications are up by a factor of three in comparison to recent years. This bill addresses the largest barriers to ADU construction.
CON: There are many housing and land use policies before the Senate that need to be integrated for them to be implementable. The Senate ADU bill is preferred to this bill because it is less prescriptive on minor development regulations and provides greater flexibility for parking requirements. The GMA already requires cities and counties to consider all housing types, including ADUs, when meeting their housing targets. This bill would encourage growth outside urban boundaries, thereby putting the responsibility of providing additional infrastructure to the units on existing homeowners and residents.
OTHER: There are concerns about how this bill will interact with the other housing policies the Legislature is considering this session, specifically the middle housing bill and transit oriented development bill (SB 5466). There are also concerns about the overly prescriptive nature of the development regulations on ADUs under this bill, and it's unclear how ADUs sited at a lot line would be in compliance with the state building code and energy code, as well as the International Fire Code. The bill also needs to address how utilities are provided in the case an ADU is sold as a condo under the provisions of the bill.