State Energy Performance Standard. In 2019, the Legislature enacted the Clean Buildings Act, which required the Department of Commerce (Commerce) to establish by rule a State Energy Performance Standard (Standard). The Standard seeks to maximize reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from the building sector. The Standard includes energy use intensity targets by building type, and methods of conditional compliance that include an energy management plan, operations and maintenance program, energy efficiency audits, and investments in energy efficiency measures designed to meet the targets.
Tier 1 covered buildings, also referred to as covered commercial buildings, must comply with the Standard. Tier 1 buildings include existing buildings where the sum of nonresidential, hotel, motel, and dormitory floor areas exceed 50,000 gross square feet, excluding the parking garage area. Compliance with the Standard, and reporting for Tier 1 buildings is tiered, and begins June 2026, for buildings greater than 220,000 square feet.
Industrial Symbiosis Projects. Industrial symbiosis is the use by one company or sector of waste resources from another. Waste resources are broadly defined to include waste, by-products, residues, energy, water, logistics, capacity, expertise, equipment, and materials. In 2021, Commerce was directed to establish an industrial waste coordination program to provide expertise, technical assistance, and best practices to support local industrial symbiosis projects.
Campus District Energy System. A campus district energy system is a district energy system that provides heating, cooling, or heating and cooling to three or more buildings with more than 100,000 square feet of combined conditioned space, where the system and all connected buildings are owned by:
A state campus district energy system is a campus district energy system with five or more buildings where the system and connected buildings are owned by the state of Washington or by a public-private partnership including one public buildings owner and one private entity.
Decarbonization Plan. The owner of a state campus district energy system must develop a decarbonization plan (plan) and consult with their electric utility during plan development. The plan must provide a strategy for up to 15 years, or longer if approved by Commerce. The owner of a state campus district energy system must begin developing a plan by June 30, 2024, submit a final plan to Commerce by June 30, 2025, and submit a progress report on the implementation of the plan every five years thereafter.
Commerce must provide a summary report on plans to the Governor and Legislature by December 1, 2025.
The plan must include:
The owner of a state campus district energy system is encouraged to include in a plan:
Alternative Compliance Pathway to the State Energy Performance Standard. The owner of a state campus district energy system is not required to meet the energy use intensity target for the system and for all buildings connected to the system, conduct an investment grade audit, or to comply with the requirements of the Standard, if the owner of the system:
These conditions apply to both the system and all its connected buildings.
Non-state owned campus district energy systems may opt into this process to achieve an alternative compliance pathway, provided the owner of the campus district energy system submits a request to the Commerce, and that request is approved.
Under the alternative compliance pathway to the Standard, the owner of a state campus district energy system may not be required to implement more than one energy management plan and more than one operations and maintenance plan for the campus.
Commerce must also guarantee that a state campus district energy system and all its connected buildings are in compliance with any requirements for campus buildings to implement energy efficiency measures (EEMs) identified in an energy audit if the energy audit demonstrates that energy savings from the system's EEMs will be greater than the EEMs for the campus buildings, and the system implements the EEMs.
PRO: Washington has over a dozen campus district energy systems with a central heating plant and multiple buildings around the campus. These systems are the biggest energy users under the state's management, a big part of the state's carbon footprint, and in many cases have a significant deferred maintenance backlog. Upgrading these systems is one of our biggest opportunity to reduce carbon footprint while reducing operating and maintenance costs. This bill proposes how to plan out upgrading systems over time, realize economies of scale, and develop public-private partnerships to reduce costs. After planning is done, these systems can provide an alternate opportunity to comply with the Clean Buildings Act.
PRO: We should treat these buildings comprehensively because they are different than having a boiler in the basement of one building. The bill is open to some private owners, but is not the right vehicle for thermal energy utilities. We need to do this work and doing it systemically makes sense. The bill streamlines compliance, saves operational costs, and allows for one energy management plan. Decarbonizing is hard but this bill helps us get there. As we transition to cleaner energy sources, it is important we do so intentionally to understand how it impacts our supply capacity, resources, economy, and labor force. We believe this bill ensures that consideration of the workers is built in. This is an intelligent approach to ensure the proper plans with timelines are established to address the combined energy efficiencies of energy systems alongside buildings. The bill takes care of the unintended consequence of the Clean Buildings Act, which is good for single buildings but does not address connected buildings; calls out industrial symbiosis, which is finding ways of sharing energy; and includes public-private partnerships, which to convert buildings is going to take billions of dollars.
OTHER: The building sector is the second largest emitter of greenhouse gas emissions in the state. Energy efficiency and electrification are two of the most cost-effective strategies for decarbonizing buildings.