A court may order the forfeiture of a firearm when it is proven the firearm was:
The court must order the return of a seized firearm if the court finds there is not probable cause to believe a violation occurred or the criminal proceedings are dismissed. Any firearm not ordered to be destroyed or held as evidence by a court may be disposed of in any manner determined by the local legislative authority who may keep any proceed of the auction or trade of the firearm.
Firearms may also be forfeited as unclaimed property if the owner does not claim the firearm within a certain period of time after being notified by the local agency. However, any illegal or unsafe firearms must be destroyed. Any other firearm may by retained and used by the law enforcement agency for a period of one year at which point the firearm must be disposed of as any other forfeited firearm.
Firearms classified as antiques, curios, relics, or firearms of particular historical significance must be auctioned to a licensed dealer.
Forfeited firearms in possession of the Washington State Patrol (WSP) on or after May 7, 1993, that are not held as evidence must be disposed of as follows:
In addition to auctioning or trading forfeited firearms to licensed dealers, WSP may destroy retained firearms. Destruction of a firearm means melting or shredding all parts of the firearm. Firearms classified as antiques, curios, relics, or firearms of particular historical significance may be auctioned or traded to museums or historical societies.
Any firearm in the possession of a state or local government entity or law enforcement agency that is obtained through a firearm buyback program must be destroyed unless the firearm is:
Any state or local government entity or law enforcement agency that is conducting a firearm buy-back program must establish procedures for returning stolen firearms to their rightful owners and determining if a firearm has been used in the commission of a crime.
PRO: Washington State should not be in the business of selling arms. The Washington State Patrol currently does not have the permission to destroy forfeited weapons in their custody. So this legislation simply gives the Washington State Patrol the same permission that every other law enforcement agency in the state already has. The other aspect of the bill is to require buyback programs to destroy guns that are collected. The person who brings their gun to a buyback program wants it out of circulation. They want it gone to keep themselves in their community happy and safe. Any confiscated guns are re-circulated. Currently, the state patrol's sole option is to trade firearms to dealers. This bill would allow the Washington State Patrol the same level of flexibility as local law enforcement agencies have and empower them to destroy weapons and help stop the deadly life cycle of these guns. While addressing gun violence in our communities cannot be solved with one approach or one House Bill, there's one thing that destroying a gun that is turned in during a gun buyback program can guarantee, that that gun will never be used in a future act of violence or suicide. The families of all law enforcement want their loved ones to come home at the end of the day and removing guns from the streets will help ensure they do. No law enforcement agency composed of people charged with stopping gun violence and criminal usage should also be expected to sell guns to their citizens. Keeping guns from recirculating into the system and getting them truly out of circulation is a major piece of the puzzle. There is an epidemic of gun violence in this country with more than 100 people dying from gun violence every day and guns are the leading cause of death for people below the age of 20.
CON: This bill incorrectly focuses the blame for firearm crimes on the gun and not the criminal. Firearms sold or auctioned after a buyback are transferred in accordance with Washington's intensive firearm transfer requirements, including background checks and a 10-day waiting period. This bill is more problematic because it requires the destruction of not only the firearm and the features that make it operative, but it also requires a destruction of accessories like a scope. This bill is a solution in search of a problem and creates unacceptable risk that important pieces of history will be ignorantly lost.