Criminal History Records. The Washington State Criminal Records Privacy Act (Act) governs the handling of criminal history records by criminal justice agencies, such as courts and their administrative bodies. Under the Act, a criminal justice agency may disseminate criminal history record information that includes nonconviction data to:
Improper disclosure of conviction data under the Act is a misdemeanor. Civil action for the recovery of damages and reasonable attorneys' fees is also provided.
Washington Supreme Court Bailiffs. Under rules promulgated by the Washington Supreme Court (Supreme Court), the court appoints bailiffs whose duties are to attend all sessions of the court, maintain official hearing records, ensure that proper courtroom procedures are observed, and to perform other duties as may be required by the court. A bailiff is the chief security officer for the court, providing and coordinating security on site and when the court travels.
Authorizing Bailiffs of the Washington Supreme Court to Conduct Threat Assessments and Receive Criminal History Record Information. Bailiffs of the Supreme Court are authorized to conduct threat assessments on behalf of Supreme Court justices and to receive criminal history record information that includes nonconviction data for purposes exclusively related to the investigation of any person making a threat against a Supreme Court justice. The dissemination or use of criminal history records or nonconviction data for purposes other than authorized by law is prohibited.
Any threats investigated under this section and found to be credible must be referred to local law enforcement for further action. Local law enforcement is authorized to report the outcome and any anticipated action regarding such threats to the bailiffs of the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court must ensure that Supreme Court bailiffs are qualified by training and experience.
Clarifies that Bailiffs of the Supreme Court are authorized to receive criminal history record information for purposes exclusively related to assessing threats against a Supreme Court Justice.
The committee recommended a different version of the bill than what was heard. PRO: There have been growing threats nationally and locally against public officials, including judges. There have been specific threats made against Supreme Court justices that could not be adequately addressed by the court's bailiffs because the bailiffs were not qualified to receive criminal history information from law enforcement. The bill removes barriers to receiving potentially live saving information. Adequate safeguards are provided to prohibit the sharing of information beyond the need for assessing threats.
PRO: Representative Roger Goodman, Prime Sponsor; Dawn Rubio, Administrative Office of the Courts; Kyle Landry, Administrative Office of the Courts; Tracy Foster, Supreme Court of Washington; James McMahan, WA Assoc Sheriffs & Police Chiefs.